Holy Fukushima – Radiation From Japan Is Already Killing North Americans

469

Jeromie Williams

You’re going to want to use every share button at the bottom of this article once you’re done reading, so get ready, it’s time to freak out:  Maybe.

If you live on the west coast of Canada or the United States, you’re pretty much already screwed at this point thanks to the Japanese earthquake and tsunami of 2011.  Radiation levels are already increasing in the food and water, babies born with thyroid issues linked to radiation are rising quickly and governments in Canada and the United States are raising the “acceptable levels” of certain toxic substances in the food being shipped in from Japan.

Holy Fukushima – Radiation From Japan Is Already Killing North Americans

This isn’t a conspiracy theory, this is happening and it’s happening right now.

The fancy little picture at the top of the article isn’t showing you the flow of happy fun time thoughts from Japan back in March of 2012, it’s showing you the flow of radiation from the Fukushima nuclear plant after the devastating earthquake and tsunami of 2011.  Yes, that sharp pain you just felt in your chest is the sudden realization that the image shows the radiation reaching almost past Hawaii more than a year ago.

Do the math – If that radiation screamed across the Pacific Ocean that far in one year, just how far do you think it has gotten since then?  Look at what World Truth TV is saying and then you decide.

Samples of milk taken across the United States have shown radiation at levels 2000 percent higher than EPA maximums.  The reason that milk is so significant is that it is representative of the entire food supply.  According to an article published on Natural News, “Cows consume grass and are exposed to the same elements as food crops and water supplies. In other words, when cows’ milk starts testing positive for high levels of radioactive elements, this is indicative of radioactive contamination of the entire food supply.”

The  Food and Drug  Administration and the Environmental Deception Protection Agency, instead of refusing to prohibit the sale of tainted foods and mandatory testing of foods produced and harvested from the Pacific Coast, have simply raised the “acceptable levels”  of radioactive material in foods.

If that doesn’t scare the ever-living crap out of you, then take a look at the list of foods you are now supposed to be wary of, you know, for only the next 30,000 years.

How can we protect ourselves? First, be aware of what items are likely to be highly tainted.

1.)  SEAFOOD:  Question the origin of ALL seafood.  Fish and crustaceans from the Pacific Ocean should all be considered to be poisoned with radiation.

2.)  WATER:  The rainfall and snowfall are all radiated.  Do not drink any water that has not been filtered.   The tap water that flows from your faucet has NOT been treated to rid it of radioactive particles. A recent report from the NY Times stated, “A rooftop water monitoring program managed by UC Berkeley’s Department of Nuclear Engineering detected substantial spikes in rain-borne iodine-131 during torrential downpours …

3.) DAIRY PRODUCTS:  Milk and milk products from the West Coast states currently have the highest levels of radiation in North America.

4.)  PRODUCE:  Leafy Vegetables, Wines, Tomatoes, Strawberries….all produce from California or any other West Coast State are also likely to be tainted.

5.)  MEAT:  If an animal eats any leafy vegetable all along the West Coast, that animal has consumed radiation, and is poisoned.  This is any animal from cows, pigs, goats, sheep to wild deer and other game.

If you eat the above foods from areas with high radiation levels, you are eating radiation and feeding it to your children. Slowly the radiation levels within your body will build up.  This is PERMANENT.

Infant mortality rates across the United States have increased by more than 35% since the nuclear disaster, according to a court statement by Dr. Sherman with independent scientist Leuren Moret, MA, PhD.  A study published in The International Journal of Medicine indicates that more than 20,000 deaths right here in North America can be directly attributed to the release of radioactive material from Fukushima.

Radioactive isotopes of the type released from Fukushima have a half-life of 30,000 years.  This means that we must permanently change the way we prepare our food.

  • Wash your food with soap and rinse it in filtered water. 
  • Be aware of the origins of your vegetables, fish, game and seafood.
  • Keep abreast of radiation levels to help monitor where your food is acquired.
  • Use only filtered water for drinking, cooking and ice.

I don’t know about the rest of you, but that one way trip to colonize Mars is looking pretty damn attractive right now.

Add To The Conversation Using Facebook Comments

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

469 Responses

  1. Revelation eight (8) states that one third (1/3) of life in the oceans would die in a plague. The Pacific Ocean is one third of all water on earth. I wonder if this could eventually end up being the fulfillment of Bible prophecy?

    This is a hidden disaster that is slowly coming to light. Fukushima has the capacity to being one of the worsr disasters of all time. Give it time.

  2. Paul says:

    The article is valid in a broad perspective. For example, military nuclear training does indicate the avoidance provisions of this article. My trail to this article came from the recent and mysterious development of reduced lung capacity in a recent college graduate in the North East US. The impact of radon on the lungs of US citizens has been studied.

    Add the atmospheric fallout of Fukishima. The NOAA water chart is also a fact. Grim as it may be. The uplift of radiation into a typhoon allows the radiation to be introduced into the jet stream in the upper atmosphere. That brings it to the US, particularly the West Coast where it is washed out in precipitation.

    Are we experiencing a “Nuclear Winter” in 2013 and 2014? The Nuclear Winter also was predicted in US Military training following nuclear fall out warfare planning.

    To close, I had the opportunity to meet Harry Kuni. Harry walked on the open air nuclear testing site in Nevada in a lead suit to collect samples buried in the sand that contained seafood. Obviously he did this following the testing for the bomb used in WWII. He lived to be 96. He did not die of cancer.

    For the nay sayers, not all will suffer the consequences of Fukishima. But as cancer rates show, it will get far more of us now that world governments failed to plan accordingly in the Nuclear realm.

    Paul

  3. Kristin Weeks says:

    I agree with all of this except. Wash your fruit & vegetables with soap??!?! Soap is pure chemicals the last thing you want to do is bathe your food in chemicals. Instead wash fruit & vegetables by soaking them in apple cider vinegar & filtered water. NOT SOAP.

  4. x10 says:

    I hated this article the first time I read it and I hate it still. Already killing North Americans? This whole article is gibberish. But don’t forget to be very afraid and remember that “the government” is always lying all the time because they’re trying to kill you.

    http://deepseanews.com/2014/01/all-the-best-scientifically-verified-information-on-fukushima-impacts/

  5. Walt says:

    By Radiation, they mean the popularization of Sushi and hibachi in America. Seriously, It just isn’t fun anymore.

  6. Alex says:

    Well that really sucks considering I live in California

  7. Kyla Collins says:

    I hope most people know that you can not wash radiation off with soap and water……

  8. Marcos says:

    Come to Brazil! Here there is plenty of space to live.

  9. Ivan Serbian says:

    It’s God punishing you now ..
    The same you did the Serbian people ..
    Radiation continues today … From 1999
    To you Americans should be even worse punishment because you hurt many people and different nations ..!

    • Blind Ignorance says:

      Why are innocent citizens of a country with a messed up government to blame? You want Americans to die? I hope this isn’t news to you but the average American citizen cannot influence Foreign Policy in the US. You’re an actual idiot.

    • Kristan says:

      you need to stop blaming people. All i can say is that we are not our government and believe very much so, we do not agree with over half the things they do. Besides that, its not to after the fact half the time until it happens that we know

    • Girl says:

      Youre a dumb ass..You should be punished for being an ignorant fuck. “You Americans”? Fuck you idiot. Dumb Serbian dick eater.. This is why everyone hates each other because of grudge holding morons such as yourself. Personally I didnt do shit to Serbia and im American.. so go fuck yourself please and thank you.

    • Amurica says:

      I’m sorry…. Did I… do something to you? It’s hard keeping names straight when there are just so many…
      But you probably deserved it, so it’s (radiated) water under the bridge.

  10. B Smith says:

    I work in a nuclear plant & filtered water is not filtered for radiation. The only radiation is will remove is particulate, and that would still leave the water with some level of radiation.

  11. Adam says:

    This is pseudoscience, do some research from real scientists instead of listening to uneducated fear propaganda.
    http://deepseanews.com/2014/01/all-the-best-scientifically-verified-information-on-fukushima-impacts/

  12. mike says:

    Everone back to work your government is in cotttrrrooooooooollllllllllll. NO THINKING NO BELIVING.

  13. K.Dorn says:

    What do you do when you live in the state of Hawaii with no choice?

    • Kristan says:

      Is that where you are, how are things going over there right now honey ? Best of luck please keep me updated, its nice to know the truth

  14. mirzad says:

    “you’re pretty much already screwed at this point thanks to the Japanese earthquake “. lol. Such a ignorant statement. It’s not Japans fault for having an earthquake.

    • Boschki says:

      That’s why it said “thanks to the Japanese earthquake.” Not “thanks to the Japanese.”

      • the W says:

        You are dumb. It should have been thanks to the Earthquake in Japan. But calling it the Japanese earthquake gives it a whole different feeling when rread. like it is owned by all thrower fault. Now as Americans we do own an earthquake machine, so Oise it our fair and now happen is the new face of terror blahahshaha

  15. Goomba says:

    Is everyone who believes this in a bunker somewhere with aluminum foil on their heads? If it is really that frightening shut up and protect yourself while the rest of us go on with our lives.

  16. Anthony says:

    The “journalist,” Jeremie Williams, who wrote this article, whether or not the article’s assumptions are true, does not need to write in such an informal tone that has undertones of fear mongering. Know wonder the Pakalert Press isn’t a more reputable news source. I mean, Mr. Williams, do you honestly think you will be taken seriously as a journalist when you say things like “ever-living crap” in your article?

  17. Topsy says:

    Your from the middle east; of course you wouldn’t care. Honestly though no one cares about your statement; and you yourself is a waste of person.

    Middle East man
    do you really want us to feel sorry the american ? you must be kidding , we didnt feel sorry for Hiroshima , Nor Najazaki folks , dont expect me to feel sorry for them.

  18. Rachel says:

    You should be ashamed of yourself for reckless reporting. You are going to make people horrified to eat or drink anything.

  19. Hope says:

    They cover the news stories on the radiation levels but what about the damn chemtrials they are spraying on us everyday. That right there alone is making everyone sick. Statistics have rising of people having upper respiratory issues and being diagnosed with crap that they have never had in their lifetime (ie; bronchitis). What about the foods from over seas that they help chemical engineer ingredients to give people cancer or just make them sick so BIG PHARMA can stay in business and push their drugs.

  20. connie says:

    Very nice Alex that was done with finesse, all the items popping up lately on
    face book are starting small fires and a lot of unnecessary panic. Wagon Train were not very comfy but you took life as it came,less stress.

  21. Shelly Krueger says:

    I wonder how you could apply the dilution theory to Chernobyl. I wonder how that works for you. Would that explain why that area is still unlivable?

    • Zak says:

      Chernobyl Unlivable? There going there now they planted thousands of hemp plants to adsorb the radiation in the ground and its a much safer place today,might wanna get your facts straight

  22. Rover says:

    Whomever wrote this article is a fucking idiot, and knows absolutely nothing about science.

  23. kayla says:

    Where would i find who published this article?

  24. Olavo says:

    Why not writing about the impacts in Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Who did that? How about those people and the next generations? This is a stupid article!

  25. Rog says:

    Okay so here is this. the Science does not add up! you people who believe this are blind. Sorry but I have to be blunt I agree the disaster not good for the world BUT STOP BEING PARANOID DO RESEARCH YOU WILL BE OKAY YOU WILL NOT GROW A TAIL WITH AN EYE ON IT OUT YOUR BUTTCRACK lol geesh lol people come on now lol you just got to understand how Radiation works and not listen to the bullshit propaganda.Truth be known that cellphone you and I use might give off more Radiation then we will see from this LOL so if you are that paranoid then here is what you do. Turn off your electronic stuff get rid of it stop eating foods stop going out in the sun hell just stop living because all Radiations are around us its just part of life. DO NOT be Swayed by false idiots! Educate your self learn more seek out the truth…you will see we are all going to be okay

    • mike says:

      Your probably the same wanker who thinks gmo is a great thing and is healthy for you. If radiation is such a pfft for you then explain chernobyl still unlivable after decades ? Hiroshima and Nagasaki still have problems from ww2. You are a Muppet if you think that the government or any elite business gives a flying f@%k about any of you. Keep eating your gmo turd nugget and when you are dying of some “new”desease 10 years from now you can day why me cause your to stupid to realize that the writing on the wall is just that Writing on the wall !! Can science explain the universe and all things definitively NOPE in fact science has been ‘re written many times due to us shattering theory after theory. So instead of blindly Following science to your grave maybe you should open Your little box top and ponder more instead of being so scientific. Science said the world was flat and the earth was the center of the universe and everyone believed it….. Don’t be one of those dumbasses !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  26. mkshft says:

    All the people clamning to be scientists in the comments are imposters, working for the government agencies trying to keep public in the dark

    • Nancy says:

      Please learn to spell. It’s “claiming” not “clamning”. It would also be nice if you learned to finish a sentence. How can I believe anything you say?

    • Alex Sulyman says:

      Really? I hope you’re kidding. I am an 18 year old high school student who is completely self educated on the topic of nuclear physics. In fact, much of my knowledge has come from hands on experimentation that I conduct myself.

      So no, I don’t only get my information from government mandated textbooks and government paid professors that are apparently feeding us incorrect information (this is sarcastic, most textbooks and professors, government mandated or not, ARE providing accurate information) to hide the “truth”

      Do I consider myself a scientist? Probably not, at least not by profession. I do, however, know enough science to tell you why all of this is bullshit.

      • Alex Sulyman says:

        Go ahead and read my other posts if you would like to see my explanations. Only then may you judge my credibility. Be warned though, make sure you are able to back your assertions up with cold hard facts.

      • Duncan says:

        That’s incorrect, most textbooks outside of pure mathematics do not provide ‘accurate information’ – perhaps you’re unaware of creationism? Or how incredibly one-sided all information in text books for schools are about biotechnology and transgenic crops?

  27. Middle East man says:

    do you really want us to feel sorry the american ? you must be kidding , we didnt feel sorry for Hiroshima , Nor Najazaki folks , dont expect me to feel sorry for them.

    • Rochelle says:

      Wow, you’re a giant douche

    • Bob Duboise says:

      we don’t want you to feel sorry for us Americans , We did not drop bombs on anyone , our corrupt government tells us only lies , and they tell the world only lies . The people don’t have a problem , nor do we hate anyone . You who are across the world , we do not know you . A group of powerful rich want war , because they hunger power and greed , We Americans want peace and love to all , including yourself . there is no blood on my hands and I support no war . I live in peace and I want peace for my children . And my heart is sad for all casualty’s of governments gone mad . Please do not believe that we the people are one with the government . We cannot stop what these madmen do , we live for our family’s and we do not know you or hate you . We wish you happiness all over the world , just as we wish for ourselves , we are all the same people , children of the world . Only governments and bankers want war and death . I am very sorry to the world , but I cannot stop them , I try to educate as many people as I can and spread love , but I am only one man that cares for all life . I am sorry to you and all people of the world and very ashamed of our government

  28. Graham says:

    sheri hall

    captainentropy
    PEOPLE! You all need to understand a few simple things. “International Journal of Health Services” is not a credible journal. It’s not indexed in Pubmed – the leading index of medical and scientific literature – and it’s not indexed in the Journal Citation Reports. The JCR analyzes, indexes, and ranks 8,471 medical and scientific journals. The IJHS is NOT ONE OF THEM. Therefore the “data” included in there is not credible. I’m a scientist. I also study ionizing radiation induced DNA repair. I know a little bit about science, publishing, and radiation biology (and this whole article written by an ignorant hack is utter bullshit). There are probably fewer than 200 journals I would consider reputable places to publish research. If it’s not ranked in over 8,000 journals then that is all that really needs to be said about its credibility. So, what’s in the the article is irrelevant. A blog post is of indistinguishable quality relative to this garbage article. Now, the authors run the Radiation and Public Health Project which has close to zero credibility among radiation scientists. And the authors of this “research” are not considered credible scholars. The only paper they’ve published on this topic that is indexed in Pubmed (found here http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22403909) was in the “International Journal of Health Services” which, by all measure from the JCR is a very low-impact journal of very low scholarly quality. The article itself was roundly criticized in responses published in the same journal. In other words, they aren’t credible, there work isn’t credible, and they’re publishing it in non-credible sources.

    Wow Misinformation. The Map Does NOT explain What the Colours Mean.Similar maps include a Explanation that the Colours Relate to the Predicted Height of Tsunami Waves After Earthquake.

    • Lindsey says:

      Could not agree more!!!! I’m an RN currently getting my Master’s in Public Health. KNOW YOUR SOURCES. People are too quick to read something and make a decision without educating themselves. Unless something is from a peer-reviewed reputable journal or a HON certified website which has to meet strict standards before publishing anything online – DON’T consider the info valid until you’ve done your own research….

  29. Snake says:

    Mars is more dangerously radioactive than the west coast right now, so I wouldn’t say it’s exactly a paradise for a radiophobe like you.

  30. Alex Sulyman says:

    First of all, if you people are so worried about radiation exposure, get yourself a geiger counter and check the levels for yourself. This isn’t some kind of mystery. There are plenty of private organizations monitoring radiation levels on the west coast that would have been on top of this the second radiation exposure increased above background levels. The government doesn’t run everything. It is true that some radioactive material (dust of radioactive isotopes, not just “radiation”) made it over the pacific, but this is old news, and has not, and will not cause any problems for us. You would likely get a higher dose of ionizing radiation by taking a plane ride or two than you would in a year of living on the coast for a year. You are being exposed to small amounts of ionizing radiation (electromagnetic) by looking at your computer right now. Old TV screens are even worse. Radiation is everywhere. Even bananas are slightly radioactive (potassium isotopes). Yet, none of this is going to give you cancer or make an arm grow out of your fucking face.

    Also, on that “one way trip to mars” you speak of, you would receive a higher dose of cosmic radiation than you would from any of this bullshit. Do your homework before trying to stir up controversy with this conspiracy theorist crap.

    And by the way, for those of you hearing anything about “china syndrome,” (mentioned in another article) realize that this is a fake, completely made up idea that was invented in a hollywood movie. Radioactive materials can’t just fall into the earth and irradiate everyone on the planet. That is truly one of the stupidest ideas I have ever heard, and it sickens me that anyone would believe this.

    • Duncan says:

      This is a good site to keep track of readings. I assume the one case scenario where we would start worrying is if there is an explosion releasing massive quantities of radiation into the air, which this website would show quite quickly. As these readings all continue to be normal I assume other than taking preparations like emergency supplies, iodine pills stocked, etc., there isn’t much else to do. There is lots of help going on over there at the moment. Is it really wise though to support any further nuclear stations being developed in regions like this?

    • mkshft says:

      Keep your ignorant shit to yourself… And educate yourself.. china syndrome is a concept rooted in reality.. hollywood made a movie about it they didn’t think the thing up you fucking moron.. when your children have thyroid cancer we’ll see who was right…

      • Alex Sulyman says:

        Ignorant shit? This is not an opinion buddy, simply stating scientific facts. Feel free to cross reference anything I say with a reliable source. I’m not one to make things up.

