Unless Iran can be “scapegoated” as a nuclear threat, same lies as used against Iran, same lies as used to blame Afghanistan for the “Neocon/Israeli” 9/11 attack, the American public might “wise up” to their real enemies.
The “protocols” of the elders of the “Fed”
For instance, an America not obsessed with imaginary threats might take a long look at the Federal Reserve, who they really are, how illegal the “Fed” is and who the foreign bankers are that have looted America.
Of America’s 16-trillion-dollar “national debt, 10 trillion never existed, was never spent, never authorized, never paid out and never borrowed.
The American people are paying interest to the Rothschild and Rockefeller families on 10 trillion dollars that never existed.
Every nation that has a “central bank” is doing the same thing, one way or another. It is called “debt slavery.”
For America, every war since 1917, including and especially the phony “War on Terror,” has been started by the banking cartels empowered by Paul Warburg in 1913. Other nations had been fighting “bankster orchestrated” wars much longer.
Every military and intelligence expert in the world knows that the basis for Iran’s defense is maintaining a “nuclear free” state.
There can never be any possible rationale for vilifying Iran as long as it keeps “conventional only” defenses.
The game as played is childishly simple. Iran is saddled with crippling sanctions supported only by wild conspiracy theory.
When Iran objects, their opposition is then mischaracterized as belligerence, often to the absurd extreme of mistranslating statements. When that doesn’t work, Iran’s news services are censored.
Even a child could see this, but where are “children” when we need them?
No enemy can invade, Iran’s coastlines are impenetrable, its Silkworm-based maritime defenses overwhelming, its conventional missile arsenal can exhaust any AMB (anti-ballistic missile) defense system in a few hours.
Iran’s 13-million-man defense force is the largest in the world. The “tail kicking” that America has suffered in Afghanistan would be a “walk in the park” compared to Iran.
In 1982, the United States developed its “war plan” for the invasion of Iran. That plan required Iraq to attack from the east and for Pakistan to offer staging areas in Baluchistan.
That plan has never been updated, though the naval component has been left even more outdated based on Iran’s ability to sink American aircraft carriers well out into the Indian Ocean.
Selling Iranian nuke lies is terrorism
Recently, UN human rights raconteurs have cited US President Obama’s failure to prosecute not only his predecessor but key members of his administration, members of Congress, Pentagon officials and AIPAC lobbyists for planning and executing an illegal war of aggression against Iraq.
The process leading to war has been clearly defined; all responsible parties are named; the criminality of their efforts has been well established but war criminals, perhaps numbering in the hundreds, even thousands, not only roam free but are back to their old tricks.
Hundreds of those who planned the slaughter in Iraq, the Neocons, AIPAC, members of Congress, religious extremists at America’s service academies, hate mongers, racists and anti-Semites within the military and the paid traitors and spies who own Hollywood and control most media, are active in pushing for a new war.
Be it films like Argo or Zero Dark Thirty, or the NCIS TV shows, the entire Murdoch empire, CNN, Romney’s “Clear Channel” stranglehold on American “talk radio,” vicious racist propaganda infects every waking moment.
Canada is worse, actually much worse.
Last week, the Canadian Foreign Minister John Baird made threats against the legally constituted Palestinian state if they chose to seek war crimes prosecution against Israel.
Baird’s statement itself qualifies for criminal prosecution under the Rome Statute for the International Criminal Court 1998, specifically under sections 25, 27, 28, 30 and 33.
Among the potential charges are “aiding and abetting war crimes and crimes against humanity.”
Canada’s links to terrorism cited by Swiss police, South Africans
Police in Switzerland have been issued with broad detention orders that apply to all Canadian passport holders, including diplomatic credentials.
In an interview with a Swiss police spokesman, Veterans Today was told:
“The Canadian embassy in Switzerland has been issuing false passports to criminals including terror suspects.”
South Africa security officials confirm they have received the same notification and have made one arrest.
False reports on Iran’s “nuclear threat” are war crimes and crimes against humanity
This week, former Chief of the United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspections Commission operating in Iraq from 2000 to 2003, Hans Blix, made the following statement to a group of Dubai-based reporters:
“Memories of the failure and tragic mistakes in Iraq are not taken sufficiently seriously, so far Iran has not violated NPT (the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty) and there is no evidence right now that suggests that Iran is producing nuclear weapons.
In the case of Iraq, there was an attempt made by some states to eradicate weapons of mass destruction that did not exist, and today there is talk of going on Iran to eradicate intentions that may not exist, I hope that will not happen.
So far Iran has not violated the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and there is no evidence right now that suggests that Iran is producing nuclear weapons.”
This is only the most recent of dozens of authoritative assessments that all have found Iran’s nuclear programs to be consistent with the NPT.
A question then would be, ‘Why do we continually hear of Iran building nuclear weapons and threatening its neighbors when there is no proof of any kind that this is the case?’
The flurry of pronouncements, many from world leaders, all parroting rumors, storylines from TV dramas or conspiracy innuendo that invariably tracks down to Israeli sources, all have the same characteristics:
1. No proof or evidence is offered, and none of the sources ever offered have credentials in nuclear physics and weapons-based engineering and design.
2. No scientific explanations are given, only statements deemed “self-evident,” based on “assumption.”
3. No mention is ever made that the UN assembly has demanded to examine Israel’s nuclear program but not Iran’s.
4. No mention is ever made that the programs said to pose a threat are all considered legal for every nation on earth except Iran.
There is no conceivable way to interpret the above-listed behavior in any other light than to see them as part and parcel of a move to obfuscate and conceal on behalf of entities planning to launch an illegal aggressive war on Iran.
With all evidence and proof supporting Iran’s assertions as to the peaceful nature of their nuclear program, those asserting otherwise based on systematic falsehood in order to justify war crimes are themselves war criminals.
An analysis of the real motivations behind the “War on Terror” reveals actual motivations to be a “cover and deception” operation in order to keep public attention away from engineered banking and currency collapses, artificial energy sector shortages, massive governmental corruption and the total erosion of human rights.
Once this is accepted, and the evidence is incontrovertible, it is similarly incontrovertible that the series of bizarre happenings, the suspension of all physical laws on 9/11, the London 7/7 attacks, hiring actors to simulate a real terror attack, the imaginary al-Qaeda underground sites in Afghanistan, these and countless more false flag scenarios, are acts of “financial terrorism.”
Are the seemingly endless machinations against Iran more of the same, in particular, the same financial criminals trying another heist?
Consider that the second Iran is attacked, the Straits of Hormuz and the Baku/Ceyhan pipeline close.
Ask any economist.
Ask any defense expert.
Iran controls the two great energy “strangleholds” in the world. If they are “choked off,” no economy in the world, no currency, no stock market, would survive 24 hours.
Then we ask, ‘Who would profit from such a thing? Do the names Rothschild and Rockefeller sound familiar?’