100 Million Years Old Giant Skull And Teeth Found Embedded In Coal

truther 20
Source

Wrote Bill O’Brien:   

“There was a time when Conrad regarded the integrity of the scientific establishment as beyond reproach. But after seven years of dealing with paleontologists and archaeologists, he said he has found them to be a devious and untrustworthy bunch whose actions in relation to him have been downright dishonest and deceitful.”

“Conrad believes his discovery has frightened members of the archeological/ paleontological establishment out of their wits. They dread the truth, he says, because they know their cozy little clique will be gone with the eons. No longer will they be able to sup at the trough of Darwinism, enjoying soft jobs with huge salaries.”

 

 

 

 

This is the very first specimen that Ed Conrad discovered in the Carboniferous-dated anthracite region of Pennsylvania but the Smithsonian’s experts dismissed it as a concretion, a rock. However, petrified teeth were found inside the jaw-like area and an infrared scan revealed the material is “compatible with either tooth or bone in origin.”

As time passed, Ed continued to search the same locality and kept finding numerous unusual objects that bore the contour of bone, although rock-like in their brownish coloration and weight.

Approximately a year later and in the same general area _ only a short distance from where he had found the specimen resembling an anthropoid skull — Ed discovered the large boulder in which was embedded the object that bore a distinct resemblance to a human cranium.

Actually, Ed had passed the specimen hundreds of times but only after doing a bit of study about human skulls was he able to recognize it, since the jaw like area was facing downward.

This is the boulder with the human skull protruding that Ed Conrad discovered in 1982, about a year after finding the specimen resembling the anthropoid skull. It was found in the same general area in precisely this position, with the jawbone facing downward. The Smithsonian had admitted that the protrusion does indeed resemble a human skull.

100 Million Years Old Giant Skull And Teeth Found Embedded In Coal
This is another view of the human skull-like specimen protruding from the boulder. 

 

Wilton M. Krogman, the internationally acclaimed bone expert and author of “The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine,” proudly holds one of Ed Conrad’s specimens which he had identified as a human calvarium, a portion of a skull with the eyesockets broken off.

A CATscan had been done of this particular specimen and revealed intriguing characteristics of a human skull.

 

This giant skull, embedded in solid rock, presents several problems for materialists.

“And it may seem harmless to you now that its been exposed. But, did you know that over 500 people obtained their PhD’s by writing their thesis on “the Piltdown Man”? I dare say, no one took back those PhDs after it was exposed, and those people taught hundreds of thousands of people.” Wyatt, Newletter Five

In 1982 Dr. Lyall Watson stated: “The fossils that decorate our family tree are so scarce that there are still more scientists than specimens. The remarkable fact is that all of the physical evidence we have for human evolution can still be placed, with room to spare, inside a single coffin!”

Likewise, a 1994 article in Time Magazine admitted that: “Yet despite more than a century of digging, the fossil record remains maddeningly sparse. With so few clues, even a single bone that doesn’t fit into the picture can upset everything. Virtually every major discovery has put deep cracks in the conventional wisdom and forced scientists to concoct new theories, amid furious debate.”

Prior to more recent developments of techniques for dating by means of radioactive materials, there were fundamentally only two methods of estimating the age of a fossil. The first was the geological level at which the specimen was found.

The second, applying more particularly to human fossils, was the general appearance: whether apish and “primitive,” or essentially like modern man. These two criteria are still largely applied, since the majority of the more ancient remains of early man are completely fossilized and C-14 methods of dating cannot be used.

But it has long been recognized that if the fossil remains of early man are arranged according to their degree of primitiveness, the order will be found to contradict the series arranged on the basis of antiquity as established by the levels at which they are found.”

GIGANTOPITHECUS” & “MEGANTHROPUS”

There is no controversy about these facts; there was a race or group of people found in Australia called “meganthropus” by anthropologists. These people were of very large size–estimated between 7 to 12 feet tall, depending on what source you read.