        Let me tell you a FEW of the reasons China Syndrome is simply fiction:

        First of all, the reactor core (now corium “lava”) would first need to make it through feet thick of concrete (which would eventually happen) and once it makes it through, the corium would likely dissipate into the soil penetrating not even 1% in depth into the earth’s crust before it cools down and solidifies.

        Let’s say it somehow did not cool down and progressed towards the core of the earth. Well, the core of our earth is FULL of uranium. Thousands of tons of it. In fact, the core of our earth is essentially one huge nuclear fission reactor (georeactor). The heat produced by these reactions is actually what keeps the center of the earth so hot.

        Also, simple physics tells us that the reactor core (which would have mixed with all of the other materials in the earth’s core by now) would stop at the center of the earth, and simply remain at rest there for the rest of eternity. This is because the net gravitational force at the center of mass of the earth (which is somewhat near the geometrical center of the earth) is zero. So, there is no way that it could make it all the way to china (hence the name) because the nuclear material would just sit in the middle of the earth along with the (and I do emphasize this) THOUSANDS of tons of radioactive Uranium, Thorium, Potassium, and other isotopes that are necessary to support life on earth.

        So to answer anyone’s question, no, China Syndrome is a complete bullshit theory. I wouldn’t even call it a theory, sounds more like a joke to me. A dumb joke.

        • JackDean says:

          Nice, your definition of the China Syndrome is completely ridiculous.
          What a fantastical strawman!

          All the China Syndrome says is that the corium will sink until it reaches the water table and may cause a steam explosion.

          High temperatures destroy concrete, so it won’t be much of a barrier to the corium.
          Add the highly corrosive saltwater bath that’s being sued to cool the reactors and the steel and concrete doesn’t have a chance.

          • Alex Sulyman says:

            My definition is completely ridiculous? Apparently I am not well informed on FICTIONAL nuclear meltdown scenarios…sorry about that. But in all seriousness, I apologize if your definition of China Syndrome is different, I was just going by the definition that the name implies, which I hope most find pretty far fetched…If you want to point me to a reliable source describing China Syndrome, that would be great, I am genuinely interested. Seems that my online research has pointed me to the definition that I have described.

            What you are describing sounds just like nuclear contamination to me, which of course is entirely possible. The steam explosion part? I personally have never heard of it, and it does sound somewhat possible, so I will not question it’s validity (nor will I accept it).

            And yes concrete does break down under heat, however, provided that the concrete is thick enough, the concrete will provide fantastic protection against the corium until it finally (if it even reaches this far) reaches the soil, where it will likely disperse and solidify. Contamination to underground water? Very possible. Steam explosions? Again, possible, but doesn’t sound terribly likely to me. This also doesn’t sound like the China Syndrome that I have heard of, but hey, what do I know?

    • Rog says:

      I have to agree here folks do research for your self you will see that Alex as well as a few others are right and plus look hard in to the story the Science does not add up

    • connie says:

      Thank-you Alex You said that with Finesse,all the things popping up to start people panicking is getting out of control. Wagon train i tell ya,simple life.

  31. An Engineer says:

    All this is not really new news or that shocking. If you know anything about Nuclear power dangers then this is expected…Also it’s not the Japanese fault. They didn’t cause the 9.0 quake, yet I hate how the article implies that the Japanese are killing Americans.

    To the writer: You know that WWII has been over for a few decades right? And that the US and Japanese have peace treaties? Because honestly the title and the beginning content is rather insulting.

    Also while this was horrible event , nothing, NOTHING could of withstood that tsunami.
    No matter if the plant had been brand new, in tip top shape, made by the US, Japan, China or Russia, there would of been a problem. Proof: Water (not sea water which is slightly heavier and denser) weights 62.42lb per cubic foot. The tsunami of 2011 reached as high as 128ft-133ft depending where you look. But if you dropped 1’x1’x128′ of water; the area below it would be hit with around 7989lb*ft/s^2. And this is only counting for a small slice (1’x1’x128′) of a tsunami that was many many feet wide and deep. A tsunami that had enough force to travel 6 miles inland and destroy/damaged over 1 million buildings. And Fukushima was pretty much right in the front of it.

    Many nations have Nuclear Power Plants by the ocean or large rivers and lakes. This is because the water is needed for cooling the nuclear reactors that run around 300*C. That I think is a more major issue that should be addressed- “alternative ways to cool a nuclear reactor”- so that if it leak, it’s not into a water source.
    Or perhaps “ways to clean up radiation” would be another good topic- get attention onto that instead of – “Oh my God the Japanese, I mean Fukushima poisoned everything!”

    All my sources are credible and if you want I can any site any of the sources I used for the information above.

  32. JackDean says:

    David H

    JackDean

    Brian
    The only way to avoid radiation through water is distilled water. Regular filtration absolutely does not rid of radioactive material.

    That’s doesn’t get rid of tritium….

    The drinking limit of tritium is really high at 20,00 pCi/L and it removes itself after about 30 days and has a very low gamma emission.
    I bet you having fun trolling the people on this site since you feel the need to post about everything and your facts may have some scientific backing they are completely biased and skewed.
    And on that note this article is absurd and hilarious to read.
    And yes people bananas have radioactive material in them, K-40, which is naturally occurring and has been since before we knew about radiation.

    Tritium is chemically lethal to dividing cells. And it is mutagenic. Because of the extra neutrons, the out electrons are pushed outwards and the element is much more chemically active than normal hydrogen. And as to the body ridding itself of tritium in 30 days, that assumes you don’t keep eating in your food. The concentration in the body follows a log curve. And I would guess that 30 days is the biological half life of tritium. the time it takes the body expel half of it. the body doesn’t rid itself of anything in finite amount of time, so your statement doesn’t make sense.

    You folks are so hung up on the radiation, you ignore the fact that most of these compounds are heavy metals that cause extensive chemical and mutagenic damage on their own.

    I bet you having fun trolling the people on this site since you feel the need to post about everything and your facts may have some scientific backing they are completely biased and skewed.

    So you accept that science is valid, but you just don’t like it.

    I can understand that.

  33. Lacoconut says:

    And what about the people in Japan?

  34. David H says:

    JackDean

    Brian
    The only way to avoid radiation through water is distilled water. Regular filtration absolutely does not rid of radioactive material.

    That’s doesn’t get rid of tritium….

    The drinking limit of tritium is really high at 20,00 pCi/L and it removes itself after about 30 days and has a very low gamma emission.

    I bet you having fun trolling the people on this site since you feel the need to post about everything and your facts may have some scientific backing they are completely biased and skewed.

    And on that note this article is absurd and hilarious to read.

    And yes people bananas have radioactive material in them, K-40, which is naturally occurring and has been since before we knew about radiation.

    • JackDean says:

      You’ve made the very clear and direct assumption that the more than 300 tons on 1.1 million bcq / liter water that flows out of Fukushima every day is evenly diluted throughout the pacific ocean.

      You’ve repeated that directly implied assumption in your recent reply.

      This is a deceptive and misleading assumption.
      It sounds reasonable on the surface and is designed to make fools of folks that don’t see the sleight of hand your performing.
      And I think you know you’re being deceptive.
      What do you get out lying about this?

  35. SnopesBro says:

    Snopes says ya lying.. All hail mighty snopes

  36. NitroBurns says:

    Also, please take into consideration how many Asian countries INCLUDING CHINA, that have stopped purchasing shellfish from Alaska, West Canada, Washington, Oregon, and California. They claim it is because of some sea bacteria contaminating it ALL! Coincidence? I think not!

  37. sheri hall says:

    captainentropy
    PEOPLE! You all need to understand a few simple things. “International Journal of Health Services” is not a credible journal. It’s not indexed in Pubmed – the leading index of medical and scientific literature – and it’s not indexed in the Journal Citation Reports. The JCR analyzes, indexes, and ranks 8,471 medical and scientific journals. The IJHS is NOT ONE OF THEM. Therefore the “data” included in there is not credible. I’m a scientist. I also study ionizing radiation induced DNA repair. I know a little bit about science, publishing, and radiation biology (and this whole article written by an ignorant hack is utter bullshit). There are probably fewer than 200 journals I would consider reputable places to publish research. If it’s not ranked in over 8,000 journals then that is all that really needs to be said about its credibility. So, what’s in the the article is irrelevant. A blog post is of indistinguishable quality relative to this garbage article. Now, the authors run the Radiation and Public Health Project which has close to zero credibility among radiation scientists. And the authors of this “research” are not considered credible scholars. The only paper they’ve published on this topic that is indexed in Pubmed (found here http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22403909) was in the “International Journal of Health Services” which, by all measure from the JCR is a very low-impact journal of very low scholarly quality. The article itself was roundly criticized in responses published in the same journal. In other words, they aren’t credible, there work isn’t credible, and they’re publishing it in non-credible sources.

  38. Ryk E. Spoor says:

    Utter, utter bullshit. You could dump the ENTIRE REACTOR COMPLEX into the Pacific Ocean and the amount of radiation it would add to the ocean as a whole would be utterly irrelevant to your health.

    DILUTION, people. It means something. The oceans are HUGE. The calculations done by people who actually KNOW what radiation is and what it does shows that Fukushima isn’t even going to significantly raise the amount of radiation in the fish at any reasonable range from the reactor. The BEACHES not far from Fukushima are still reasonably safe to swim in.

    Understand the scale you’re looking at. “Thousands of gallons” of radioactive water” sounds real scary, until you understand that (A) 90%+ of that water is still just ordinary water, it’s just mixed with radioactive stuff, and (B) that it isn’t a drop in a bucket, but a drop into a thousand Olympic-sized swimming pools. A thousand gallons is about four cubic meters of liquid. You’re dumping into THE PACIFIC OCEAN. An ocean thousands of kilometers across, with an average depth of four THOUSAND meters — four kilometers. ONE cubic kilometer is a BILLION cubic meters, or diluting a thousand gallons by a factor of about two hundred and fifty MILLION. And the total volume of the Pacific is over one hundred sixty MILLION cubic kilometers.

    This is roughly like finding out someone farted in California and being afraid you’ll smell it in New York City. You’re in more danger from the radiation in that bunch of bananas on the counter than you ever will be from Fukushima, unless you go on a tour group into the reactor.

    • NitroBurns says:

      Ryk you are an ignorant ass. If you think you can dump millions of TONS of contaminated water into the ocean every day for more than a year, with no ill effects, you sir are an asshole with no knowledge of the ocean and your post should be deleted out of stupidity alone. Any person on here defending the Fukashima fallout and radioactive contamination, either has an interest in the cover up, or is just blind and ill-informed. Japan has literally destroyed humanities chance at a radiation safe world. Nuclear reactors are the stupidest form of power in the world. Such a shame. Argue if you will, but only time will be the truth. I hope for humanities sake, it is all untrue and we really live in some fantasy hologram where everything will be ok, but I have my doubts about that one.
      Peace Through Superior Ganja!

    • Paula Goldfish says:

      Thanks for taking the time to inform people!

    • JackDean says:

      That of course assumes that we can ignore the biology of the oceans.

      If we had a dead planet in which life did not actively concentrate these isotopes as if they were nutrients, then this would be a completely accurate way to view this.

      But we do have plankton actively seeking out an absorbing the radioactive salts, because they chemically resemble nutrients that the plankton has evolved to absorb as nutrients.

      This is why the dilution argument doesn’t fit.

      • Ryk E. Spoor says:

        Actually, it still applies. The radioactive material has to REACH the plankton to be absorbed. So the plankton that eats the radioactive material will be similarly widely distributed, and while they concentrate the radioactives, well, again, DO THE MATH. They can’t concentrate it enough to make it a threat outside of the immediate area; the really dangerous amounts of radiation also decay fairly quickly (and that happens just as much inside the plankton as outside). THERE IS ALREADY VASTLY MORE RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL IN THE OCEAN than Fukushima has, or ever could, put into it. VASTLY more. If it was that dangerously concentrated by plankton, we’d already all be dead.

        As far as the heavy metals, again, do the math. The amount of heavy metals *already* present in the ocean is orders of magnitude greater than the entire Fukushima plant has in it — construction materials and all.

        This is a matter of *scale*. You have to grasp just how tiny, tiny, tiny Fukushima, or indeed any individual human construction, is on the scale of the Earth and even its biosphere. Our effect on the climate, for instance, doesn’t come from one, two, or even a hundred coal-fired plants, but from THOUSANDS upon thousands of them operating 24/7 around the world, dumping millions of tons of waste into the atmosphere. And even then, the effect is small enough so far that people can argue themselves into thinking it isn’t there.

        One industrial accident simply isn’t that dangerous on a planetary scale (and if you want something in Japan to affect the US, you’re talking planetary scale).

    • An Engineer says:

      Love your reply. And I totally agree.

    • jco says:

      Sorry but that is not how it works. Radioactive remains radioactive. A fish eats something radioactive there migrates here. The food chain doesn’t work that way. They have indeed found radioactive fish here, sea lions, bears are growing tumors and hair loss. You are what you eat and what it eats.

    • mkshft says:

      You should educate yourself about the topic before publicly spewing laughably errous information with such vigor and cofidence.

  39. todd day says:

    All red lobster fish is from japan and china, theres your heads up

  40. Humans should have never been dealing with nuclear energy, we are not advanced enough for it. If there is no way to neutralize it for 80,000 years, we should have never been using it in the first place. What a nasty thing to do to future generations! If there are any after this extinction level event, of course.

    • An Engineer says:

      Yea, humans are still a stupid race. However we stupid people demand a thing called electrical energy. You need it for your phone. My great-grandmother needs it for her pace-maker. Bob over there needs it for life-support and I need it for my online games. We can’t get enough power through coal (not to mention the long term affects of coal are just as bad as nuclear ones….) so we have to look at other ways to produce power. If you take the same amount of coal to uranium – say 1 gram of each – that amount of uranium produces 3.7million times more power. So power produced by 1 gram of uranium = power produced by 8,157lbs of coal.
      And “an extinction level event”? Really? While humans and wild-life did suffer this is not a “extinction level event”. An “extinction level event” would be if half or more the planet was dead.

    • Alex Sulyman says:

      Please, PLEASE, learn a LITTLE about a subject before you bash it. Nuclear energy is BY FAR one of the cleanest, most efficient sources of energy. We are plenty advanced enough for it, it is just that the public freaks out whenever they hear the word “nuclear” because they didn’t pay attention in their high school physics classes.

    • pst says:

      Shut down the Sun then.

  41. captainentropy says:

    Sorry, I meant to say the “The International Journal of Medicine” wasn’t indexed in Pubmed. And it is NOT a credible source of information. The “International Journal of Health Services” is ranked very low and is effectively inconsequential as far as research journals go.

  42. captainentropy says:

    PEOPLE! You all need to understand a few simple things. “International Journal of Health Services” is not a credible journal. It’s not indexed in Pubmed – the leading index of medical and scientific literature – and it’s not indexed in the Journal Citation Reports. The JCR analyzes, indexes, and ranks 8,471 medical and scientific journals. The IJHS is NOT ONE OF THEM. Therefore the “data” included in there is not credible. I’m a scientist. I also study ionizing radiation induced DNA repair. I know a little bit about science, publishing, and radiation biology (and this whole article written by an ignorant hack is utter bullshit). There are probably fewer than 200 journals I would consider reputable places to publish research. If it’s not ranked in over 8,000 journals then that is all that really needs to be said about its credibility. So, what’s in the the article is irrelevant. A blog post is of indistinguishable quality relative to this garbage article. Now, the authors run the Radiation and Public Health Project which has close to zero credibility among radiation scientists. And the authors of this “research” are not considered credible scholars. The only paper they’ve published on this topic that is indexed in Pubmed (found here http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22403909) was in the “International Journal of Health Services” which, by all measure from the JCR is a very low-impact journal of very low scholarly quality. The article itself was roundly criticized in responses published in the same journal. In other words, they aren’t credible, there work isn’t credible, and they’re publishing it in non-credible sources.

  43. david says:

    According to the people who made the image you’re using (http://www.asrltd.com/japan/plume.php):

    “We use a Lagrangian particles dispersal method to track where free floating material (fish larvae, algae, phytoplankton, zooplankton…) present in the sea water near the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station plant could have gone since the earthquake on March 11th. THIS IS NOT A REPRESENTATION OF THE RADIOACTIVE PLUME CONCENTRATION.”

  44. Mary says:

    So basically, its dont eat, starve, and die, or eat and die from radiation? Wow. Decisions decisions..

  45. fuck you says:

    http://www.nbcnews.com/video/nightly-news/53696470

    STARFISH ARE DEAD IN THE MILLIONS ON THE WEST COAST OF THE US of A. THIS IS NOT CORRELATED TO RADIATION AT ALL. IT IS SIMPLY STARFISH WASTING SYNDROME. MAKES SOOOO MUCH SENSE.

  46. Michael R Finley says:

    can we protect ourselves with iodine?

  47. Jessica says:

    Oh my, I’m sorry that you are not well versed in how radiation works, Jeromie. I am also sorry that you are so easily susceptible to all these fake “information” sites that popped up soon after this disaster. Is your mind so easily swayed? If so, you need to step back and think about the kind of person that you are. Spreading rhetoric and lies makes one a terrible person. There has been absolutely no related deaths due to the fukushima disaster in the USA. I dare you to find one case from a CREDIBLE, and well established source of information. This comes from the CDC themselves. It took me all of 30 seconds to find it.

    “Do the nuclear reactors in Japan currently pose a risk to workers in the U.S. and its Territories?

    The NRC has indicated that all the available information continues to indicate Hawaii, Alaska, the U.S. Territories and the U.S. West Coast are not expected to experience any harmful levels of radioactivity. In theory, the primary issue of potential exposure would be from residual radioactive dust particles in the air (“fallout”) dispersed by atmospheric winds across the ocean. It is unlikely that the fallout will be detectable in the U.S or territories except by air sampling and analytic methods capable of detecting background levels (and thus capable of finding even small but not harmful increases above background levels).”

    ACTUAL SOURCE: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/radiation/WorkerInfo.html

    It’s funny how the link to the “International Journal of Medicine” links to a private site that does not link any credible source of information. Perhaps you are doing this to make money? What a crappy way to make money.

    Here is some actual information for all you people who do not know how to use the internet:

    http://health.hawaii.gov/about/files/2013/06/aug2013.pdf

    And here’s something from Surfline. I don’t know about you, but as a surfer, I’d much rather trust Surfline than all these BLOG sites.

    http://www.surfline.com/surf-science/fukushima-radiation-faq_101802/

    Good Day.

    • Jocelyn Amber Potts says:

      “Is your mind so easily swayed?”

