BREAKING: Navy Seal Claims Top Brass Asked if They Will Disarm Americans

3

Former Navy SEAL Ben Smith warns that the Obama administration is asking top brass in the military if they would be comfortable with disarming U.S. citizens, a litmus test that includes gauging whether they would be prepared to order troops to fire on Americans.

BREAKING Navy Seal Claims Top Brass Asked if They Will Disarm Americans

Smith provoked headlines last week when he appeared on Fox News to assert that the federal government was trying to provoke veterans into violence as an excuse to implement martial law.

Speaking exclusively to the Alex Jones Show, Smith stated, “Going back to the beginning of this administration, I’ve had friends within the community talking about how they were brought in and questioned with people from more towards the top side and the questioning….where it was pointing was do you feel comfortable disarming American citizens,” adding that this was one of the many “funny things” occurring within the military.

When Smith was asked by radio host Alex Jones if this line of questioning included a litmus test whereby military officers were asked if they would fire on U.S. citizens, he responded in the affirmative.

Smith said the litmus test was related to the recent firing of top military commanders Navy Vice Adm. Tim Giardina and Maj. Gen. Michael Carey.

Smith linked the premise to former Obama advisor Van Jones, who was forced to resign in September 2009 after his links with a Marxist organization were revealed.

“You drop the radical pose for the radical ends,” said Smith, paraphrasing Van Jones.

The idea of U.S. soldiers being asked if they will fire on American citizens during a crisis or mass disarmament program has emerged from several different sources over the last two decades.

In January, 2009 Nobel Peace Prize nominee Jim Garrow claimed he was told by a top military veteran that the Obama administration’s “litmus test” for new military leaders is whether or not they will obey an order to fire on U.S. citizens.

Concerns over U.S. troops being given orders to fire on American citizens in the event of mass gun confiscation first arose in May 1994 when hundreds of Marines at 29 Palms, California were given a survey as part of an academic project by Navy Lieutenant Commander Ernest Guy Cunningham which asked the Marines if they would, “Fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist confiscation of firearms banned by the United States government.”

The survey was subsequently leaked because many of the Marines who took it were shocked by the tone of the question.

[youtube]Kpsp0BVfcXw[/youtube]

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 Responses

  1. David Silva says:

    The unwritten rule in the US military is that if your Commanding Officer ever asks you to use your weapon against Americans, you turn your weapon on your C.O.

  2. 5 War Veteran says:

    Obama does not want a strong America he wants FEALTY from America.

    Fealty –
    1 a : the fidelity of a vassal or feudal tenant to his lord
    b : the obligation of such fidelity

    2 : intense fidelity

    If there is anyone out there who wants to differ with this, PLEASE be prepared to provide intelligent conversation.

    Race in not an issue, do not mention it.

    Ask yourself WHY would Obama and the US Government want to take weapons from LAW ABIDING citizens? Why were weapons taken away from citizens in the past? Learn history before repeating it.

    1911 – Turkey disarmed its citizens, and between 1915 – 1917 they murdered 1.5 million Armenians.
    1929 – Russia disarmed its citizens, and between 1929 – 1953 they murdered 20 million Russians.
    1935 – China disarmed its citizens, and between 1948 – 1952 they murdered 20 million Chinese.
    1938 – Germany disarmed its citizens, and between 1939 – 1945 they murdered 16 million Jews.
    1956 – Cambodia disarmed its citizens, and between 1975 – 1977 they murdered 1 million Educated people.
    1964 – Guatemala disarmed its citizens, and between 1964 – 1981 they murdered 100,000 Mayan Indians.
    1970 – Uganda disarmed its citizens, and between 1971 – 1979 they murdered 300,000 Christians.

    Australian Gun Law Update

    From: Ed Chenel, A police officer in Australia … Hi Yanks, I thought you all would like to see the real figures from Down Under. It has now been 12 months since gun owners in Take note Americans, before it’s too late! Will you be one of the sheep to turn yours in? WHY? You will need it.

    [youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGaDAThOHhA?feature=player_embedded&w=640&h=360%5D

    One year after gun-owners were forced to surrender 640,381 personal firearms to be destroyed, including semi-automatic .22 rifles and shotguns, a program costing the government over 500 million dollars, the results are in…
    A dramatic increase in criminal activity has been experienced. Gun control advocates respond “Just wait… we’ll be safer…you’ll see…”.
    OBSERVABLE FACT, AFTER 12 MONTHS OF DATA:
    * Australia-wide, homicides are up 3.2%
    * Australia-wide, assaults are up 8.6%
    * Australia-wide, armed-robberies are up 44% (yes, FORTY-FOUR PERCENT)
    * In the state of Victoria, homicides-with-firearms are up 300%
    * Figures over the previous 25 years show a steady decrease in homicides-with-firearms (changed dramatically in the past 12 months)
    * Figures over the previous 25 years show a steady decrease in armed-robbery-with-firearms (changed dramatically in the past 12 months)
    * There has been a dramatic increase in breakins-and-assaults-of-the-elderly
    * At the time of the ban, the Prime Minister said “self-defense is not a reason for owning a firearm”
    * From 1910 to present, homicides in Australia had averaged about 1.8-per-100,000 or lower, a safe society by any standard.
    * The ban has destroyed Australia’s standings in some international sport shooting competitions
    * The membership of the Australian Sports Shooting Association has risen to 112,000, a 200% increase, in response to the ban and as an attempt to organize against further controls, which are expected.
    * Australian politicians are on the spot and at a loss to explain how no improvement in “safety” has been observed after such monumental effort and expense was successfully expended in “ridding society of guns”. Their response has been to “wait longer”.
    “…The best organization you’ve got there, the biggest organization you’ve got there is the NRA. We didn’t have an organization that size, and as a consequence, we suffered. And we hope that you don’t suffer…”

    My simple rule is, if you shoot at me then I will return the favor. I have been in too many bullshit wars for the wealthy elite to die in America for more political bullshit.

  3. Ltpar says:

    The Obama Administration and their annointed military advisers need to remember that it is a two way street upon which they walk. I would never use violence against a fellow American law enforcement, or military member under most circumstances. If however, they knowingly undertook an attack on law abiding American citizens under orders of their bosses, then all bets would be off. I am sure that most other Americans feel the same way. The enemy is not “We the People,” it is those who want to destroy our country and enslave us.

Leave a Reply

© 2013 Pakalert Press. All rights reserved.