These people were found with mega tool artifacts, so their humaness is difficult to question. Four jaw fragments and thousands of teeth have been found in China of “gigantopithecus blacki”–named after the discover. Based on the size of the teeth and deep jaws, its size has been estimated at around 10 feet and as tall as 12 feet, 1200 pounds. (Photo:Giant human femur reportedly found in Turkey)

The “problem” is that human fossils are the rarest of all, and generally, only the hardest bones, jaws, teeth and skulls survive. As with most “early man” artistic recreations, a great deal of the individual is surmised.

The question is, is gigantopithecus a man or an ape? I personally have no opinion, but it is clear that very large men did live once. Scientists are of course afraid of being ridiculed and rather than estimate the size of the individuals possessing larger skulls and teeth than “us”, they prefer to use the term robust.

Anthropologists spend quite a bit of time trying to decide what is an ape, what is a man, who they believe descended from who and the like. Now, most consider gigantopithecus an ape,(its more convenient to the theory of evol) but the co-discover at least, and many others still see no difference between the teeth and jaws of Giganto than other so-called ancestors.

As we said, everyone believes that meganthropus with his mega-tools was a “man”. Tools have been found in the same area as giganto as well, but the tendency has been to associate them with other “types’ found at the same location.

MEGANTHROPUS

A comparison of the megatools from the six occupation sites soon showed considerable stylisation in the hand-axes, knives, adzes and other tools, forming two distinct tool-type culture periods. These have since been named the “Late” and “Early Phase”, the “Early Phase” being the oldest and most primitive, the “Late Phase” showing more advanced styles of workmanship. …the strata in which the “Early Phase” tools are found date from around 60,000 back to 180,000 years BP.

This is an example of a Mega Tool, over eighteen inches high. From an article by Scott Corrales.Another example of a mega tool is an ancient 37 lb copper axe (not pictured)

Aboriginal occupation of the Bathurst region itself dates back at least 50,000 years, so it is obvious that Aborigines lived side by side with the megatool people

In this Photo below: on the top left is one of the skulls biologists have labeled Australopithecines. On the right Meganthropus. Bottom left is a modern man in scale along with a chimpanzee skull.

Giant stone-age man stone artefacts (implements) have been found in Central Western NSW Southern & far Northern Qld. These implements consist of hand axes, clubs, pounders, adzes, knives & other tools often ranging in weight from 8 to 36 lbs or more.

These artifacts are in fact identical to those used by meganthropus the giant Java man who inhabited SE Asia over a “million years ago”, Meganthropus stood 12 feet tall & weighed several hundred pounds..

Early in this century some unusually large human teeth and jawbones turned up, ones so large that their owner’s size has been estimated at six to nine feet tall. Those found in Europe were named Meganthropus, those found in south China and Java became known as Gigantopithecus

If one believes the Biblical account, their presence is no mystery, since giants are mentioned as living before the Flood (Gen. 6:4).

There were giants on the earth in those days…

 


An Afghani Giant with a US soldier


Please Donate Now

Please note that if you wish to make any amount of contribution to us, you can send it to us using Paypal ID info@pakalertpress.com.

Support Pakalert to keep alive

 

Related Articles:

Post Footer automatically generated by Add Post Footer Plugin for wordpress.

Enter Your Mail Address

Incoming search terms:

Share

Add To The Conversation Using Facebook Comments

20 Comments »

  1. progressivefairyMary August 30, 2013 at 11:32 pm - Reply

    they had a lot of global warming back then way before ALGORE was in charge so they could play and enjoy mother earth so they could eat really good food . But when they began to urinate on each other they would start fighting a lot and there wives made them stop doing that .

  2. Larry July 17, 2013 at 11:35 pm - Reply

    Back in about ’78, my wife and I took a group of cub scouts on an outing to the county museum at Hamilton, Mt. The person in charge showed us around, but I noticed an object on her desk. It was a human jaw bone, with teeth, embedded in a chunk of petrified wood! The object has since disappeared, and no one remembers having seen it.

    • Joseph Hiddink July 18, 2013 at 9:41 pm - Reply

      Do not forget that the earth was muchsmaller, rotated faster and had less gravity It made giant ceatures and giant men. They would attack a dinosaur of th Raptor type.