      I don’t believe everything in this article, but I also wouldn’t take everything the government shares with the public at full face, either.
      To blindly believe that they would be 100% honest in sharing their findings is ignorant.
      They are just as likely to lie to the public as a fake news site is to publish a bogus article.

      Practice what you preach.

      • Aaron b says:

        I totally agree, these so called “credible” sources of journalism and anything affiliated with our government cannot and shouldn’t be taken as credible. When it comes down to it we all could agree on the amount of bullshit they feed us. Politics and money like to sleep with each other on the reg and your the one they cheat on. And you wouldn’t believe they would lie to you just like when your boyfriend/girlfriend swears to god they would never cheat on you. Japan has a serious situation going on and everybody needs to pay attention because the earth is all we have. Unless your going to mars

    • Tim Ross says:

      Thank you Jessica for lowering my BP. Love, The Oldman Of Da Sea

    • ashish Gavali says:

      sorry, You Jessica are the one that is mis-informed, unfortunately you won’t care until you and your kids suffer the consequences for ignorance, you won’t be alone so you will have company, it’s people like you that have helped this happen, but you will blame everyone else once the fit hits the shan, wise up, I wish you no harm, but with eyes closed that is what will happen, good luck.

      • JackDean says:

        ashish Gavali
        sorry, You Jessica are the one that is mis-informed, unfortunately you won’t care until you and your kids suffer the consequences for ignorance, you won’t be alone so you will have company, it’s people like you that have helped this happen, but you will blame everyone else once the fit hits the shan, wise up, I wish you no harm, but with eyes closed that is what will happen, good luck.

        Ashish Gavali, these folks are paid minimum wage to troll blogs and post this dribble.

        Internet PR is a big business.

        They don’t care if millions of babies are born deformed because of Fukushima, They are making their money, and doing what they are told to do.

        they have a script, and they must follow it if they are going to get paid.

        • gnuorder says:

          All the world’s scientist are conspiring against you personally. Jessica just got caught up into it because she has an understanding of basic science and the ability to reason. Don’t come down on the poor girl too hard.

        • Aaron b says:

          I’m with you ! It’s scary people are so quick to dis credit something yet be so apathetic with the entire situation.

    • An Engineer says:

      I love you. Really. This is like my reply. However I didn’t get far after the intro (I did read all of it but when writing my reply I though of the beginning of the article and went from there. I didn’t even get to the last half)

    • mkshft says:

      you need to question what kind of person you are..- the kind has no brain and belives bullshit

  48. lahela_xoxo says:

    How credible is this man writing this findings?

  49. Michael Mariani says:

    Ironic how this article ends… Settlers to Mars will be exposed to even more radiation from the trip to the red planet alone XD

  50. Gaia Sagrada says:

    Fukushima is an extinction level event but no one is really calling it that yet. It should be called that though. The Pacific Ocean is dead now, people in California are getting sick, people in japan are getting sick… And its spreading all over the world, slowly but surely.

    • captainentropy says:

      No one calls it that, because it’s NOT, you idiot.

      You will get more radiation from the next banana you eat that will from Fukushima. How can you be so stupid?

  51. Howie says:

    You guys are a bunch of stupid asses.. See you tommorrow morons!

  52. Syntar1323 says:

    This story is complete and utter bullshit. The radiation had since dissipated and adsorbed into the ocean. There is some trace left of it, but it’s the same level as we get through the sun, completely harmless.

  53. DGSE says:

    First off to anyone who has been paying attention to this horrific insane manmade disaster, not the “earthquake” and what followed, but the insanity of the Nuke Industry and these GE reactors ‘blowing up’, knows that the photo above does not represent the radioactive ocean plume, this photo has been misrepresented all across the net, especially on YT, but it does not really matter. That is not to say the radiation has not hit our shores as it has, and yes certain govt agencies are running around taking samples and recording events, and then “getting f*&k out of Dodge”. The radiation poisoning of marine life from the coasts of Alaska down thru BC Canada to Oregon is now fully documented. Those who live on the coast and go for walks when the tide goes out can see the devastation.
    As for some of the recommendations, they are not that far fetched, unfortunatly “filtered water” will not help much, if you get our water from a lake or above ground res. Underground water is the only safe water these days, and that will be time-exed over the years concerning some isotopes.
    As with ALL of these nuke sites the Pro Nuke shills are just to funny in their inaine stupidity. My favorite is the “Health Physics prof” of 25 years who can not spell. “iodo” LMAO.
    ENENews has some great advice for protecting yourself as much a possible. I enjoyed the intelligent posts. ie “jackdean”
    Take care everybody, heres to living in a 1970’s disaster movie.

    • Mike Sandford says:

      lolz. This would be a pretty terrible movie! You’re going to get more radiation from your countertop than you ever will from Fukushima.

  54. Martin Grohmann says:

    Defenitely hard stuff – as hard as the fact that there are about 300,000,000 private weapans curculating in the hands of USA citizens with all kind of states of mind and mental illmesses – well hidden too – Good Luck Amerika – and wanting us to believe that Cuba a thread to the world – gdfbs this is : God save Cuba and may he fuck Obama

  55. Nick says:

    So let me get this straight. The one way trip to mars, a planet with virtually NO atmosphere to protect us from solar winds that contain FAR more radiation than you could possibly produce from a nuclear power plant, seems favorable? 1) washing your food does not get rid of radiation 2) You would also need to be aware of where the fertilizer for the soil is coming from not just the food along with so many other things like pesticides. 3) You should probably care more about radiation levels from the sun on your skin 4) Can’t really argue with filtered water but I assure you it will not get rid of radiation.

  56. Manuel says:

    I do not understand this alarm. The president of my country (S-pain) has said that there is no danger at all in Fukushima, and that the fear is unfounded. Believe the politicians! They never lie.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.es/2013/10/03/rajoy-fukushima-temores-infundados_n_4034508.html

  57. Tony says:

    cool, so that would mean just half of us die ???

  58. Paulie Walnuts says:

    Filtering radioactivity out of drinking water. . . Wow. Is it a Britta filter that does that? Stupidity is rampant.

  59. the boss says:

    Whoever wrote this article needs to be shot. Straight nonsense

  60. perry says:

    find someone who thinks we’re all gonna die, find someone who thinks there’s nothing to worry about, meet in the middle, and you’ll usually find the truth there. that’s what i’ve learned

  61. johndburger says:

    10 seconds of googling shows that the image appears to be from here:

    http://www.asrltd.com/japan/plume.php

    This is from a =simulation=. It’s not actual measurements of anything. The text of that page says:

    “THIS IS NOT A REPRESENTATION OF THE RADIOACTIVE PLUME CONCENTRATION. Since we do not know exactly how much contaminated water and at what concentration was released into the ocean, it is impossible to estimate the extent and dilution of the plume.”

    The emphasis is in the original. So when the current article describes the image as “showing you the flow of radiation from the Fukushima nuclear plant”, it’s a complete lie. Note that there are effectively no links to supporting evidence here, but lots of links to ads.

  62. Fando Kos says:

    Can you please send to me where did you get this information, I’m interested in verify every note I see.

  63. Tritium says:

    Do not be fooled by this article, the U.S and Canada are perfectly safe from any radiation in Japan. This site and thousands of others often write provoking material to entice readers to their websites. This web traffic generates income from advertising.

  64. Roger S. says:

    This isn’t a “conspiracy theory”, either –
    That was NOT an earthquake that caused the tsunami on 3-11-2012.
    It was caused by a seabed planted nuclear device pretty much aimed at bringing an expected tsunami effect directly into the Fukushima nuclear plant.
    Japan wasn’t playing along with the financial plan mandated to them by the European ‘powers that be’ and had to be dealt with.
    Names on the suspect list are: Libyan ambassador Christopher Stevens (he’s gone now, no need to worry about him talking), Benjamin Netanyahu (untouchable), Tony Blair (retired), and the head of the Jesuit arm of the Vatican, Klaus von Holvenbach.
    Don’t take my word for this…do your homework.
    If I am wrong about all this, then great. I don’t want to believe it either, like so many other treacherous things happening all over the world that we never hear about.

    • perry says:

      you are stating a theory about a conspiracy, so it is a conspiracy theory.
      now, before anyone argues, let’s analyze the meaning of the phrase.
      What is a conspiracy? a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful according to a google search.
      what is a theory? Theory is a contemplative and rational type of abstract or generalizing thinking, or the results of such thinking, once again, this is according to a google search.
      so basically, a conspiracy theory is a contemplative and rational type of abstract or generalizing thinking about a secret plan by a group to cause harm or break laws.
      Now, the reason conspiracy theorists get filed into the “crazy” cabinet is because nobody wants to believe that their government could do harm. A perfect example is Nazi Germany. those people had no idea what was really going on. Do you really think Hitler would have had the love of his country if they knew exactly what he was up to? of course, that’s also debatable but that’s an argument for another day. the point still stands, governments can be evil and do evil things. anyways, that’s enough rambling for now, it’s late and i’ve almost forgotten what i’m commenting about. hopefully it’s an interesting read for someone. nighty night everyone. have fun debating on something that you can’t control. isnt’ that funny? we fight and squabble over silly things that are beyond our reach to control.

  65. Partl says:

    … just in case, u might get me wrong. We are working with that force for what… about 100 years now? How would you possibly know, what impact those “small doses” gonna have at the 3rd and 4th generation? – You really wanna tell me, you can ensure us all, you know? Sorry, you anin’t much of an scientist, thinking like that.

    Science never knows – it always goes on searching and finding… never comming to an end. You know – this world has been flat once?

  66. mont says:

    Ryan
    We actually did a calculation about this today in class. The only isotope that was found to be above unsafe levels in the water DIRECTLY next to the plant was Cs-137. It wasn’t even that much higher than the safe level, around 1.3* the safe level. There is no way this activity could have stayed that concentrated even within a few miles of the plant. This is completely false. He presents no data, no analysis, only biased unscientific claims.
    I am a nuclear engineer, I know what I’m talking about.

    Was that in 2nd or 3rd grade?

  67. mont says:

    Brett
    Crap from the ass of a Bulls ass! I happen to be a Health Physics professional (25 years), work on the west coast and actually see the environmental samples that are taken on our coast. None of what I have seen since the accident supports anything in this article. I in fact personally know colleagues and NRC Inspectors that work in Japan at and around the site. But don’t listen to me…listen to the idiot with the most fear in their voice speaking the loudest. Not a single person in the US will ever be impacted one ioda (if that is a real word) from this accident. There hasn’t even been a death or illness related to radiation exposure at the actual site of the accident! Liars!!! Fear mongoring liars!!!

    So you admittedly work for the system and you expect me to believe your crap?B.S.

    • melissaspower says:

      And you get your money from whom? Whose bread I eat, his song I sing?

    • Bob Spittler says:

      The word is “iota”, prof…from the Greek alphabet…and you sound just about as cocksure of yourself as the fright peddler who wrote this tract….the fact is that Fukushima is anything but a joke and the radiation does in fact have the potential of spreading airborne and on sea currents even if so far there have been no unambiguously verifiable instances of death or radiation poisoning along the left coast. That does not rule out the possibility that it will visit.
      It also seems, if I recall, that it is a radioactive isotope of iodine that is the threat-culprit for now and if anyone is concerned about radiation poisoning, might I suggest going to your nearest health food store and obtaining ground kelp in a shaker and seasoning your food with it rather than buying up all the iodine tablets on the shelf and slamming them all down which will probably do more harm than the radiation as it can traumatize your body chemistry to slam dunk iodine tablets like that. Eat kelp—it’s good for you and it is thoroughly checked for radiation.

    • captainentropy says:

      That’s right, ignore the experts. They spent all that time learning and researching and learning some more just so they could try to pull a fast one on you. You’re so clever. Nothing gets past you does it?

      How about if you have severe abdominal pains and you’re vomiting blood just ask the fry cook at your local McDonalds. MD degrees mean jack when you can deep-fry potatoes. Car won’t start? Why not ask a three year old how to fix it? Need tax advice? I’m sure your local crack-head will be just as good as a CPA or tax lawyer.

  68. Daniel Ve says:

    Mars has tons of radiation…

  69. Ryan says:

    We actually did a calculation about this today in class. The only isotope that was found to be above unsafe levels in the water DIRECTLY next to the plant was Cs-137. It wasn’t even that much higher than the safe level, around 1.3* the safe level. There is no way this activity could have stayed that concentrated even within a few miles of the plant. This is completely false. He presents no data, no analysis, only biased unscientific claims.

    I am a nuclear engineer, I know what I’m talking about.

    • JackDean says:

      On June 8th, 2013, TEPCO reported radioactive cesium levels in the seas near the #2 reactor, at 27,000 becquerels per liter.

      Is this a level that you consider safe? Would you drink this water?

      • JackDean says:

        Before you answer, remember that that our muscle tissues will preferentially retain cesium over potassium.

        So if you drink a liter of this water, your radiation exposure over time will be cumulative, and not a one time exposure. After a week, this one drink of water will expose you to approximately 4,536,000 becquerels of radiation.

        And keep in mind that migratory fish like tuna, swim by the plant every year. These fish can live for 50 years, and each year they will accumulate more radioactive isotopes in their muscles. Each year, their meat becomes more and more radioactive.

    • Anonymous as well says:

      So the “nuclear engineer” did a calculation in a classroom, eh? For somebody who supposedly is an nuclear engineer–or any kind of an engineer for that matter–one would expect the engineer to have a better command of punctuation, considering the education requirements.

      It seems more likely that Ryan and Brett are shills.

      • JackDean says:

        Like many nuke advocates, they pretend that all radiation exposure is external. They ignore the fact that that the radioactive isotopes getting into air water and soil. And so we consume them.

        Rather than being exposed for a short time to external radiation, we continue to be bombarded to ever increasing levels of radiation from inside our bodies, inside our cells where the damage is amplified and ongoing.

  70. Brett says:

    Crap from the ass of a Bulls ass! I happen to be a Health Physics professional (25 years), work on the west coast and actually see the environmental samples that are taken on our coast. None of what I have seen since the accident supports anything in this article. I in fact personally know colleagues and NRC Inspectors that work in Japan at and around the site. But don’t listen to me…listen to the idiot with the most fear in their voice speaking the loudest. Not a single person in the US will ever be impacted one ioda (if that is a real word) from this accident. There hasn’t even been a death or illness related to radiation exposure at the actual site of the accident! Liars!!! Fear mongoring liars!!!

  71. Cal Jennings says:

    Just because it’s happening doesn’t mean it’s not a conspiracy. I think you meant conspiracy theory. Not all “conspiracy theories” are incorrect. Those who know science and physics along with demolition know that the buildings were brought down using demolition, otherwise the steel beams would have bent, not come straight down. Take a look at some pictures of steel structures at refineries where the temperatures were much hotter and the fuel was much more abundant.

    • buff619 says:

      They DID bend. Not only were eyewitnesses reporting that at least one of the towers was leaning significantly, but there is well documented footage showing it coming down at an angle. On top of that, there is footage that clearly shows the exterior beams slowly bending in and then giving way.

      Seriously, this whole “demolition” argument is nothing but a distraction and misuse of time and resources that could be used towards exposing the government involvement. It’s just as bad as the “no planes hit the towers” theory. All it does is hurt the movement.

  72. Vexin says:

    I dont believe this…..The Pacific is over 7,000kms wide, with and averge depth of 7-8km.
    There is no way that major contamination with happen. I hold a different opinion, but I understand the concern.

    • JackDean says:

      That argument only fits, if you assume the Ocean is lifeless. That these chemicals don’t enter the food chain.

      The radioactive isotopes are taken up by plankton and kelp, then concentrate as they work their way up the food chain. Cesium concentrates in the muscles, plutonium, uranium and polonium tend to concentrate in the fatty tissues.

      Animals excrete these isotopes very slowly. This is why tuna in California is testing positive for radioactive Cesium from Fukushima.

  73. JackDean says:

    Some background on Chernobyl and Norway.
    Just like the US response to Fukushima, Norway made the radiation safe, by simply increasing the legal limits for radiation found in food. They made it legal to sell food that has significantly higher levels of radiation.

    This had the effect of making the sale of radioactive foodstuff legal, but did not make it safer to eat.

    http://www.utexas.edu/courses/sami/dieda/socio/chernobyl.htm

  74. Fernand says:

    This is such a stupid lie!!! I dont understand how people can belive in this!! First of all, if its gonna contaminate the US that is far far away, it would be destroying japan and other near countries before! Second, cmon, it wasnt that much radioative as they are showing in the pictures, please do it more real in your photoshop! Yeah, please people, dont belive in everythin the stupid media says!!!!!

    • buff619 says:

      First off, the majority of mainland Japan is WEST, meaning that it is upwind and not in the path of the prevailing winds that flow EAST. Something tells me you failed at geography in school. Second, the only good thing we can take from this disaster is, at least a good chunk of people like you will bite the dust in the process.

      • Frank says:

        Haha, buff don’t be mean towards him because no one is buying this. Seriously, go back to photoshop and try again.

      • JackDean says:

        Except that for days before the event, the wind had been blowing West. It shifted direction hours before the reactor blew.

        that was a very lucky occurrence.

    • Scout says:

      Ever heard of rain?

  75. JackDean says:

    Kenneth
    And could have been much easier to verify if you’d linked your source. But I imagine it’s not a credible one, especially since you’re linking stillbirth stats of 4-8% – the last time Norway had a 4% infant mortality rate was in 1941. Here, let’s go by the norwegian Census then. The year /before/ Tchernobyl, Norway had a brief increase in infant mortaility to 8,5 in 1000. The year after, the year of the accident, the rate dropped back to 7.8. Next year, it increased again to 8.1.
    For the next /twenty years/, the infant mortality rate drops almost every year, until we’re now at 2,5 in 1000.
    As for the IQ testing study you don’t link but refer to, there are numerous problems with that one.
    First of all, that study was torn to very itty bitty little pieces by the rest of the scientific community, because 1) It was not a representative sample. 2) The national draft includes IQ testing, which did not in any way support the report. 3) The radiation levels needed to show any significant change in embryos were far higher (on the scale of hundreds of times) than the radiation they were exposed to. There’s a reason the study is mentioned only a very few times in media – because it’s not a story, it’s just bad science.

    I understand that it’s your job to claim that radiation is harmless. And that’s why you’re here telling everyone that eating radioactive foods is completely safe. I get that.

    So I’m not worried about convincing you. Even if I posted links to the papers, you still claim that radiation is harmless. And of course, that’s why you’re trying to discourage folks from looking into it on their own.

    I would like to see people do their own research. And Google is available to everyone that can see this site.

