Uncle Ruslan and the Official Boston Bombing Narrative

truther April 26, 2013 1

Uncle of Tsarnaev brothers allegedly worked for USAID and company linked to Halliburton

Kurt Nimmo
Infowars

Following Zubeidat Tsarnaev’s claim that her son, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, was set-up by the FBI, her brother-in-law, Ruslan Tsarni, was rolled out to engage in damage control and save the official narrative on the Boston bombings.

Uncle Ruslan and the Official Boston Bombing Narrative

Tsarni called his nephews “losers” and insisted that because the brothers had failed to integrate themselves in the United States they were consumed with hatred.

The establishment media immediately spotlighted “Uncle Ruslan,” as they affectionately called him, and attempted to bury or at least minimize the impact of Zubeidat Tsarnaev’s claim that her sons are patsies.

“Tsarni’s own emotions have taken a roller-coaster of guilt and anger, he said in an interview, fueled by the family’s failure to recognize that Tamerlan’s interest in Islam over the past six years may have crossed into violent radicalism,” Bloomberg reported on Wednesday.

Uncle Ruslan, however, isn’t merely a concerned relative. It is said he not only worked for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) in the former Soviet Republic of Kazakhstan, but also did time with Big Sky Energy Corp., a gas and oil corporation with ties to Cheney’s Halliburton, a Pentagon contractor in bed with the CIA.

As we noted on Wednesday, USAID is an agency used by the U.S. government to operate “humanitarian” NGOs instrumental in running color revolutions in former Soviet states. It collaborates with the Freedom House, the CIA front the National Endowment for Democracy, Soros Foundations, and the CIA’s Ford Foundation to undermine governments in the former Soviet Union, now the Russian Federation.

Add To The Conversation Using Facebook Comments

One Comment »

  1. 5 War Veteran April 26, 2013 at 10:01 pm - Reply

    Though I cannot judge one way or the other this Uncles “testimony” does not “resonate” with me.
    Meaning it does not fit with my gut instinct. It sounds too much like a “paid” testimony and the Uncle is reaping the profit.
    I do not know how anyone can call intelligent healthy college students “losers”.
    Losers are crack heads and and criminals. They are high school drop outs and those who choose perpetual unemployment. They are the baby machines who live on the givernment dole instead of becoming productive citizens.
    They are the ones who are happy with their lot in live and unwilling to improve it.
    The drug abusers and the users.

    Is that an adequate definition of “loser”?

Leave A Response »

SENGTOTO
SENGTOTO
LOGIN EVOSTOSO
DAFTAR EVOSTOTO
jebol togel
mikatoto
Slot Gacor
mikatoto