One Moviegoer With a Gun Could Have Prevented 70 Innocent People From Being Shot

truther 2

Mac Slavo
SHTFplan

In light of the incident at the Dark Knight premier early this morning, it’s worth noting that we as a law abiding society could have prevented the deaths of, at last count, 13 people and the injuries sustained by scores of others.

Anti-gun fanatics will tell us that outlawing guns is the solution. In fact, before the smoke from the gunfire dissipated this morning special interests and politicians were already calling for more gun control. Mayor of New York Michael Bloomberg has asked our Presidential candidates to directly address the issue:

No matter where you stand on the Second Amendment, no matter where you stand on guns, we have a right to hear from both of them, concretely, not just in generalities, specifically, what are they going to do about guns?

No doubt Mr. Bloomberg (and his merry band of government nitwits) would be ecstatic if both candidates supported a Constitutional Convention to eliminate the second amendment.

While Messers Obama and Romney will likely treat us to a host of platitudes regarding the issue, the fact of the matter is that prevention of such horrendous crimes falls not in the hands of the government, but of the people.

Take, for example, the recent actions of a Florida man who spotted two armed robbers enter the internet cafe that he was patronizing. He just so happened to be a card carrying member of the personal responsibility club and had his weapon strapped to his belt.

The two robbers burst through the doors of the Palms Internet Cafe in Ocala and ordered everyone to get down as they waved a handgun at dozens of customers.

But they didn’t expect Samuel Williams to pull out his own weapon and fire…

Via The Daily Crux

When these thugs started waving their guns around and ordering people to the floor, Samuel Williams didn’t hesitate. He drew his weapon and opened fire. He may have saved dozens of lives by his actions.

Video courtesy of Sherrie Questioning All:

YouTube Preview Image

A witness summarizes how Williams took care of business:

This guy kept poppin’. He didn’t stop. He just kept poppin’… I think he shot both of them.

Seconds counted; the police were minutes away; Mr. Williams, not knowing what the intentions of the armed robbers were, took action.

Lives were saved, the armed robbers were wounded (unfortunately), arrested and subsequently released on bail (because that’s how government “prevents” violent crime).

The other ‘preventative’ measure put forth by a government that wants to ensure they and they alone have the right to impose their will by way of the gun would be to strip the rest of us of our right to defend ourselves. In a few days they may do just that when President Obama and Secretary Clinton join the United Nations in their never ending battle to restrict private ownership.

But, as we’ve seen countless times – in the UK, Washington D.C., and most notably in Chicago, Illinois – when you ban guns, violent crimes (gun crimes in many cases!) actually increase. Crime has gotten so bad in Chicago that we can’t even call it crime anymore. As the police gang unit in the city described it, it’s a war zone not dissimilar to what soldiers see in Iraq and Afghanistan.

At the risk of beating a dead horse, we’ll repeat the adage that when private law abiding citizens are banned from owning guns and defending themselves, only criminals will have the guns. And they will use them to indiscriminately murder innocent men, women and children.

Mayor Bloomberg wants to know what we are going to do about guns?

How will we prevent another Dark Knight rampage, or Columbine massacre or Luby’s incident?

The answer is to allow American citizens to arm themselves. An armed society is a peaceful and respectful society. 

And when you get that small percentage of people who truly have mental disorders, who don’t care about killing others or dying themselves, there is nothing – not a gun ban or a liberal group hug that’s going to stop them.

Such an action as was committed by the psychopath in a movie theater today can be dealt with in just one fashion: DEADLY FORCE.

The talking heads and politicians will analyze the gunman’s motives. Psychologist and doctors will explain to us how we need to find the troublesome people before they strike. Anti-gun advocates will cite statistics and organize protests.

Here’s the reality of it.

This is America. We have laws that allow Americans to own guns, so you’re just not going to get them off the streets. We can’t simply arrest people for pre-crime if we suspect them of having a mental condition, because as we know, the government now classifies millions of us as domestic terrorists and just plain nuts, so that option is akin to shipping us all off to re-education camps or worse.

There is only one way to lower the violent crime rate and put the power back into the hands of peaceful people who intend to live their lives to the fullest and in a manner consistent with the rule of law.

It’s simple, really.

One moviegoer with a gun could have prevented 70 innocent people from being shot today.

Enter Your Mail Address

Share

Add To The Conversation Using Facebook Comments

2 Comments »

  1. Stan Sikorski July 24, 2012 at 12:36 am - Reply

    Speaking of lowlife cunts, what the hell is your major malfuntion nutlips? I get it! You have all this anger inside yourself from gunning down women and children for the jews over in Afganistan and Iraq. Im sure zog will reward you well for your subservience, no?

    Concealed carry would go a long way to slowing down the criminal spiral this country is caught in. At least it would keep a few more White people from becoming victims of negro and latrino crime.

    That whore Hillary needs to swing from a tree by a rope around her neck for treason. Frobama? Well, we all know where he’s at. It’s time to clean this country up.

  2. Nickolas Scott July 23, 2012 at 3:30 pm - Reply

    Seriously fuck you, you piece of shit lowlife cunt. Ignorant pieces of shit like you with a hero complex are the reason these types of deadly weapons aren't banned in the first place. NO CIVILIAN NEEDS A HIGH CAPACITY 80+ ROUND DRUM or an assault weapon that can easily be modded to fully automatic, which we all know can be done with an AR-15.

    Having been in a war I can tell you that trained Soldiers, ones who are trained to kill and expecting danger, generally have 1 of 2 reactions the first time out: 1. Freeze and do nothing, the natural human fear response. 2. Shit their pants (literally), panic, and run.

    And you think some random civilian in a dark crowded movie theatre is going to overcome: 1. The shooter's major element of surprise, where the shooter has already shot 30+ rounds by the time someone figures out what's going on, 2. The darkness of the theatre, 3. Tear gas, 4. A panicking crowd, 5. Body Armour.

    Seriously fuck off with your bullshit and stop trying to push your fucked up agenda on the backs of the victims. Have you no shame at all?

Leave A Response »