    • Kenneth says:

      This is not about radioactivity being harmless, it is about the scaremongering and trying to make a manageable problem into an unmanageable crisis. The challenge I put to you was to link /credible/ sources, not what google churns out on the top of the search list. The thing with the internet is that just about everyone can put information out there and postulate it as fact. Which is why I asked you to provide some form of reference to where you found numbers that claimed Norwegian stillbirths and infant mortality rates was ten times higher than in Afghanistan. Here are my sources. Please feel free to provide your own, and we’ll see which holds water the better.
      Infant mortality rates: http://brage.bibsys.no/ssb/bitstream/URN:NBN:no-bibsys_brage_17039/1/Kap6-Pedersen.pdf http://www.ssb.no/en/befolkning/statistikker/dode

      Study summary: http://www.sv.uio.no/psi/forskning/aktuelt/arrangementer/disputaser/2011/heiervang_kristin/vitenskapeligsammendrag.html
      Dispute articles: http://www.forskning.no/artikler/2011/juni/290209 http://www.adressa.no/meninger/article1485938.ece
      Own admission by Heiervang that the numbers, though statistically significant, had no real effect in daily life: http://www.sv.uio.no/psi/forskning/aktuelt/profiler/kristin-sverdvik-heiervang.html

      You’ll have to run some of them through your favored translation tool, as these are Norwegian sources.

      Again, I’m not saying radioactivity is all sunshine and unicorns, but there is such a thing as blowing things massively out of proportion. Which is exactly what this article is doing. By the way, Norway’s salmon export industry, one of the biggest in the world, coming in at some 3.3 billion NOK per year, has been feeding americans and the rest of the world for the past thirty years without interruption. We’ve been able to do that since the radiation in our seafood did not significantly increase due to Tchernobyl. In fact, the greatest source of radiation in our maritime food chain is nuclear testing from the 50s and 60s. (source: http://www.nrpa.no/dav/3783b30ce2.pdf )

      I’ll throw in an analysis from the north of our country too, an area rich with lichen and moss, which soaks radation very well. Read the report yourselves, and draw some conclusions based on scientific data from someone who’s been there before. And then remember that Fukushima is 17% of what Tchernobyl was.
      http://www.nrpa.no/dav/8126a79ec0.pdf

      • JackDean says:

        I appreciate the attacks, they are good.

        I’m not backing this article, because it does engage in scaremongering.

        But your argument that Fukushima is a non event, and not dangerous in any way, because the people of Norway are immune to the effects of Chernobyl, isn’t even logical.

      • JackDean says:

        Salmon are bad example. They grow in the open ocean, not the streams of Norway.

        • Kenneth says:

          Yet again, you do this switchback to put words in my mouth. Your original statement, when read in context, is a claim that salmon are a bad example because they are ocean bound and do not travel inland, where the most significant fallout hit Norway – mind you, there was no shortage of radiation that hit the ocean either. Now you turn it around to claim that salmon are being irradiated /because/ they live in the ocean. And in the case of the area near Fukushima, you are quite correct; the fish there is probably not exactly healthy. Which is also why the japanese do not fish there at this time.

          No, Chernobyl did not leak into the seawater. Chernobyl’s initial accident was a steam explosion originating in the core of the reactor itself, which dumped massive amounts of radioactive material into the atmosphere, to the tune of around 85 PBq of Caesium 137. I’ll leave out the other radioactives, since their half-lives are a matter of days, not years. Fukushima’s original accident was not a steam explosion, but venting of hydrogen gas that subsequently caused hydrogen-oxygen exposions. The total radiation leaked from Fukushima during the initial phases of the accident (between 11 March and 5 April) was estimated to 130 PBq for iodine-131 and 11 PBq for caesium-137, which is about 11% of Chernobyl emissions. (http://www.irsn.fr/FR/Actualites_presse/Actualites/Documents/IRSN-NI-Impact_accident_Fukushima_sur_milieu_marin_26102011.pdf)

          The fact of the matter remains that by the time the radioactive water that Fukushima is still leaking into the seawater, radioactivity for said water will be between 10 and 20 bequerels per cubic meter. Well below safe limits. (http://www.nbcnews.com/science/fukushimas-radioactive-ocean-plume-due-reach-us-waters-2014-8C11050755)

          Now, your red herring accusation? This is the second time I have to point out to you that you should desist with the ad hominem attacks if you want to discuss this, I tire quickly of your persistence in this, especially when you can’t even make your mind up about the relevance of salmon or not. It’s apparently highly dependent on whether the arguments around it stack up in your favor or not.

          As for your linked article – I apparently have to quote myself. Again. “. Yes, as I pointed out in the initial post, we had to intervene to ensure we did not eat overly contaminated foodstuffs. For the most part, this was done by giving animals feed designed to reduce radioactive contamination. For some, like the indiginous Sami who primarily eat wild-range game, they had to alter their diet to reduce their exposure. But we certainly did not start /washing our food with soap/ or stop drinking municipal water from ground water sources.”

          I think it’s my turn to point out to the other viewers of this thread that this is information that is readily available on the internet. But you must choose your sources with care. Do not trust data that is not source data, I.e from either credible scientific institutions or monitoring agencies such as NINA or IANA. If you want to know what effects Fukushima will have on your daily life, look into it yourself – but don’t let the scaremongers fool you.

          JackDean, I believe we are done. You may carry on if you please, but I think your credibility on here has gained sufficient holes that people will at least view your statements with some healthy suspicion.

          • JackDean says:

            I never argued that salmon never enter freshwater streams.

            But thank you for saying that I did.

            I argued that the most of their growth occurs in the Atlantic, far from Chernobyl.

            Because they most of their feeding is done outside of the irradiated zones, they won’t be concentrating radiation in their bodies.

            This is why Reindeer are a more appropriate topic. They stay in Norway and feed there.

            So why was there a temporary ban on Reindeer meat and milk after Chernobyl?

          • JackDean says:

            Why not explain why salmon, that spend most of their lives out in the Atlantic, far from Norway are more representative of the safety of Norway food, than livestock and crops that are grown in Norway?

            Were you trying to explain that because Atlantic Salmon are safe, that Pacific Tune that measure high in radioactive cesium are safe too?

            Have you actually been following Fukushima, outside of this article? It appears that this one poorly written and sourced article is your only source of information on Fukushima.

            And you’re wrong, washing vegetables does little good in getting rid of the radiation. The plants take the isotopes up in their roots and leaves. The radioactive isotopes will be distributed all through the fruit.

            Same goes for meats. Cesium builds up in the muscle tissues, and your body is slow to excrete it.

      • JackDean says:

        Thanks for the links. They were informative.

        I don’t know which is true at this point. My government lied for decades about 3 Mile Island, and the truth of that event is only now becoming public in bits and pieces.

        But yes, your argument was that fukushima is all sunshine and unicorns. You were very clear. There was no ambigouity.

        • Kenneth says:

          I’ll restrict myself to one reply rather than three, but I’ll summarize your three posts anyways.

          First of all, I have never said that radiation is harmless, or that the Fukushima accident is. It is /you/ who are claiming that because I encourage realistic views on the situation rather than crisis maximation, I’m somehow saying that it’s inconsequential.
          In my very first post I pointed out the effects that it /did/ have on the Norwegian food chain, and that Norway still has to intervene at times.

          Neither have I said that we are immune to the effects, I am saying that the effects the accident had on Norway were nowhere near what the article claims the effects will be for the US. This is not a logical fallacy on my part, it is a failure on your part to read what I am actually saying, in the context of which it is being said. What logic dictates is that Norway, having experienced a nuclear fallout event that is 7-8 times /worse/ than Fukushima, at a percentage of a distance that the US is from the source, is where you’d want to look for a realistic insight into the effects of such an accident.

          As for the salmon, and them being ‘grown in the open ocean’, please enjoy this video of wild salmon on their yearly run up freshwater streams to their spawning grounds, where they mate and lay their eggs before returning to the ocean. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eR_v26EHIPE
          Salmon farming facilities are also coastal, with the farmed fish being fed caught wild fish such as cod and sea bass. Once again, I’ll direct your attention to the studies I linked in the previous post and the numbers on radiation in the marine environment.

          Salmon is also just one example. Yes, as I pointed out in the initial post, we had to intervene to ensure we did not eat overly contaminated foodstuffs. For the most part, this was done by giving animals feed designed to reduce radioactive contamination. For some, like the indiginous Sami who primarily eat wild-range game, they had to alter their diet to reduce their exposure. But we certainly did not start /washing our food with soap/ or stop drinking municipal water from ground water sources.

          There have been no ad hominem attacks on my part, that’s something you’ve been engaging in. My ‘attacks’ are against your methods of discussion, which include said ad hominem attacks, baseless accusation of shilling, misrepresentation of my statements, and willful misinterpretation. I am pointing out what you are doing wrong that prevents this from being an useful discussion.

          If you want to engage in further debate, show up with links to substantiated, credible sources to back your statements, and stop trying to debate through misrepresentation. If you can’t discuss this without twisting my words, you should probably find something else to spend your time on.

          • JackDean says:

            I’m not still not sure what point your trying to make with Salmon.

            Are you saying that the salmon only eat an grow while in streams and river of Norway.
            Are you saying that Chernobyl spews more than 300 tons of highly radioactive water into the Atlantic Ocean, causing the salmon to take up high levels of radioactive cesium into their muscles, but remain safe to eat?

            Or both, or something else?

            How is Atlantic Salmon anything like the fish that migrate past Fukushima every year?

            I don’t think you mean either, which makes the salmon argument of no consequence. Maybe we should discuss red herring instead?

            Perhaps reindeer is a more appropriate topic?

            http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1946&dat=19860620&id=4hoyAAAAIBAJ&sjid=RagFAAAAIBAJ&pg=5355,5122483

          • JackDean says:

            Have you been following the increasing number of bans on food and fish from the region of Fukushima?

            I have a question, i there are no scientific paper detailing contamination in moose and moss. Why did your government ban the consumption of moose meat and milk for a time? Was the government being unscientific?

    • Gavin Gamache says:

      Ridiculous strawman and ad hominem. “I’m not worried about convincing you,” well, your posts convince me that you don’t know half of what you’re talking about. “Even if I did link the studies,” protip: the fact that you’re NOT linking studies is not something you want to draw attention to. “Google is available to everyone,” and Google is the great democratizer of truth, which is something extremely undemocratic: just because thousands of omni-phobic blog warriors float to the top of a handful of Google searches does not make them an authority. Norwegian Census? Results of nigh-mandatory adult IQ tests? Why do you dismiss these sources so out of hand, and as a counter-offer leave us with only a suggestion to “Google it”?

      And to imply that Kenneth is a shill? Wow, what a novel plan of attack. To be quite honest, it makes more sense mathematically for you to be a shill for someone than it does for Kenneth; just look at who benefits from nuclear scaremongering. JackDean, you could be a shill for iodine supplements, Atlantic fisheries, the insurance industry, or essentially any other energy industry including (drumroll) oil interests. I’m not saying you are, but why should we believe your implication that Kenneth gets a paycheque from posting comments?

  76. Leah says:

    Where are you getting your information from in the IMJ article when you say it “indicates that more than 20,000 deaths right here in North America can be directly attributed to the release of radioactive material from Fukushima”? I don’t see 20,000…I see 14000 estimated and may be as high as 18000. Still a significant number but if you are going to claim you are reporting a truth you should give the public the whole truth.

  77. john doe says:

    Hello WE the USA dropped hardcore nukes in that region less than a century ago! Thanks for catching on… DUH?

  78. JackDean says:

    Kenneth
    Hello, ‘murica? This is Norway calling. We were the country that got the second highest amount of radioactive fallout from the Tchernobyl accident. Radioactive fallout from Fukushima is estimated to be about 17% of Tchernobyl. Guess what? We have ZERO recorded deaths directly linked to the accident. The food chain tainting lead to ten years of feeding wild range animals destined for human consumption with iodine-enriched food before slaughter. We still have to do that ever so often when the mushrooms (Which are the best radioactivity soakers ever) are abundant in autumn. But I would like to remind you all that we are not a radioactive wasteland because of it. And we live on the doorstep of the accident. You have an entire ocean between you and Japan.
    Stop scaremongering and try on some realism. You are not going to drop dead or get cancer from eating or drinking.

    In Norway:
    Stillbirths increased from 4.6% to 8.8%
    Infant mortality rates increased 15.8%
    Norwegians born during the period of the Chernobyl fallout saw a significant drop in IQs when compared to other generations.

    This is easily verified using Google.

    • Kenneth says:

      And could have been much easier to verify if you’d linked your source. But I imagine it’s not a credible one, especially since you’re linking stillbirth stats of 4-8% – the last time Norway had a 4% infant mortality rate was in 1941. Here, let’s go by the norwegian Census then. The year /before/ Tchernobyl, Norway had a brief increase in infant mortaility to 8,5 in 1000. The year after, the year of the accident, the rate dropped back to 7.8. Next year, it increased again to 8.1.
      For the next /twenty years/, the infant mortality rate drops almost every year, until we’re now at 2,5 in 1000.

      As for the IQ testing study you don’t link but refer to, there are numerous problems with that one.

      First of all, that study was torn to very itty bitty little pieces by the rest of the scientific community, because 1) It was not a representative sample. 2) The national draft includes IQ testing, which did not in any way support the report. 3) The radiation levels needed to show any significant change in embryos were far higher (on the scale of hundreds of times) than the radiation they were exposed to. There’s a reason the study is mentioned only a very few times in media – because it’s not a story, it’s just bad science.

    • Czar says:

      For goodness sake, never use Google as a source!

  79. Kenneth says:

    Hello, ‘murica? This is Norway calling. We were the country that got the second highest amount of radioactive fallout from the Tchernobyl accident. Radioactive fallout from Fukushima is estimated to be about 17% of Tchernobyl. Guess what? We have ZERO recorded deaths directly linked to the accident. The food chain tainting lead to ten years of feeding wild range animals destined for human consumption with iodine-enriched food before slaughter. We still have to do that ever so often when the mushrooms (Which are the best radioactivity soakers ever) are abundant in autumn. But I would like to remind you all that we are not a radioactive wasteland because of it. And we live on the doorstep of the accident. You have an entire ocean between you and Japan.

    Stop scaremongering and try on some realism. You are not going to drop dead or get cancer from eating or drinking.

  80. KG says:

    Hi,
    When you say that tap water has not been treated for radiation, I’d like to kindly remind you that ALL water has not been treated for radiation. Bottled water would also be affected, as it comes from the same sources that tap water does. Not only that, bottled water is less regulated for quality in every way than tap water (and routinely shows higher levels of chemicals and bacteria when compared to tap water in third party testing.) The moral of the story is that we have to prevent these accidents upfront because once our ecosystem is tainted, the losses are sometimes insurmountable.

  81. John says:

    Good lord – who the hell writes these articles, and use “Natural News” and “PR Newswire” as sources? Absolutely no credibility in this article whatsoever. The Fukushima crisis is bad, and not getting better, indeed, but not to the extent listed above. But, it’s more fun to spread fear I suppose.

  82. Am I stupid to believe? says:

    Ok ok so you expect me to give a rats ass about radiation? Hello I’m surrounded by it all the time and I don’t give a shizle wether I die in the next 10 yrs cuz who wants to live till 90 anyways..

  83. JackDean says:

    Jacob
    understand that they certainly have a lot of work to do to get their mess cleaned up, both the FDA, EPA, and the CDC are all reporting data thus far that the food supply in our nation is not significantly contaminated, and that there has not been a significant increase in U.S. deaths since the incident.

    Unless you’re exposed to radiation on site, you’re unlikely to see a quick death.
    The Fukushima 50 for instance haven’t all died off yet, though cancer is taking them out pretty quickly.

    Exposure in the USA will lead to cancers and an increase in birth defects. It takes time for this data to gathered and analyzed. It takes time for cesium levels from eating fish, to get to a level that presents immediate dangers.

    In the mean time, Fukushima’s disaster worsens, and the treatments are destabilizing the grounds. As long as TEPCO is in charge of the managing the disaster, and does so on a shoestring budget, the odds of another catastrophic failure continue to increase.

    The advice I have is simply, “Don’t eat seafood.”

    • Richard says:

      So you like making stuff up? One of the Fukushima 50 has died, of cancer, of a cancer that takes 5-10 years to develop if radiation is involved. So, basically, radiation poisoning isn’t taking them out “pretty quickly” at all, a guy died of cancer (guys do it all the time) and died in a timeframe outside of his exposure, and you like to make up facts because you’re unable to take responsibility for your own lack of knowledge?

      Exposure in the US will lead to nothing excessive.

      Do you know how much radiation you’re exposed to from background radiation and radon in the ground? More than you’ll ever see from Fukushima in the US.

      My advice is to go read a book. If you have a degree, consider tearing it up and starting over.

  84. JackDean says:

    Jacob
    So the crap that is being spouted here is supposed to be “true investigative journalism”? This article puts up bogus facts, statistics and quotes them as a reliable source of information. For example, in about 2 minutes I was able to find that the quote from some “expert” stating infant mortality rates in the U.S. have “risen by 35% since the nuclear disaster” is complete garbage. The infant mortality rate from 2010 to 2011 actually DROPPED! Also, if people were just dropping dead in droves like this article is attempting to imply it would be covered by mainstream media. Oh but right it’s all a big conspiracy to keep us all subdued and to continue to laugh and clap our hands at shit shows like Miley Cyrus. Better put my tin foil hat back on, lest I turn into a knuckle dragging ignoramus like the rest of you unenlightened fools!

    Welcome to the Unenlightened Fools Club Jacob!

    Yup, this article is using sensationalism to bring the dangers to light. It is certainly exaggerating them and getting a lot wrong.

    On the other hand, the “All is well, nothing to see here, move along, move along” crowd, are just as wrong, going in the other direction.

    i hope that at least, the folks that find this article will actually do some research and catch up the latest disasters that TEPCO is self reporting.

    • Jacob says:

      understand that they certainly have a lot of work to do to get their mess cleaned up, both the FDA, EPA, and the CDC are all reporting data thus far that the food supply in our nation is not significantly contaminated, and that there has not been a significant increase in U.S. deaths since the incident.

  85. Jacob says:

    So the crap that is being spouted here is supposed to be “true investigative journalism”? This article puts up bogus facts, statistics and quotes them as a reliable source of information. For example, in about 2 minutes I was able to find that the quote from some “expert” stating infant mortality rates in the U.S. have “risen by 35% since the nuclear disaster” is complete garbage. The infant mortality rate from 2010 to 2011 actually DROPPED! Also, if people were just dropping dead in droves like this article is attempting to imply it would be covered by mainstream media. Oh but right it’s all a big conspiracy to keep us all subdued and to continue to laugh and clap our hands at shit shows like Miley Cyrus. Better put my tin foil hat back on, lest I turn into a knuckle dragging ignoramus like the rest of you unenlightened fools!

  86. JackDean says:

    Michael Cooper
    I want people to be informed. Paranoid ignorance is anathema. Articles like this and your blatant misrepresentation of actual contamination levels and the subsequent implications for the ocean are not helpful.