  3. Jack May 27, 2013 at 1:18 pm - Reply

    Do you believe mainstream anthrpologists attempt to hide fossils of giants, or do governments seize evidence?

  4. libby March 4, 2013 at 8:20 am - Reply

    the photographer obviously looked for the shortest Us soldier he could find to stand next to this guy to make him look bigger as the other men standing around are also much taller than the US soldier

    • cloud nine March 10, 2013 at 10:27 am - Reply

      Supposedly the Turk kings had such men for bodyguards.

    • Darin September 21, 2013 at 3:32 pm - Reply

      I would have beleived that except that the m-16 says it all. Its size is standard. So that is about the size it would be in my hands and I am 5’11″ ..

  5. ReverseTheIgnorance February 28, 2013 at 5:43 pm - Reply

    Giant People really does exist in the past Even today they exist but not that big compared to the past. The Earth from the past have much cleaner and rich in resources and vegetation without this nasty chemicals that exists in modern times.

    • Joseph Hiddink May 30, 2013 at 10:58 pm - Reply

      Earth was smaller at that time, rotated faster and had less gravity. The result was giant people, animals, plants and trees. THe eartyh gets hundreds of tons of grit and dust daily out of space, that makes the earth grow and slowly rotate at less speed.

  6. Daisy Dollington February 27, 2013 at 6:05 am - Reply

    If instead the giants had survived and extinguished us their bible might have been written “And in those days there were midgets upon the Earth”.

  7. Joseph Hiddink February 27, 2013 at 3:14 am - Reply

    It seems that the “experts” were miles off in their expertise.
    Even the Atlanteans were 10 to 15 feet tall. Look at the painting in the Egypt buildings.
    Big red-skinned Rulers and small black servants.

  8. Dave Webb February 26, 2013 at 1:11 pm - Reply

    There is no conspiracy. If these people had good, scientific data, they could publish it in respectable scientific journals – this is the real world acid test, like it or not. Undeniable evidence is undeniable, but science works by way of falsification, not belief, mutual agreement, or persuasion. If the data are refutable, end of story. If they feel the need to convince others, then they have to play by the same rules as everybody else, otherwise the public ends up not knowing who or what to trust.

    • cloud nine March 10, 2013 at 10:29 am - Reply

      Politics are quick to intervene and put short work to even facts if they do not follow the prescribed beliefs. Science journals or not.

  9. Frank February 26, 2013 at 11:35 am - Reply

    I would say they’re the nephilim but 100 million years old?

    • cloud nine March 10, 2013 at 10:33 am - Reply

      I could agree except they exist even today and Noah’s line did not carry the genes.
      But maybe some came back from fleeing to space.? I don’t know.
      I DO know the Bible says dinos were quite large.
      Men lived hundreds of years longer than after the flood.
      It give a lot more time with perfect conditions in which to grow.

  10. gary February 26, 2013 at 4:59 am - Reply

    you have to subscribe to group think in order to think like the group. Many new things are found by people that are outside the group as they don’t have the fear of being kicked out of your job when you question the group. You can replace group by just about any type of group and the above statement is still true.

    • TonyB February 26, 2013 at 10:09 am - Reply

      You got that right.

  11. BimBam February 26, 2013 at 2:16 am - Reply

    As usual, can’t make head or tails out of the picture. It only looks or resembles a skull but really, it could be anything.

  12. carl February 26, 2013 at 12:50 am - Reply

    New discoveries will need the same study as the dinosaurs had ,till we find out all the facts and can put toghter a complete study many ideas will be around.The brontosaurs no longer is a type of Dino. that we now know had the wrong head put on a diffrent body .these types of things will happen as we unearth more relics and learn how they fit in the path of history.

  13. MalContent Elder February 26, 2013 at 12:06 am - Reply

    Good grief! The Afghani giant standing next to the soldier! I hope he’s on our side! How many times would you need to shoot someone that big, with an M4? Can I get an airstrike!?

Leave A Response »