Did NBC’s David Gregory Violate D.C. Gun Law on National TV?

truther December 26, 2012 3

Madeleine Morgenstern
The Blaze

NBC’s David Gregory on Sunday held up a high-capacity magazine for ammunition on national television, a possible violation of Washington, D.C. gun law.

Gregory was asking National Rifle Association CEO Wayne LaPierre whether the NRA was willing to cede any ground on new gun legislation following the Dec. 14 elementary school shooting in Newtown, Conn.

“Here is a magazine for ammunition that carries 30 bullets,” Gregory said on “Meet the Press,” holding it up. “Now isn’t it possible that if we got rid of these, if we replaced them and said, ‘Well, you could only have a magazine that carries five bullets or ten bullets,’ isn’t it just possible that we could reduce the carnage in a situation like Newtown?”

As blog The Patriot Perspective pointed out, Gregory’s demonstration may itself have been a violation of existing D.C. gun law, where “Meet the Press” tapes.

“No person in the District shall possess, sell, or transfer any large capacity ammunition feeding device regardless of whether the device is attached to a firearm. A ‘large capacity ammunition feeding device’ means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition,” D.C. code states. Violations may include a $1,000 fine or imprisonment for up to a year.

As blog The Patriot Perspective pointed out, Gregory’s demonstration may itself have been a violation of existing D.C. gun law, where “Meet the Press” tapes.

“No person in the District shall possess, sell, or transfer any large capacity ammunition feeding device regardless of whether the device is attached to a firearm. A ‘large capacity ammunition feeding device’ means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition,” D.C. code states. Violations may include a $1,000 fine or imprisonment for up to a year.

Add To The Conversation Using Facebook Comments

3 Comments »

  1. Dan December 27, 2012 at 9:32 am - Reply

    What an idiot. Banning them will not stop the criminals who already have them. Laws keep honest people honest but criminals do not give a shit.
    Will we ban slingshots next?
    I can kill just about anything with a well placed slingshot and the thwap! of the rubber will not be heard a room away.
    Politicians are really stupid. Oh and Okinawa is going to capsize too!

  2. Stan Sikorski December 27, 2012 at 12:34 am - Reply

    Chimp face Gregory should be hung by his own petard.

  3. david frobel December 26, 2012 at 10:45 pm - Reply

    whot the hell,,there are so meany around,its inpossable to inforce such a lawr,,it would be easer to keep merders in jail and not let them out alive,,and the drugs they give meantaly ill,,guns are not the problam here,,the onley thing that would help there is if they confrascated all guns,,,and we all know that wont happen,,no lowr on gun controle would work now,,there is to meaney out there.

Leave A Response »

Click here to cancel reply.

SENGTOTO
SENGTOTO
LOGIN EVOSTOSO
DAFTAR EVOSTOTO
jebol togel
mikatoto
Slot Gacor
mikatoto