    How about this?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pz1j4IHcsP4

    • close to the edge says:

      Thank you for the RT report. Putting tents over the steam vents? WT? I worked at the construction of a plant in Perry,Ohio and seen almost every area of the plant,from 320′ on the Cooling Tower to 200′ under and into the very Core where the action happens. Amazing to say the least.When i heard that TOPCO was pouring ocean water,e,Salt water onto the reactors i almost shit myself! From the Fuel Pools,the to the inner core, all is made of stainless steel.To remove ice in those areas we used Urea,by the tons,which did no harm to the stainless steel. Salt water eats into the steel and the break-down cannot be stopped.It will burn it’s way from the core into the Drywell,and then the water in the Wetwell goes ‘poof’ into steam. The core fries cuz the Cooling Towers that are unable to cool anymore. There’s a tunnel out into the Lake that is to flood the Reactor is the last fail-safe to cool the Core.That TOPCO move to use saltwater sealed the fate and it’s out of control as it reaches the aquafier and the tanks breakdown,so from the start as they tried to cover it up,we have Wormwood,bitter water,thru-out the foodchain and carried inland,CA,USA,MX by the rains far into the countries.Do what they will,they can’t stop it. But you’ll only hear of it from lame-stream media when it hits them and the Powers that be can’t contain it any longer.Keep getting the message out. This is the greatest threat to life as it spreads unabated. Damnation Alleyway.

      • JackDean says:

        They are making an effort now to drain the aquifer (uphill) that is flowing over the corium.
        As the water flowing into the sea now is heating up the bay, I wonder just how hot the corium will get if they remove this added cooling?

  87. JackDean says:

    Michael Cooper
    I want people to be informed. Paranoid ignorance is anathema. Articles like this and your blatant misrepresentation of actual contamination levels and the subsequent implications for the ocean are not helpful.

    Though this author gets a lot wrong, he sounds like a happy go lucky optimist compered to the reports coming out of TEPCO at this time.

    TEPCO is reporting that all of their waster water tanks are leaking. The water leaking out is so radioactive, that if spend an hour standing near it, you’ll receive the maximum dose of radiation that a nuclear plant worker is allowed, for an entire year. This water is leaking into the soil and the water table. Over 300 tons of highly radioactive water have leaked out the tanks.

    TEPCO has reported that more than 300 tons of highly radioactive water has been flowing into the sea, everyday since the accident occurred.

    TEPCO has also reported that the water tanks they are putting waste water into, are cheaply constructed, and they expect that they may burst soon.

    TEPCO has worked to block the flow of natural streams that run through the cracked core and into the sea. This has caused the water table to rise, and now the worry is that the grounds the reactor buildings rest on will become a soggy radioactive swamp. At that point, the buildings may collapse and workers will not be able to work near the accident any longer.

    Reality is getting far scarier than this misinformed article.

    Here’s a recent article that covers some points…

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-23779561

  88. JackDean says:

    Because the initial hydrogen and nuclear explosions, sent radioactive nucleotides high into the atmosphere.

  89. JackDean says:

    Michael Cooper

    JackDean

    Michael Cooper
    Do you actually know the concentration of cesium coming out of Fukushima and what the dilution factor of the Pacific Ocean is?

    It doesn’t get diluted, so it doesn’t matter what the dilution factor is.
    It’s taken up by plankton very quickly and enters food web.
    Plankton very quickly absorbs any bio-active substances found in the water.

    You’re either being intentionally disingenuous or really don’t understand how basic dispersion works. I can’t tell which.

    Nope I’m talking about the food web. Plankton take up the cesium as it enters the ocean. then larger creatures eat the plankton and it works up the food chain.

    Cesium bi-accumulates. This means that once an organism ingests it, it stays in the organism.

    Dispersion doesn’t apply to substances that are quickly absorbed by the food web. And I understand what dispersion and dilution are. But this only works for non-bioactive materials.

    You should look up the food web, and food chain. This is a topic you should know about. Then you wouldn’t be lost in this conversation.

  90. Michael Cooper says:

    JackDean

    Michael Cooper
    Do you actually know the concentration of cesium coming out of Fukushima and what the dilution factor of the Pacific Ocean is?

    It doesn’t get diluted, so it doesn’t matter what the dilution factor is.
    It’s taken up by plankton very quickly and enters food web.
    Plankton very quickly absorbs any bio-active substances found in the water.

    You’re either being intentionally disingenuous or really don’t understand how basic dispersion works. I can’t tell which.

  91. Michael Cooper says:

    I want people to be informed. Paranoid ignorance is anathema. Articles like this and your blatant misrepresentation of actual contamination levels and the subsequent implications for the ocean are not helpful.

    • Malcolm Douglas says:

      I have a friend who is a marine biologist working in the Marshall Islands for some time now who says the effects on marine life are far worse than anything being reported even in alternative media.

  92. Michael Cooper says:

    We’re talking about Fukushima…shifting the goalpost, eh? How many workers have died or are even expect to die based on their exposure to fission productions from the Fukushima incident?

  93. JackDean says:

    Adam
    Man, I would hate to be Jeromie Williams… but serves him write for writing such an awfully researched article. This is what he says about himself:
    “Jeromie Williams has rock solid experience in the social media world having successfully run high profile Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus, Youtube, Hootsuite, Word Press and numerous other social media accounts for AAA customers, and with his writing and editorial experience, he is one stop media shop.
    As a video game designer, and video game content director, Jeromie Williams has proven himself a highly versatile and insanely creative enigma.”
    AKA: I live with my mom and all my friends are my facebook and twitter followers…

    I hope this isn’t the only article you’ll ever read on Fukushima.

  94. JackDean says:

    Gavin Gamache
    It’s too bad you don’t realize that people EAT bananas, and BREATHE radon gas. Or that the rem (along with the sievert) is a unit of measure which takes into account human biological factors by definition.

    Good, you a little. Let me explain how bio-accumulation works, since is the part you don’t understand.

    The human body needs potassium, our cells have evolved to regulate the quantity of potassium so that it doesn’t reach dangerous levels and kill the cell.

    Cesium is chemically similar to potassium, so our cells have an affinity for it. And it will replace potassium in our cells. But cesium has some differences. It has more 36 more electrons, so it has larger atoms than potassium. This means that it doesn’t fit through the ion channels used to excrete excess potassium.

    So your cells have difficulty getting rid of cesium when the levels get too high. And it prevents potassium from entering your cells.

    Further, cesium, because it has more electrons, it is more chemically reactive that potassium. It produces chemical reaction in your cells that potassium can’t and causes damage that your cells have not evolved for.

    Your heart muscles have a special affinity for cesium. It builds to much higher levels in your heart muscles than any other part of you body. So your heart gets more chemical damage and radiation damage than other parts of your body, if you ingest cesium.

    This is why heart attacks increased dramatically in the region surrounding Chernobyl after the accident.

    The point is, heavier elements like cesium, plutonium, polonium, radium and uranium are quickly taken up in the food web. And you body can’t get rid of them.

    You can get eat excess potassium and you’ll just pee it out. But these other elements keep building up in your body, and are excreted at a dramatically slower rate.

    Look it up. Information on this is freely available on the World Wide Web.

    Don’t eat fish from the Pacific Ocean.

  95. Roberta says:

    Bananas have radiation in them?

  96. JackDean says:

    Michael Cooper
    ” “I’m really smart and trustworthy, so believe me when I say that nuclear power is completely 100% safe, and is super cheap.””
    Strawman, no one makes this claim except people like you using it as a strawman, congrats.

    Still if you want people to believe that nuclear power is cheap, clean and safe, then don’t tell them to research it themselves. That’s just stupid. If you want them to remain ignorant fools, then don’t encourage them to learn about this topic.

  97. JackDean says:

    Michael Cooper
    And their mortality rate is _____________?

    No google where you live?

    The mortality rate from cancer is nearly 100% for the five year period following high exposure at the plant.

    They all die, that’s why they are referred to as disposable. And because they are contractors, they aren’t counted in nuclear statistics. Only full time permanent employees are counted. And this applies int he US also.

    Look it up. The information is hidden on the interwebs…

  98. JackDean says:

    Michael Cooper
    Do you actually know the concentration of cesium coming out of Fukushima and what the dilution factor of the Pacific Ocean is?

    It doesn’t get diluted, so it doesn’t matter what the dilution factor is.

    It’s taken up by plankton very quickly and enters food web.
    Plankton very quickly absorbs any bio-active substances found in the water.

  99. iodine9 says:

    right – and you don’t “eat” radiation, like it is suggested in the article. you can be exposed to radiation produced by materials that are radioactive either by ingesting them or merely being around them (radon gas in a basement for example). and it wouldn’t just be west coast inhabitants of canada and the u.s. who should worry about radiation exposure, if we are talking food, as the san joaquin valley ships all kinds of produce all over north america. just reading those two items were enough to make me question the veracity of the article. having written that, i do not take the fukushima incident lightly. i don’t like that it’s released all kinds of radiation and and radioactive materials and it calls into question the overall continued reliance on an energy source that is so dangerous when it is compromised by human error (3-mile island, chernobyl) or such naturally occurring phenomena as earthquakes…

  100. Bearmeister says:

    Well I guess it’s about time the Japanese got their revenge.

  101. Adam says:

    Man, I would hate to be Jeromie Williams… but serves him write for writing such an awfully researched article. This is what he says about himself:
    “Jeromie Williams has rock solid experience in the social media world having successfully run high profile Twitter, Facebook, Google Plus, Youtube, Hootsuite, Word Press and numerous other social media accounts for AAA customers, and with his writing and editorial experience, he is one stop media shop.
    As a video game designer, and video game content director, Jeromie Williams has proven himself a highly versatile and insanely creative enigma.”
    AKA: I live with my mom and all my friends are my facebook and twitter followers…

  102. Michelle says:

    http://youtu.be/eMmaduq-5bw This video was released right after the tsunami explaining all this. This truth has been known for a while, just hidden from the mass media.

  103. anonymous says:

    This is a map of wave height during the Japanese tsunami, not a map showing radiation levels. There is currently no comprehensive way of testing radiation in the ocean. I would love to see the initial sources this article is based on & not just another link to another article. Thank you.

  104. Jacob says:

    Did anyone actually read the article from “The International Journal of Medicine”? The data is not particularly compelling when you look at the death rates as released by the CDC for 2010 and the preliminary data for 2011. It sounds like the authors of this article have a lot more follow up research to do to truly prove their point. The authors even state that their data may or may not be truly reflective of the nation as a whole, and it requires further follow up to monitor the trending of death rates in the U.S.

    As for the author of this particular article, their sources are not very reliable and lack any professional credibility. Plus they are trying to use a study from 2011 studying the immediate death rates and stating that the limited scope of that study still remains true today. This is awful journalism, firing from the hip as usual, using bogus sources of information, and hoping none of us are smart enough to actually question what they are writing. This article does nothing but play to peoples fear and anxiety related to something they have little understanding about.

    • michael sandford says:

      I’m glad somebody on this website is intelligent enough to see the extreme bias in this article. 20,000 deaths? Let’s do a little bit of thinking here…..A radiation worker in the United States has a Federal dose limit of 5 rem (5000 mrem) per year. If they are exposed to this level of radiation throughout the course of a career, current research suggests that they have a 0.04% greater chance than the average population of dying from radiation-induced cancer.

      Now lets put that in perspective. The radiation level in San Francisco as of 12:45 today was 30 CPM, which translates to roughly 0.025 mrem/hr. At this rate, you would pick up roughly 220 mrem per year of radiation if you lived in this city. Keep in mind that the VAST majority of this background radiation comes from natural sources. At a rate of 220 mrem/year, you would accumulate 22 rem of radiation over a 100 year lifespan.

      So, conclusions…..if 5 rem/year * 35 year career = 175 rem for a lifetime nuclear worker increases the possibility of cancer by 0.04%, then the 22 rem picked up by a 100 year old San Franciscan increases the possibility of cancer by 0.005%. And keep in mind that the average American picks up 600 mrem per year from the sun, bananas, radon, and MANY other sources, natural and man-made.

      The point is, the radiation from Fukushima is very, very small in comparison to everything else in life. Don’t freak out people.

      • michael sandford says:

        I forgot to mention that that “One way trip to colonize Mars” would cost you right around 33,000 mrem to get there from exposure, which is right at 50% more than that poor 100 year old San Franciscan picked up in his lifetime. Sorry for the bad news.

      • JackDean says:

        michael sandford
        I’m glad somebody on this website is intelligent enough to see the extreme bias in this article. 20,000 deaths? Let’s do a little bit of thinking here…..A radiation worker in the United States has a Federal dose limit of 5 rem (5000 mrem) per year. If they are exposed to this level of radiation throughout the course of a career, current research suggests that they have a 0.04% greater chance than the average population of dying from radiation-induced cancer.
        Now lets put that in perspective. The radiation level in San Francisco as of 12:45 today was 30 CPM, which translates to roughly 0.025 mrem/hr. At this rate, you would pick up roughly 220 mrem per year of radiation if you lived in this city. Keep in mind that the VAST majority of this background radiation comes from natural sources. At a rate of 220 mrem/year, you would accumulate 22 rem of radiation over a 100 year lifespan.
        So, conclusions…..if 5 rem/year * 35 year career = 175 rem for a lifetime nuclear worker increases the possibility of cancer by 0.04%, then the 22 rem picked up by a 100 year old San Franciscan increases the possibility of cancer by 0.005%. And keep in mind that the average American picks up 600 mrem per year from the sun, bananas, radon, and MANY other sources, natural and man-made.
        The point is, the radiation from Fukushima is very, very small in comparison to everything else in life. Don’t freak out people.

        It’s too bad that you don’t know the difference between radiation from the bio-accumulation of radio-isotopes, and incidental exposure from external sources.

        If you understood the difference between having cesium accumulate in your heart muscle or in a developing embryo, and radiation you get from being exposed to gamma rays from the sun, then you might have something worth saying.

        Why don’t you do a bit a research on the effects of eating and breathing radioactive isotopes before posting drivel like this?

        • Gavin Gamache says:

          It’s too bad you don’t realize that people EAT bananas, and BREATHE radon gas. Or that the rem (along with the sievert) is a unit of measure which takes into account human biological factors by definition.

        • Michael Cooper says:

          Do you actually know the concentration of cesium coming out of Fukushima and what the dilution factor of the Pacific Ocean is?

  105. Rob says:

    Well, I doubt we are causing the “destruction” of the planet. This planet will endure in some iteration well after we’re gone, and probably better for it. Truth be told, we’re destroying ourselves by poisoning all of those systems by which we survive.

  106. Matt Graves says:

    haha I like how right below the recommended foods is an ad for the bbq pulled pork sandwich from subway.

  107. Bob says:

    google earth is now serving as a geiger counter, cool!

  108. Michael Sandford says:

    This article is funny to me. From reading it I can tell that it was written by someone who is uneducated about nuclear power, radiation and its effects, and the Fukushima accident. Please, anyone who reads this article, do not base your opinions on articles that you read on major news outlets. They generally have very little idea of what’s actually going on and have had a very negative impact on what has historically been a clean, reliable source of power. Do your research folks, and please try to listen to those who actually know what they are talking about.

    • JackDean says:

      Don’t be an silly, if you tell them to research nuclear power they’ll start learning about all of the dirt the media has been sweeping under the rug.

      They’ll learn the truth about Hanford, Three Mile Island, San Onofre, Crystal River, Fort Calhoun, etc….

      If you keep people ignorant, then they’ll think that nuclear power is safe and clean. If you encourage them to do research, they’ll find out it’s filthy, dangerous, expensive and subsidized heavily with our tax dollars.

      So don’t say, do the research, say, “I’m really smart and trustworthy, so believe me when I say that nuclear power is completely 100% safe, and is super cheap.”

      • Michael Cooper says:

        ” “I’m really smart and trustworthy, so believe me when I say that nuclear power is completely 100% safe, and is super cheap.””

        Strawman, no one makes this claim except people like you using it as a strawman, congrats.

  109. Brian says:

    The only way to avoid radiation through water is distilled water. Regular filtration absolutely does not rid of radioactive material.

    • JackDean says:

      Brian
      The only way to avoid radiation through water is distilled water. Regular filtration absolutely does not rid of radioactive material.

      That’s doesn’t get rid of tritium….

  110. mai says:

    i dont get it though… who died?

  111. rushcranker says:

    Colonize Mars ? just where do you expect to get you’re Food & WATER FROM ????

  112. jennifer says:

    Oh ok.. bc ( the way you make it sound) Its Japan’s fault that they had the earthquake. I lived in Okinawa, Japan for the last two years and Im fine. ACTUALLY Japanese people are probably some of the healthiest people you will ever meet, They typically live into the 100’s. Thats actual fact.. google it. You should have ALWAYS been washing your fruits and veggies. You should ALWAYS know where your seafood comes from and OH YOU GUESSED IT.. you should be using filtered water. How is this a knowledge bomb? NO, this is just (bc I like the terminology) American Paranoia. Im sure if you actually did research of the cases of allllllll of those babies that were born with Thyroid problems, a very, very SMALL number of them were actually related to over exposure to radiation. I bet of all of those birth defects NONE of them had any thing to do with the parents life style choices or hereditary genes. ( Im being sarcastic of course.. but just in case some one couldnt pick that up.. ill clarify) ALSO since the number of people on this planet is literally increasing in droves yes birth defects will increase.. so nice try. The media has been using that ” statistic” tactic since
    ‘Nam. Overall , this is not a ” crisis” this is just an attempt to freak people out for no reason. If you choose to fall for it.. shame on you.

    • JackDean says:

      Jennifer, are you arguing that if the Fukushima accident is to have an effect on the lifespan of the Japanese then we should’ve seen the effect hundreds of years ago? Do you believe that the future changes the past?

      Washing vegetables won’t help.. Strontium, cesium and tritium are taken up into the cells. You can’t wash it out.

      Most water filters, can’t filter them out either. No water filter you can afford, can can filter out tritium.

      You don’t where your fish comes from. In Japan, dolphin meat is intentionally mislabeled as whale meat to trick you. Other kinds of fish is often labelled as tuna to intentionally deceive you. So if you can’t trust labels, then how do you know where your fish comes from? You don’t.

      Maybe you should direct your ire at TEPCO for trying to freak people out for no reason, with their announcements that they’ve leaking over 300 tons of radioactive water into the sea since the disaster happened.

      “I bet of all of those birth defects NONE of them…” – How good of a gambler are you? Have you retired on your winnings?

    • JackDean says:

      You might be right. Maybe the Japanese didn’t know that the islands have volcanoes and that earthquakes, tsunamis etc… are common there?

      Or that these things can damage buildings.

      And being ignorant of these things, there was no reason to think that placing nuclear reactors all around the island is a bad idea.

  113. ladylei2005 says:

    When will people realize every cause has an affect and we are causing destruction of this planet.

  114. ladylei2005 says:

    I had no idea people could be so misinformed. Radiation travels especially if it’s being dumped in the ocean at 3000 tons per day

  115. Nicole says:

    This is not to be taken lighty. The govenment will not share the truth to prevent widespread panic. You can also google cesium contamination and read up on the facts if you think this is a hoax. As for me and my family we have been preparing and will continue to prepare until there are no more supplies that are safe to consume.

  116. JackDean says:

    Justin
    Ok, that map only shows seawater impacts (if correct). I am a meteorologist…if you live in the USA, guaranteed the moisture that produced your precipitation is very local and did not come from Hawaii (who was the last person you knew that died from acid rain?) That takes care of problems #2 through 5……#1 might be an issue if your fish was from west of hawaii (which is very unlikely). People have no intuition anymore…

    Fish follow migratory patterns.

    Tuna swim in a big circle form the California, to Mexico, to Japan, up toward Alaska, and back to California again.

    Salmon spend years roaming the Pacific before returning back to the rivers that spawned them, so they can be cut up and served in restaurants.

    I’m not sure if I should value intuition over knowledge. In fact I’m certain I shouldn’t.

  117. JackDean says:

    will
    Ok if all of this is true would it not have been on the news a long time ago?

    Why would it be on the news?
    News programming is designed to entertain you, not inform you.

    • Jacob says:

      So the crap that is being spouted here is supposed to be “true investigative journalism”? This article puts up bogus facts, statistics and quotes them as a reliable source of information. For example, in about 2 minutes I was able to find that the quote from some “expert” stating infant mortality rates in the U.S. have “risen by 35% since the nuclear disaster” is complete garbage. The infant mortality rate from 2010 to 2011 actually DROPPED! Also, if people were just dropping dead in droves like this article is attempting to imply it would be covered by mainstream media. Oh but right it’s all a big conspiracy to keep us all subdued and to continue to laugh and clap our hands at shit shows like Miley Cyrus. Better put my tin foil hat back on, lest I turn into a knuckle dragging ignoramus like the rest of you unenlightened fools!

  118. JackDean says:

    Dilution isn’t the factor that matters.

    Plankton take up the isotopes soon after the water enters the sea.
    Then krill feed on the plankton, fish feed on the krill, largest fish feed on these fish and finally we get radioactive tuna and salmon.

    Folks keep talking about dilution, as though the sea is a lifeless dead void…

  119. JackDean says:

    Kevin
    Radiation is nothing new. Radioactive isotopes are created naturally everyday as we speak (Radon gas, and gamma rays are the most common). Nuclear sub use reactors and dump waste into the ocean everyday only in a quantity so weak that it does not affect the food chain. It really depends on how dilute the radiation is before it can be labeled a threat.

  120. Justin says:

    Ok, that map only shows seawater impacts (if correct). I am a meteorologist…if you live in the USA, guaranteed the moisture that produced your precipitation is very local and did not come from Hawaii (who was the last person you knew that died from acid rain?) That takes care of problems #2 through 5……#1 might be an issue if your fish was from west of hawaii (which is very unlikely). People have no intuition anymore…

    • Arnold says:

      Radiation is not only transmitted through water vapour, which in turn becomes rain. Radiation can be radiated into the air from the sea. In other words, it is even worse than acid rain. More importantly, the picture was taken 1 year ago. The water probably has already flowed to the west coast by now. Unlike 50 years ago, sea products are not sold at one geographical region now. Americans can import mangos from Thailand, pineapples from Vietnam, seaweed from Japan. Asian countries can import Boston lobsters and Alaska king crabs.
      Given the above, no one can evade from this kind of contamination. Anyway, the message of this article is to let everyone aware that the Japanese government is still letting their radioactive water leaking into the Pacific Ocean everyday. We need to urge the Japanese government to fix the problem regardless of the cost.

  121. derick says:

    typical americans and power nations, as always and never looking at the fact they themselves allow more disgusting chemicals in their food and drinking water then anywhere else in the world.
    lets all jump the band wagon and stop eating and drinking the all of the above because now all of sudden its been irradiated , the other day i bought dried apricots the list of ingredients was as long as my pinky finger for something that was “Organic ” BS.
    its sad to think that somebody has read this article and no doubt will be freaking out and taking the “Precautions” instead of just living plain old living and enjoying life .

  122. bird says:

    All I got to say is you can’t clean radioactive things it becaume part of the atomic structure you’d need yo basicly wait for all the material to finish decaying and since tomatoes and milk have a shelf life of a week or so it won’t even come close to our minimum 30k year wait and with winds coming from the west going to the east 75 percent of the time even growing your own anything will leave you unhealthy.

  123. Kevin says:

    Radiation is nothing new. Radioactive isotopes are created naturally everyday as we speak (Radon gas, and gamma rays are the most common). Nuclear sub use reactors and dump waste into the ocean everyday only in a quantity so weak that it does not affect the food chain. It really depends on how dilute the radiation is before it can be labeled a threat.

  124. todd says:

    sounds like paranoia to me. puffing on one cigarette would be more than the “amount” of radiation poised as being hazardous

  125. Sam says:

    the comments below give me hope that not everyone is an idiot and some people take the time to find out the truth for themselves.

  126. will says:

    Ok if all of this is true would it not have been on the news a long time ago?

  127. rob says:

    the very air we breathe is killing us, and has for many years.

  128. ryan says:

    so.. i can’t drink water, eat meat, dairy or fruits or vegetables? awesome. lol.

  129. Aaron says:

    Old news… If you want to freak out then a bit late..

  130. Daniel says:

    Interesting article but I don’t believe in permanent radiation. This and be removed by natural convention

  131. Robert Ross says:

    From http://www.asrltd.com/japan/plume.php the original producers of the map:

    “We use a Lagrangian particles dispersal method to track where free floating material (fish larvae, algae, phytoplankton, zooplankton…) present in the sea water near the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station plant could have gone since the earthquake on March 11th. THIS IS NOT A REPRESENTATION OF THE RADIOACTIVE PLUME CONCENTRATION. Since we do not know exactly how much contaminated water and at what concentration was released into the ocean, it is impossible to estimate the extent and dilution of the plume. However, field monitoring by TEPCO showed concentration of radioactive Iodine and Cesium higher than the legal limit during the next two months following the event (with a peak at more than 100 Bq/cm3 early April 2011 for I-131 as shown by the following picture).”

  132. Sean Cahill says:

    I guess we are even after Hiroshima then.

    • TWK says:

      You poor dumb. Hiroshima was us getting even for Pearl Harbor and done to save a few hundred thousand GI lives.

      • Chad says:

        Actually, if you researched history or look beyond what a highschool textbook tells you, That’s not 100% true. Japan attacked Pearl Harbor because Pearl harbor’s entire purpose was to be a military base to send an attack fleet to Japan, Why else would America annex a Hawaiian island and put a base there? It was a pre-emptive strike to prevent a war that Japan could not win, we all saw that they failed, and Japan was completely destroyed by a fleet of air bombers. The entire air-force and navy was wiped out, and Japan was mostly destroyed and defenseless. The entire purpose of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was to test out bombs that America spent countless hours and dollars investing in, so they didn’t want the bombs to go to waste. They did it to scare Russia and prevent them from attacking America, and that was the primary goal.

      • Mike says:

        “You poor dumb” What a gloriously illiterate sentence,lol.And to wit,Pearl Harbour was a military operation,dropping 2 nuclear bombs on a civilian population is a war crime you glorious American tool

  133. Phil says:

    The funny thing about this photo is that the “Red” area is not even where the power plant was. I was just over in that area of Japan recently. Tokyo (The area by the red) was not the source of the power plant melt down. this is not a real photo.

  134. Meh says:

    Meh, this sounds like a whole lot of hoopla about nothing. Someone trying to work against Californian agriculture. Hawaii, Oregon, Washington, and Baja California (which does export to the U.S.) aren’t anywhere to be seen on the list of things to watch out for.

    Surely California can’t be the only place outside of Japan with irradiated local foods.

  135. Sam Noble says:

    I was very interested in your article, until I read about one paragraph and sensed a terrible level of unprofessional sarcasm, and a hideous combination of, let’s say, finger pointing statements.
    I’m no news paper editor, but I am interested in what’s going on in the world, I am a west coast resident, but you’re article that seems so very important, lost my interest within less than 100 words.
    Like an old TLC song, brush yourself off and try again. And in my words, because this one sucks.

  136. Peace says:

    Typical paranoid America. I was in Sendai when the earthquake happened and guess what, I’m still here.
    People are testing the levels of radiation all the time just for precaution but there is no rising level of concern.
    I’ve felt many earthquakes before and this one was real, my apartment was ruined and I had to move. Sendai is back to normal, the Japanese did a great job of repairing the city.
    How many nuclear bombs have been tested in the west coast? Of course there is a spike there.

  137. AmandaS says:

    Cancer and most other radiation induced long term effects dont show up for several years so the fact that increases of such apparent sizes are being ‘detected’ is absolute BS

    That map of radiation from Japan is probably a snap shot just at/after the event and doesnt show how quickly the levels drop and disperse, there is no colour scale, and other parts of the map also seem to be highly radioactive which dont correspond to the spill

    the west coast was picking up higher levels of radiation but even if they were of this magnitude it was only for a very short time – i think the magnitude is also a few factors out though too.

    No one working at the actual plant or cleaning up afterwards was killed in this incident so I would like to know how people thousands of miles away are being killed!

  138. Sean says:

    All thats missing in this article is letting me know where I can set my alien traps and the lochness monster location . That sucker swallowed my GPS last time I ran into it but I guess it doesnt carry that far out into the water .

  139. Dawn says:

    You can’t live that way. Well, maybe you can, but I can’t. I can’t walk around acting there’s poison everywhere. Even though there is, I can’t wash all my food with filtered water. I mean come on! Not only would that be so fruitless, but it would be such a waste, for little pay off. What I will do though is stock up on atlantic sea kelp supplements and give them to my kids and call that that. If we have enough iodine in us, there’s no way for the radioactive kind to build up. Then, actively work to change the world’s idea of nuclear energy. Earth is my home, I won’t be afraid of her plants or her water that come from my yard. If our entire country is essentially poisoned with radiation, so be it. Let’s start growing more marijuana more healing plants of all kinds, each of us, so we can combat any cancers that may arise, I guess. But live in the kind of fear you are projecting? That’s not living at all. If I were to live that way, I might as well already be dead.

    • anon says:

      I hate to say it, thats a good attitude, but I have a feeling the earth as a whole will be very very different in the coming years. Our governments are pretty much playing god, and I think every little thing in the world will be controlled and manipulated at some point of time. perhaps even down to our air. maybe we won’t know it for awhile either. Just saying, you never know..

    • John Cook says:

      I Totally agree. But I don’t think you should feel “guilty” about it. In fact “walking around acting like….” is almost guaranteed to give you cancer!
      Cancer is caused mostly by low immune/spirit levels plus negative imagination plus a carcinogen to localise the manifestation.
      Radioactivity will provide that local carcinogen either as a (hot) particle in the gut or lungs or as a (hot) mineral being absorbed to an organ or gland or other site in your body that happens to be lacking that mineral.
      Eating those high mineral sea foods (from pure seas) will stop your body absorbing any radioactive minerals that may be (or suddenly arrive) in your environment because you will already have more than enough.
      There is a list of foods/herbs/other things (like sea salt) that should be taken every day. Collect a list that works for you.
      And never forget – If you go to another level, spirit will overcome amazing physical problems…

    • Carly says:

      Really like what you said and have thought those exact things. Eat atlantic kelp, grow and smoke maryjane. Everything will be okay if you decide that it will 🙂

  140. Amy says:

    How frustrating. The seawater impact map doesn’t even show a scale relating the map colors to radiation levels. C’mon now, you could have at least pretended to try.

  141. anon says:

    can’t tell if trolling or severely misinformed

  142. Oastica says:

    Zorra/Father God said radiation has been neutralized in an instant!! This is a fear tactic being implanted in people so they give up their properties to the corporations so the would build other facilities. Fear is the Destroyer! Replace fear with Love! Listen @ 2:16:50 http://www.blogtalkradio.com/hollowearthnetwork/2013/08/10/hollow-earth-network

  143. Bacock Ofroma says:

    What a bunch of lies lies lies..

    • JackDean says:

      Because the initial hydrogen and nuclear explosions, sent radioactive nucleotides high into the atmosphere.

  144. Brian says:

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but the water itself is not radioactive, what is dissolved in it is (assumedly Uranium, Plutonium, etc). Heavy metals don’t go with the water when it evaporates, and farmers don’t water their crops with sea water, so I don’t see how Fukushima could be affecting our water supply. There are other sources of radioactivity in water, depending on where it’s pulled from. Burning dirty coal in China might be releasing stuff into the air that gets in our rain water. The wells that are used for irrigation could be drawing in ground water that is carrying radioactive isotopes from other sources. Besides sea life from the Pacific Ocean, I really question the logic that our food has been tainted by Fukushima.

    • JackDean says:

      Because the initial hydrogen and nuclear explosions, sent radioactive nucleotides high into the atmosphere.

  145. Ricky Ricardo says:

    “This isn’t a conspiracy theory, this is happening and it’s happening right now.”

    There are so many grammatical errors in the above quote that the article loses all credibility to me.

  146. Andy says:

    This author is fear-mongering and cherry picking statistics from over 2 years ago. Check out the article it links to, it’s from April 2011…. and even that article takes it’s stats from a Forbes magazine article which mentions: “Iodine-131 has a half life of eight days: every eight days, half of its mass decays into a non-radioactive isotope of xenon.”

    So basically any and all of this didn’t effect people and stopped over two years ago however “pakalertprees.com” suddenly decided write this gem of a news article. Thanks Jeromie, keep up the good work.

    • JackDean says:

      Check out the recent press releases from TEPCO.

      They have announced that at least 300 tons of highly radioactive water has been released into the ocean, every day since the disaster began. So it didn’t end two years ago. It’s ongoing.

      This information is everywhere now. I don;t understand why anyone interested in nuclear energy wouldn’t know about it. You’re lagging far behind the rest of us.

  147. Jay says:

    HotinSC
    I always enjoy people who make some Fox News comment at every opportunity. It would be interesting if you were able to provide any facts to back up your inference that Fox does not report true news. Give specifics to validate your point..or just make subjective statements based on lack of knowledge, ideology that is stuck in concrete and will never budge, or just plain ignorance. When I read an article like this, I do independent research to determine if none, some or all is truth or factual. Do the same about reports on Fox News and THEN make the inference above. At least that would give you credibility.

    Anyone who says that Fox News doesn’t lie does not deserve credibility. It’s a easy google search away.

  148. Bryon says:

    Ok so… how does washing your food with soap and or filtering your water get rid of radiation exactly? I don’t think radioactivity is something a Brita filter or some Palmolive can remove…

    • Brad Doty says:

      I was reading up on it at the time Fukushima happened. Radiation is hosted in tiny particles of dust, or meat and plants. It’s actually pretty easy to get rid of by just washing off, UNTIL you ingest it through your lungs or stomach. Then it’s in you forever, slowly giving you cancer if it’s weak enough to not give you radiation sickness.

    • Meghan says:

      I work for a water filtration company and their are Radon systems our there that are quite costly

  149. Dev says:

    WOW. And I thought people couldn’t get stupider!

  150. Elise says:

    Since when does my Brita filter have a radiation removal element?

  151. steve says:

    Um thats a google earth map which someone drew on. Also is the radiation in the ocean, it wouldnt take that long to get here. If its floating then it would of been here in a couple of weeks tops. If its not floating it wouldnt get here at all.

  152. Tom says:

    Bull S—

  153. Really says:

    Seriously? This article makes Fox News look like the pinnacle of journalism.

    • HotinSC says:

      I always enjoy people who make some Fox News comment at every opportunity. It would be interesting if you were able to provide any facts to back up your inference that Fox does not report true news. Give specifics to validate your point..or just make subjective statements based on lack of knowledge, ideology that is stuck in concrete and will never budge, or just plain ignorance. When I read an article like this, I do independent research to determine if none, some or all is truth or factual. Do the same about reports on Fox News and THEN make the inference above. At least that would give you credibility.

      • Emilio Dumphque says:

        How about when they reported that Morgan Freeman was dead two years ago? He’s still alive and kickin’.

      • Brian says:

        The constant denial of climate change would be one reason to discredit Fox News. Also, how about all the studies that show Fox News viewers are more likely to be misinformed than viewers of any other new network… even less informed than people who don’t watch the news.

  154. I’m gonna call B.S.

  155. jessica says:

    Did anyone stop to think this was posted as a cover-up for something else that may actually be going on? Just saying it is something to think about with how controlled the media is these days.

    • Freken says:

      Probably another oil spill in the Atlantic so this takes your attention away from that body of water for the time being. I would be still more worried about the oil spill results from several years ago than a radiation leak in Japan. I’m sure there are enough world monitors watching that area very closely so it doesn’t get out of hand.

    • CM says:

      you know you have a problem with paranoia when you read an article about a cover up and you think
      hey, maybe this cover up is hiding another cover up

      when did everyone lose their minds? why was i not invited?

    • James eh says:

      Conspiracy Theory is a tool of the Government created to control by false fear and helplessness. This website is a Puppet.

  156. brad says:

    when the headline stories on the website are “New world order”, “Illuminati”, “World War 3”, and “Survivalism”…..ill take the article with a grain of salt.

  157. Sophia says:

    What a horribly written “article”….if it can even be called that.

  158. tabarus says:

    Where is the white brotherhood?
    white dragon society ?
    Keshe ?
    act NOW!
    stop nuclear power now !

  159. FOX says:

    Someone should kick ass those guys who are plaing to build new Atombombs, umm Atomreactors

  160. Natalie says:

    Yes, this has always been a bad situation since it’s happened back in 2011. And, many people will die of cancer if they don’t smarten up , and start taking care of themselves. People who eat a shitty diet, giving their body toxicity on a regular basis will soon see the effects of their choices, it’s sad but true. Radiation can be removed from your body, by detox. There are many different ways, fruits and vegetables (which are naturally detoxifying to the body) even bentonite clay which actually removes the chemicals and safely flushes it out of your body .But, when your given a dose of it daily and decide to ignore it, it will eventually cause disease.

  161. Jason Sweet says:

    They are scientists and chemists who know how to neutralize the radiation. They can make it all harmless with a simple chemical reaction. They’re not this stupid unless it is their intention.

  162. Inkya says:

    I knew this was full of BS. worltruth #notasource

  163. Scott says:

    “Almost past Hawaii”. That’s good journalism there. How about “Nearing Hawaii”, “Closing in on Hawaii”, “Moving towards the States”? But “Almost past”??? Really??

  164. Michael Manning says:

    “We use a Lagrangian particles dispersal method to track where free floating material (fish larvae, algae, phytoplankton, zooplankton…) present in the sea water near the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station plant could have gone since the earthquake on March 11th. THIS IS NOT A REPRESENTATION OF THE RADIOACTIVE PLUME CONCENTRATION.” That’s why the media isn’t covering it, because it isn’t a radiation map at all. Calm down everyone.

  165. joe says:

    Because radiation doesn’t work that way?

  166. Nemo_from_Erehwon says:

    Not just total bullshit, but irresponsible total bullshit. Shame.

  167. Keith Patton says:

    As a kid in 1960, we couldn’t make snow cream anymore due to radiation levels in the snow in Maine due to the atmospheric nuke tests in China. Tell us what the rad levels the colors in the picture represent. The trouble with alarmist crap like this article is it attributes other publications but there are no hard scientific data cited from authoritative sources. People publish lies and crap all the time, repeating it does not make it true. I don’t drink much milk so I don’t care about that, but I do care about false claims and bogus science.

  168. Jane says:

    Yes, please do let us know where we can purchase these special filters. Our lives depend on it!

  169. bilbo baggins says:

    freakin chinks

  170. Elizabeth says:

    This is erroneous. I live on one of the small coastal islands off of Japan and we are all absolutely fine here. If the leakage was killing people 7,000 miles away, us over here a couple hundred miles away would be decimated. We’re not, so stop spreading your misinformation. Yes it’s leaking, but it’s not killing people like everyone in North America wants to tell people. USA is such a drama queen, it’s embarrassing to the fellow American population. It’s not all about us, you know. Get your facts straight.

  171. a says:

    Basically, any study that cites Sherman or Mangano should be ignored.

  172. shyrabbit says:

    “Infant mortality rate up 35%”…Simply not true. Please quote a reliable source please…

  173. cool says:

    I think u should all just kill yourselfs now before it gets worse. Just step in front of my car or drink that shitty water

  174. danijacks says:

    I think its actually hilarious that my dear country america is scapegoating all of the rise of radiation levels in milk on japan’s nuclear power plant and other natural disasters…nuclear radiation is not news…we have several, not to mention old dump sites (in the us) spewing radiation…oh and I forgot about those old nuclear weapons tests we used to do around the 50’s. Point is this is not news and majority of the radiation spikes is due to our own mistakes and this article is not informative to making its audience aware of the universal harms of radiation which comes in many forms….

  175. trav says:

    Wait.. what kind of water filter can filter out the radiation XD

    • ralph martin says:

      trav
      Wait.. what kind of water filter can filter out the radiation XD

      LOL EXACTLY!!! Conspiracy theorists rarely think things all the way through.

  176. Mike says:

    Guess its time to incinerate those and move east..

    • Rich says:

      It’s mostly conspiracy theorist nonsense again. The only articles they quote and link directly to are mostly other conspiracy nut sites like Worldtruthtv and Natural News (known to many as the ‘Fox News of health’ websites which distorts, misrepresents, and downright twists health experts’ comments and news articles into actual lies that they pretend to be quoting from ie) chemotherapy [which is now 85 to 90% effective depending on which cancer it is targeting, and claims that cures cancer]). Any of the mainstream organizations or news sources are linked to but not the articles they are claiming to be sourcing (such as the FDA raising acceptable levels of radiation instead of banning food with those levels) from. A New York Times ‘article’ is referenced but the link leads to Enenews.com instead of the NY Times.

      • Darren says:

        I would be interested to know why you think that massive, widespread radioactive contamination, persisting and travelling through the food chain of plant and animal life, after perhaps the greatest peacetime nuclear disaster ever, wouldn’t be entirely logical.

        • Mark Neil says:

          Because there is nothing in the article or links that demonstrate that this is a result of the Japan earthquake. I see no reports of the levels of radiation prior to that quake, not correlation to the quake or reactor leak in any way.

          You also seem to re-spin Rich’s arguments, ignoring many in order to push an emotional argument. For example… You ignore his point about failure to link legitimate sources he sites, while only providing links to known sensationalist sites (that in turn, fail to provide any evidence of the claim this is a result of the quake).

        • Mike says:

          Because radiation is all around us, constantly. What is important is the levels of radiation — and more than that, a meaningful measurement (like Sieverts, as opposed to Rads). How many Sv per square meter of water? Give us specific numbers, not “twenty times EPA maximums.” See also: http://imgs.xkcd.com/blag/radiation.png

      • Darren says:

        Additionally: Do you think there might be a reason you wouldn’t read this in the New York Times?

      • Jen says:

        Ummm…what are you talking about chemo is 85-90% effective? At what? Killing the person? The mortality rates for people taking chemo is such that they consider “cured” to be living past 5 years. Ummm…you should do a bit more research sir…

      • Steve says:

        Oh I’d LOVE to see a list of which cancers chemo is 85~90% effective against curing, take your time.

      • Martin Ortbauer says:

        Hey, sure the article does not provide any reliable source, but i was researching a bit and found a site which links lot’s of different articles “http://www.vesica.org/emf-nuclear/articles/32-emf-nuclear-protection/emf-nuclear-protection-articles/77-radiation-update”, which also led me to an article about Idoine in milk which has good sources, see yourself “http://www.naturalnews.com/032048_radiation_milk.html”

  177. Taffy says:

    You obviously have no idea of how radiation works, how to interperate these graphs, or what acceptable level means. You’re causing hysteria because you don’t understand. Education fail…

  178. LANI says:

    I’m a scientist too. There are 2 sides- 1-its not harmful, 2- it’s harmful.
    So which side do we choose?
    I would believe both. So be careful, and yes, statistics show that babies in Hawaii have an increase in hypothyroidism. We can only guess why since we don’t have hard scientific facts, at least not yet. Only time and research studies will give us the information we need, however, we don’t have time. Because if the data that has been presented to us is true, then YES, we are being affected NOW, this is not enough time for scientists to prove the theory true or false.
    As for me, I don’t eat fish, because that has been proven!! Fish have been caught with higher levels of radiation!! The irony is, that it’s not being publicized, and it’s not a red flag!!
    What can we do? Nothing much, it’s in god’s hands now.

    • Ashley Jakes says:

      a scientist leaving the fate of our health and the health of our environment in the hands of God? Interesting.

    • kuni says:

      yes, Lani it is up to God, what can u do? u said. But you’ve done a lot in my opinion. by sharing your knowledge. i didn’t know that about fish.
      when i was little my little league coach told me take pride in the way you look looking good is half the battle( to winning the game I suppose). looking good, well makes you feel better,feeling good makes u play better n so on. . . . So knowledge is half the battle to making a change. This must be true statement. or knowledge would not be power. And the media would be reporting it but they are not sharing there knowledge. And the gov’t are prosecuting whistleblowers as spies.

    • RAllan says:

      In God’s hands now?! You idiot.

      • Aly says:

        You only look insecure for calling a stranger an idiot. It’s a sign of weakness to carelessly attack someone… True strength is being able to accept another’s opinion without feeling threatened by it.

  179. livex says:

    There might well be cause for concern here but this:

    “you are eating radiation and feeding it to your children. Slowly the radiation levels within your body will build up. This is PERMANENT.”

    — is idiotic, scientifically illiterate crap. So is the idea that washing your food, with or without soap, would have any effect. We’re not talking about pesticides here.

  180. David McFarland says:

    I’ve worked in nuclear power (Health Physics/ Radiation Protection) for 30 years. We NEVER detected any Iodine in the USA from Fukushima! Even if we had, it would be COMPLETELY GONE after 40 days. How in hell can our milk be contaminated 2-1/2 years later? Where is the fresh source of the Iodine? Also, VERY NICE map! Did you photoshop that off of Google Earth? First off, the technology does not exist to detect radiation from outer space. You would need to directly sample and analyze every single data point on that map in order for it to be accurate, and that hasn’t been done comprehensively. Second, and of particular interest, the Kuroshio current flows NORTH from Japan up to the Kamchatka Peninsula, then to Alaska, then to California. In order to achieve the plume that you have (falsely) depicted, it would have to flow south, and I don’t think that a nuclear accident of ANY magnitude could accomplish THAT- pretty amazing! Your sources are not credible. Did you make up their names, or are they just ‘nobodys’? The EPA and FDA authorizing ACL’s (alternative contamination limits)? Not to my knowledge, and I’m not buying that one without a credible reference! Also… some isotopes do remain active for 30,000 years (Uranium’s half life is 4+ BILLION), but for that EXACT reason, they would not be harmful to you- SHORT half lives are dangerous because all of their energy is released in a short period of time. Nice try, but this article is precisely what you proclaim it is not… a completely unfounded conspiracy theory.

    • Haron says:

      Good job squashing this B.S.

    • Chris says:

      Clap…clap….clap…clap!

    • a says:

      Good reply!

    • Joe says:

      Well, you almost sounded like you knew what you were talking about. Look a little closer, the ocean currents are flowing NORTH, not south like you say they would have to.
      You’re also wrong about being able to detect radiation from space. Look up the ASTRO-H satellite (also known as NEXT or New X-ray Telescope).
      I agree the article seems very extremist, but you credibility has also been lost.

      • Cam says:

        Um…. look again. The “Google Earth” logo is in the lower right corner of the image that depicts the radiation. Is Google Earth offering a “Radiation View” mode now? In which case, can I see the travel times of the radiation, both with traffic and without?

      • Brad Doty says:

        Joe, you don’t sound like you know what you’re talking about. The Japan Current, I learned in about 5th grade, flows north on the western edge of the Pacific, up from the equator past Japan and up toward Siberia and the Bering Sea. By then it’s flowing east to Alaska and down the Canadian coast and continues south past the US and Mexico. You know – roughly a semi-circle?

  181. Jamie says:

    Well I know what I am going to do… Start a Radiation Filter company In Calf. for your home water Consumption. LOL

  182. Carl Sagan says:

    “that one way trip to colonize Mars is looking pretty damn attractive”

    Just wait until they find out how much radiation they’ll be soaking up outside of the atmosphere…

  183. Austin McCree says:

    You’re using a study that is two years old and has already been debunked almost as soon as it came out. I don’t understand how you could even gather the words to write this article without first finding out that the study was complete bullshit. I am concerned about negative environmental side effects the way you are, but you are either a complete dumbass, or you are just write anything that gets clicks and ad money.

    http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2011/12/20/researchers-trumpet-another-flawed-fukushima-death-study/

  184. Franz says:

    It is easy to read, but not to read stuff that is properly cited, peer reviewed and well cited. Sorry, but your excuse (and this article) doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.

  185. Komotz says:

    “Do not drink any water that has not been filtered”

    Wow, this guy actually thinks that filters can get rid of radiation.

  186. viateur levesque says:

    We must rid ourselves of all the governments that will lead us to a total destruction of our planet, we can manage ourselves and we replace these shitty by the new system:. Paradism org

    • Brad Doty says:

      Really? Just think how long you’d last in a world of chaos without governments. Ever watched Mad Max or just about any apocalyptic sci-fi show?

  187. Jo Cabo says:

    The image used with this story is somewhat mis-leading, I know because I helped set up the computer simulation from which that graphic was produced. That plot was just as a demonstration of a dispersion model that we were testing with another model that simulates ocean surface currents (HYCOM). To produce this output, we assumed a constant flow of water at the location of Fukushima and let ti run at a constant flow rate (can’t remember exactly what) for a full year. I’m not saying that Fukushima didn’t do anything, or that it’s not releasing radiation, just saying that this graphic is not really what happened in the ocean. or any sort of assessment of the levels of radiation in the ocean. Really, the bigger issue is the airborne transport of radioactive material, not the water transport.

  188. Critters says:

    This is retarded. Fucking idiotic. Japan would be reporting it you dumb shits.

    • Darren says:

      Would they be?

    • Lubens Besse says:

      Why would Japan report this? to create widespread fear and bring attention to a virtually unstoppable pandemic? Or to draw criticism of is dangerous and unpopular nuclear power program which caused it in the first place. And how long have YOU been reading Japanese environmental reports? Wake up, buddy! If someone is watchful enough to give you information that may save you… I would at least consider using it.

      Whoever said every article on this looks flakey… Were you expecting some sort of Pulitzer level body of work? If you haven’t noticed, the news is all mass-marketed crap designed to keep you suspended in a bubble of terror alerts, diets, and consumerism. Any non-scientist who has a strong opinion about this is about as useful to us as tits on a bull. That is all

      Wu-Tang Clan says “Protect ya Neck!”

  189. Christopher S. Johnson says:

    Wow, every link I track dow in this article is flaky. This is not a legit story. There may be pieces here and there that deserve some attention, but this story, in this form, is horrible. How embarrassing.

  190. Russ Crenshaw: What a bunch of BS. I detest fear mongers. If you buy into this article, go put on your aluminum foil hat and prepare for the apocalypse….what a crock.
    Jct: Baby deaths tripled in BC after the Fukushima Rain but Russ Crenshaw says not to worry, what’s 150 hot particles per West Coast resident in April 2011. So Russ, you’d better get your own tin foil hat and prepare for the good times you expect.

  191. Kindness says:

    Before calling someone nuts who is concerned about harmful things in our environment… read about what is out there… I read a lot because I know there is often some truth to even the most outrageous stories. Prayers all rights reserved
    Many hazardous waste sites contain certain amounts of barium. People that live near them may be exposed to harmful levels. The exposure will than be caused by breathing dust, eating soil or plants, or drinking water that is polluted with barium. Skin contact may also occur.
    The health effects of barium depend upon the water-solubility of the compounds. Barium compounds that dissolve in water can be harmful to human health. The uptake of very large amounts of barium that are water-soluble may cause paralyses and in some cases even death. Small amounts of water-soluble barium may cause a person to experience breathing difficulties, increased blood pressures, heart rhythm changes, stomach irritation, muscle weakness, changes in nerve reflexes, swelling of brains and liver, kidney and heart damage.
    Read more: http://www.lenntech.com/periodic/elements/ba.htm#ixzz2YwpNG99g

  192. Kindness says:

    Milk now has enough barium in it that hospitals have started using it for CAT Scans instead of having people drink straight barium. Our world is polluted but we all can stand up & tell our governments to clean it up to the best possible level that the earth can be cleaned up. Prayers arr http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Healthday/story?id=5017777&page=1 http://www.lenntech.com/periodic/elements/ba.htm Barium can react to all most all non metals and often forms poisonous compounds.

  193. Samples of milk taken across the United States have shown radiation at levels 2000 percent higher than EPA maximums…The Food and Drug Administration and the Environmental Deception Protection Agency, instead of refusing to prohibit the sale of tainted foods and mandatory testing of foods produced and harvested from the Pacific Coast, have simply raised the “acceptable levels” of radioactive material in foods.
    Jct: Just like when they turned off the fallout detectors before the plume hit the West Coast. If they don’t know, it didn’t happen.

  194. Russ Crenshaw says:

    What a bunch of BS. I detest fear mongers. If you buy into this article, go put on your aluminum foil hat and prepare for the apocalypse….what a crock.

  195. Michael Drotor says:

    This article is fear mongering BS. Just live your lives and love as much as possible. If you grow a third arm, figure out a neat way to use it!

  196. Ekaterina says:

    The level of radioactivity is constantly rising. Every new nuclear power station means more radioactive wastes. Idealy getting energy using nuclear power stations should be forbidden in whole world. Thats too dangerous.
    Please sign the petition and help to save a great territory on Earth from a disaster.
    We struggle against the Corporation “Rosatom” to protect our common home from a possible nuclear disaster. We oppose the building of the worlds biggest radioactive wastes repository. We call on all not indifferent people to help us to defeat the evil!
    https://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/v-v-putin-to-forbid-building-of-the-radioactive-wastes-repository-near-krasnoyarsk

  197. Todd Gardiner says:

    You are describing what this image is incorrectly.

    A quote from the data source: “THIS IS NOT A REPRESENTATION OF THE RADIOACTIVE PLUME CONCENTRATION”

    http://www.asrltd.com/japan/plume.php

  198. Just Kim says:

    Wow!! I really hope you are being sarcastic because that was just cold.. there are no “subhumans”….can you tell I’m Canadian?

    JackD
    They use the Burakumin, for the dirty work. Always have. Their deaths aren’t counted because they are considered subhuman.
    They don’t risk the lives of the well educated plant workers any more than they need to. That’s what poor people are for.

  199. KLM says:

    All credibility of this article was lost for me when they quoted “Natural News”.

    • Truelitistnot says:

      Referring to Bloomberg as real journalism is absolutely laughable. You mean the cut & paste edited stories from the newswire mainstream media? Can’t call that journalism.

  200. Loreenbreakey says:

    This is pretty scary stuff but I am a senior

  201. markh says:

    The Fukushima Cleanup Effort https://www.facebook.com/groups/391748190893768/?bookmark_t=group

    Real Solutions, now.

  202. JackD says:

    Check out the Farewinds Associates website, for more information on what’s going on. Listen to what a nuclear engineer has to say about Fukashima.

    • Kathleen says:

      Thanks for the tip. I checked it out, and the website is very, very informative. By the way, it’s “Fairewinds Associates.”

  203. Trevor says:

    Everything is killing us now. We live 3 times longer then 300 years ago (totally pulled that out of the air, but you get my drift). Stop freak’n worrying about everything. If your supposed to die, guess what? You will. Live happy, live with love. Stop worrying about other crap we are fed by the media and everyone who thinks they know better. Just my 2 cents.

    • JackD says:

      Yup, you totally made that up.

      BTW, it’s not just about killing us, but also about dramatic increases in the rate of birth defects and childhood cancer. Go cruise pictures of radiation induced birth defects. You’ll have a good time.

      Children are highly susceptible to to genetic damage from radiation because their cells are actively dividing. Older guys like me, not so much. But selfishness won’t stop me from worrying over the legacy we leave future generations.

    • Stoned_Goddess says:

      the only reason our ancestors had a lower average age is because they died more from accidents, didn’t have proper medical treatment, etc. Many people from back then still lived just as long, if not longer than the average person today.

  204. jon t banning says:

    whoever wrote this article should be banned from writing. What a bunch of BULLSHIT propaganda

  205. Mary says:

    Buy a Geiger counter and measure the radiation yourself. It is a lot easier.

  206. PLease Reply says:

    What is the map of? Gama rays, alpha rays? beta particles? How about numbered units of measurement to go with the colors so I can see how much radiation it actually is. I wouldn’t b e asking this if the article wasn’t so extreme as to ask us not to eat vegetables, fruit, milk or meat grown in california (that’s hard on the economy). Not to mention not drinking tap water, rain water and snow. Also this article quotes a Dr. saying there has been a 35% increase in infant mortality rate, this .gov website shows this is record low for California’s infant mortality rate. http://www.cdph.ca.gov/Pages/NR12-020.aspx

  207. Pamela Lents says:

    I know this to be true. I live in So. CA and have been tested for alpha, beta and gamma radiation. I had all the symptoms and didn’t know what was going on until I was tested. I have been able to get rid of the beta and gamma but still am fighting the alpha. Radiation is airborn and it hit us hard. People suffer from normalcy bias. It is true, I felt like I was slowly dying…and I was.

  208. Donna says:

    Actually, the thyroid IS very sensitive to radiation, and medical professionals advise NOT increased intake of iodized salt following increased radiation exposure, but iodine tablets.

    I do blame the Japanese government for this, however. They had known for years prior to this disaster, that the shell of the nuclear plant was very weak, and considering the whole of Japan is high risk for earthquakes and subsequent tsunamis, they should have done MUCH more to enhance the structures.

  209. Macy says:

    What a poorly written article. The citations are horrible and lead to nothing but advertisements.

  210. Chad G says:

    and the over 4,000 nuclear weapons that have been tested on this planet do nothing right? Deep water tests done in the same ocean, high altitude in the same region.. Sorry but this article does nothing but make me angry at the author for trying to freak people out.

    • jon says:

      this is diffent than atomic explosion do some research

    • Don says:

      Chad a nuclear explosion is relatively clean. Most of the radiation is destroyed in the blast. A melt down is far, far worse. Perhaps you should do a little more research before you lash out at someone.

  211. Cindy M says:

    My son lives in Japan and they are fine. As for the most part. I agree with the person/persons saying about Chemo and such, it is true, JP radiation is nothing compared to let’s see, cell phones, chemo, x-rays, microwaves. C”mon ppl think about it, you are worried about the radiation from JP,worry about Monsanto products. You all have been eating poisons for years now

  212. john says:

    I see nothing but a bunch of idiots responding to this article in addition to the one who wrote it.

  213. cjay says:

    “I don’t know about the rest of you, but that one way trip to colonize Mars is looking pretty damn attractive right now.”

    Really?????? Even if you found a way to terraform Mars, you have to deal with the fact Mars is missing a magnetic field that would block solar/cosmic radiation levels that would kill us.

    • jon says:

      their are magnets made on earth many times stronger than that of the earths magnetic field, im sure something can be or already has been made

  214. Sam says:

    SatCom
    Seems alarmist, conspiracy theory to me. Taht said, the media keeps all kinds of negative stuff form the generla public for fear of riots I’m sure.

    Wow, talk about a conspiracy theory…

  215. Michael Zeleny says:

    Trolling tree huggers is shooting fish in a barrel.

  216. OldHippyPatriot says:

    my sister had cancer…they used radiation and chemo, so maybe a little won’t really hurt us

  217. Rick L says:

    Radiation spikes detected in the weeks and months following the Fukushima accident caused concern and sometimes panic. One day a higher-than-permissible level of iodine-131 (300 becquerels per liter, or less than 0.00008 parts per trillion) was detected in the drinking water in Tokyo. People immediately emptied stores of bottled water. However, the amount of contamination in Tokyo water was so low, Tokyoites would have had to drink 6 quarts of it a day for a month to get the same radiation dose that an airline crew member receives in a year of flying between Los Angeles and Tokyo.

  218. Rick L says:

    FALSE! Although the crippled nuclear reactors themselves still pose a danger, no one, including personnel who worked in the buildings, died from radiation exposure. Even considering the upper boundary of estimated effects, there is unlikely to be any detectable increase in cancers in Japan, Asia or the world except close to the facility, according to a World Health Organization report. There will almost certainly be no increase in birth defects or genetic abnormalities from radiation

    • JackD says:

      They use the Burakumin, for the dirty work. Always have. Their deaths aren’t counted because they are considered subhuman.

      They don’t risk the lives of the well educated plant workers any more than they need to. That’s what poor people are for.

  219. Jack says:

    Holy Cow. there are some cukoos on this sight. WOW!

  220. Joe Boone says:

    I am confident that with all of the money we are spending on defense here in the US, we’ll be protected against this radiation.

  221. Journalism101 says:

    This is a perfect example of fear mongering and anti atomic energy from an incredibly outdated source of information, the author didn’t even bother to look at the updated version of the study. This particular info is from a 2011 scientific publication in one journal that is hardly recognized. If you know nothing about atomic energy or radiation contamination, why would you write an article to scare people who are also uninformed on this topic? Seems like the author is simply trying to scare people into sharing this article for the sole sake of personal benefit. Take some time to learn how to write an article based on informed, accurate, and updated information because this is garbage.

  222. Shannon Nusom says:

    Pineapples from a tree???? Joesph Purtill youre an idiot….pineapples dont grow on trees….And you ppl expect everyone to listen to you all….I think NOT!!!

  223. ML Walker says:

    As scary as the thought of this is, I doubt seriously that the radiation made a straight beeline for the US and did not spread to the North, South or East as the picture indicates. There are air and sea currents to take into account to keep it from going only one direction. Even Krakatoa’s eruption did not go in only one direction.

  224. Hedgehog666 says:

    Mars??? There is 1000 times more radiation there……..What an idiot……

  225. Tiffany says:

    There are alot of people in the comments saying this is not true BUT have you seen deadliest catch this season they are in Alaska and they have been pulling pot of crab with 300 in them and only 2 being good….. something is wrong

    • Matt says:

      And right before they showed that, the Captain of the Time Bandit explained that they are like that because of the severe ice last year. When the water temp changes, the crab have a harder time moulting their shells. Creates a “dirty” crab.

    • Jack says:

      Go crabbing before you say what you don’t know. Juvenile crabs and females go back in the water. I have limited in an hour and in the exact same bay I have spent all day and come away with two keepers. It is normal.

    • george M says:

      So your argument is that the pacific ocean is RUINED by a radiation spill in Japan because they clearly ruined all 187,189,915,062,857,142,857 gallons of water just like that!? 187 Quintillion! Can you even tell me how many 100 quintillion is? It is more than Billions and more than Trillions and more than Quadrillions and then when you get to Quintillions you have to have 187 of those. Yeah that is a SUPER MEGA WHOLE FREAKING LOT of water!

      Move along nothing to see here unless you swear by the genius of deadliest catch! (chuckle)

      • JackD says:

        No, but heavy metals including radioactive ones concentrate in the top of the food chain.

        Avoid eating tuna and other top predators.

    • george M says:

      You know what is 1000 times more dangerous than any contaminant you could ever pour into the ocean? Any living growing organism or parasite like red tide that has the capacity to double and double and double until it suffocates the entire ocean in a tarp of algae. THAT sort of mechanic is far more dangerous to the oceans and therefore to people than any single “spill” of anything!

  226. SatCom says:

    Seems alarmist, conspiracy theory to me. Taht said, the media keeps all kinds of negative stuff form the generla public for fear of riots I’m sure. ANother form of control by disinformation. Guess I’ll be losing a lot of weight since we cannot eat anything any more…. bummer.

  227. Verna says:

    So you advocate we go to Mars and destroy it the way we are the Earth? I live in the Pacific Northwest and still find that thought abhorrent. Planets are NOT disposable. Fix it or die, people.

    • Neil says:

      Soooo – what exactly is there to “destroy” on Mars? – Its a big red rock at this point with little atmosphere – nothing to wreck…

  228. Wardog Blaze says:

    This is so wrong it hurts

  229. James Savik says:

    Alarmist rubbish. The various nuclear powers have set over over 1000 warheads since 1945. And you think Fukashima is where all those rads are coming from?

  230. Clay Ferguson says:

    I predicted that this would eventually end up killing all life in the oceans. I’m glad I was wrong…or maybe we just haven’t seen enough new generations of fish and other life to know the full impact. If all ocean life died, I think that would end up killing all humans too right? Something to do with oxygen levels.

  231. Robert Lilja says:

    Either this is fake or some explaining is needed. I’ve worked at a nuclear facility and as far as I know water cannot become radioactive so how can there be radioactive rain for instance? I can understand sea water since it contains particles of other substances that can become radioactive but rain is just plain water.

    Furthermore, who estimated the lifespan of the radiation to 30000 years? For all that I know particles that’s become radioactive disintegrate much more quickly.

  232. Philip Boutin says:

    How interesting that known radiation physicists disagree with your argument. Their argument is based on a career studying radioactive isotopes.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-10/fukushima-radiation-proves-less-deadly-than-feared.html

    • Homer says:

      Their “argument” is based on a career pay check. My PRM-9000 says they are blowing smoke up our butts

      • MDavis says:

        Yes, they get paid, but they are also living in it, visiting Fukishima and raising their families in the Northwest. You think that a paycheck is more important than the safety of your family?

  233. andrew says:

    We need more iodine salt to add to our food.

    • Homer says:

      Funny how a week ago our gvt said they were wrong, salt is now “good for you”…..EAT MORE SALT…..

  234. Blaine Cooper says:

    So in other words do not eat just starve to death and let it be? ok WTF?

  235. doesntmatter says:

    we got 99 problems…and radiation poisoning has BEEN one o_o

  236. PHUGEMAWL says:

    If this is so deadly then how come we never hear anything about victims in Hawaii? Just look at the Google map shown above and it clearly shows Hawaii in the direct path of the “cloud”, thousands of miles closer than mainland USA …. think I’d better stop eating pineapples!

  237. ravenmaven says:

    Too little…too late

  238. John Cook says:

    Why don’t “they” care?
    Do they have cancer cures they hide from us?
    YES! that’s a no brainer – cannabis and various herbs and spices do a great job of curing/protecting against cancer)
    P.s. the other reason Fukushima is not examined properly is that it was actually a nuclear arrack on Japan by Israel. As punishment for offering to enrich uranium for Iran. Go google it. As a simple experiment , try finding pix or video of the tsunami wave wiping out stuff, any video will do, the thing is you Never see any of the stuff ahead of the wave being significantly damaged. The earthquake happened 15 minutes or so before the wave. A richter scale 8.9/9.0 is so intensive everything should be flattened. But it’s not even visibly damaged at All! Go figure, it was fake. The reactor that exploded most violently (endangering the fuel rod cooling pools) was the one (number 4) that was COMPLETELY EMPTY OF FUEL RODS AND TOTALLY SHUT DOWN). Yet it went off like a small nuke – that’s because Mossad put a small (and dirty) nuke in there. I know this Sounds fruit loop but check it out yourself (if you are brave enough, lol)
    The real reason for the meltdowns was a computer virus called Stuxnet that the us and Israel had developed to attack Iran. The isralies also used it to attack Japan. Once infected the Fukushima plant was just waiting for anything to upset the smooth running of the plant – then it goes into action totally fuking all the systems and physically breaking pumps and other control elements.
    I don’t know if they used h bombs to make the tsunami or just waited for a natural earth quake – I think both, the hydrogen bombs were in place waiting for a natural quake of a reasonable size to trigger themselves (plural) and the Stuxnet is triggered by the emergency.

    • Michael J. Marsalek says:

      Google what John? Obviously you have spent time researching and evaluating the available information on Fukushima and the medicinal properties of cannabis. Unfortunately, you have presented your findings in a way that lacks credibility although there is every reason to believe there is a great deal of truth to what you are saying. It is curious that Fukushima presents the single greatest global nuclear threat and very little is said about it while Iran is only a minor nuclear irritation and that’s all the U.S. government whines about. Tell us more.

    • Chaim Naveh says:

      Step back away from the computer with your hands in the air. It is obvious you know nothing and it can be dangerous to others who know nothing. Have you ever been captured by aliens and taken to their spaceship?

  239. manoliuval says:

    2011 US NAVY ATTACKED JAPAN I

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PJlBUsY0o6U

    2011 US NAVY ATTACKED JAPAN II

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjlchP52aFs

  240. Victoria says:

    I was wondering how long it would take before this was made public. We are definitely in for it.

    • wayne wright says:

      just for conversation sake…when i was growing up ’50s…the clouds from US and USSR nuclear bomb tests were always floating down on people…I wonder how they match up to this latest? We were never told to “get Iodine” or take detox…buut I was in a country family..low income…no tv…but we could not “eat the first snow!”it was full of “pollution!!”

    • National Socialist says:

      Ain’t gonna happen even the Jews are scared

Leave a Reply

© 2013 Pakalert Press. All rights reserved.
https://ilmukomunikasi.uad.ac.id/
https://dtp.bengkuluprov.go.id/
https://prime.edu.pk/blogs/
https://upardigital.uparsistem.edu.co/
https://hotelarjuna.com/
https://dpk.banggaikep.go.id/
https://janestrinket.co.id/
https://serioustech.co.uk/
https://bestwesterndrycleaners.co.uk/
https://dev.iphi.or.id/
https://skynetsolutions.co.in/
https://sanbuka.co.id/
https://shop2.sanbuka.co.id/
https://dyon.sanbuka.co.id/
https://shop.sanbuka.co.id/
https://tangerangmotor.co.id/
https://bangsatangiisuk.co.id/
https://bidkoin.id/
https://binausaha.my.id/
https://iphijateng.or.id/
https://iteso.co.id/
https://rblogistics.co.id/
https://zteindonesia.co.id/
https://processthink.co.uk/
https://lynxlolerservices.co.uk/
https://g4x.co.uk/
https://emleather.co.za/
https://smkn2jiwan.sch.id/
https://theparivartan.co.in/
https://demo.apel.co.id/
https://www.smkn1sgs.sch.id/
https://menstruationstassen-test.com/
https://www.neubau-immobilie-leipzig.de/
https://www.thefarmwifelife.com/
https://anhduongcompany.vn/
https://ttg.com.ar/
https://yanagz.com/
https://sportmatchcoaching.com/
https://flughafen-taxi-muenchen.com/
https://mts-mqtebuireng.sch.id/
https://indialawtimes.com/
http://dominicandreamgirl.com/
https://www.32sing.com/
https://espanahijos.com/
http://psiquiatraenprovidencia.cl/
http://2z25.com/
http://agapelux.com/
http://kmh-tea.com/
http://metabolitea.com/
http://itn-info.com/
https://www.cacciamotorworx.com/
https://dupsrl.shop/
https://quickbooktravles.com/
https://uvasi.ru/
https://discimus.com.br/
https://baizelshoecare.co.za/
https://amaronilogistics.eu/
https://gameofprint.de/
https://centrogaiaom.com/
https://www.vignet.net/
https://veganscure.com/
https://geze.com.ua/
https://maxtorcpro.com/
https://sajiddesigns.com/
https://grandkozmetik.mk/
https://javachatpodcast.com/
https://kelashartanah.my/
https://oncallorganicfood.com/
https://topproductsbasket.net/
https://henyodigital.com/
https://www.penzonerealty.com/
https://www.snaptosign.com/
https://www.svelaluxury.it/
https://afrilandforexboard.com/
https://foodfusionhk.com/
https://shop.drdavidgilpin.com/
https://threeriversmedicalgroup.com/
https://zmart.hk/
https://metatoursae.com/
https://losafoods.com/
https://runoved.ru/
https://toffeehousesweets.com/
https://toshow.us/
https://www.toytrucks.com.ph/
https://virtusmurano.com/
https://latisanery.com/
https://changelifeorganization.org/
https://chiapow.com/
https://bestcardiologistnashik.in/
https://jeansjourney.us/
https://inhawellness.com/
https://inland.website/
https://painfulparenting.com/
https://pakalertpress.com/
https://s3webservices.tech/
https://b4uage.com/
https://babycar.in/
https://luxuriousrentz.com/
https://agelessbeautylaserskinspa.com/
https://theonenews.in/
https://pickandgofurniture.com/
https://gadgeto.gr/
https://equalitynetworkllc.com/
https://tonyslavin.com/
https://myidlyrics.com/
https://downloadbusinesscourse.com/
https://aahanagroups.com/
http://runwithyourheart.site/
https://clocksportsnews.com/
https://bajahighland.com/
https://terraagrofertil.com.br/
https://gailelaine.com/
https://joyasvalldor.com/
https://juliansrecipes.com/
https://haamburg.com/
https://www.laidegoldskinclinic.com/
https://venec.mk/
https://fuelpumpexpress.com/
https://humanitarianstudies.ch/
https://panmarketllc.com/
https://topfroosh.com/
https://russellandcosolicitors.co.uk/
https://rocherocean.fr/
https://proconsultant.tech/
https://travel.savings.org/
https://evergreenpharmaceuticals.co.uk/
https://techfat.com/
https://goodfix.ir/
http://mycrimea.online/
https://cprnabzino.com/
https://espotting.com/
https://mold.maqopt.com.br/
https://puppiesanimals.com/
https://essentialblackmedia.com/
https://allindiastrengthwars.in/
https://saudepreciosa.com/
https://edeyselldigitals.com/
https://saltandpepperideas.com/
https://currentnewstv.in/
https://apologetics.ro/
https://flockgear.life/
https://hiremedubai.com/
https://afelleclothing.com/
https://famousstoreis.com/
https://dolmie.com/
https://topnotchdealz.net/
https://cryptoswaptrade.com/
https://theusaage.com/
https://dogbecat.com/
demo slot
SENGTOTO
SENGTOTO
LOGIN EVOSTOSO
DAFTAR EVOSTOTO
jebol togel
mikatoto
Slot Gacor
mikatoto
PREDIKSI TOTO MACAU
Bet168
obat penggugur kandungan
obat aborsi
cytotec
https://slot-thailand.unfangin.ac.id/
https://lisinoprila.net/
sarangslot
sarangslot
https://lib.radenintan.ac.id/js/-/gacorx/
dewalive
https://datapusdataru.jatengprov.go.id/pilihpengadilan/star777/
https://datapusdataru.jatengprov.go.id/elementor/asiabet/
https://datapusdataru.jatengprov.go.id/elementor/dewa4d/
Slot Thailand
https://datapusdataru.jatengprov.go.id/elementor/infini88/
https://datapusdataru.jatengprov.go.id/elementor/hoki88/
https://datapusdataru.jatengprov.go.id/elementor/boss88/
https://lib.radenintan.ac.id/pilihkoleksi/dewahoki/
https://lib.radenintan.ac.id/pilihkoleksi/gacor4d/
https://lib.radenintan.ac.id/pilihkoleksi/dewa4d/
https://bahisseninuyelik.com/
akun pro malaysia
slot gacor 777
SINGASARITOTO
SINGASARITOTO
JUMBOTOTO
MAFIATOTO
KARTUTOTO
ASUSTOGEL
BAIM4D
Bimabet
hujantoto
bet168
TOP1TOTO
TOP1TOTO
TOP1TOTO
TOP1TOTO
TOP1TOTO
TOP1TOTO
TOP1TOTO
TOP1TOTO
OKBTOGEL
OKBTOGEL
OKBTOGEL
OKBTOGEL LOGIN
TOPJITU
KARTUTOTO
SINGASARITOTO
JIMBASLOT
HUJANTOTO
JUMBOTOTO
OMETOTO
JAYA4D
TOPJITU
KARTUTOTO
KARTUTOTO
MILO4D
MILO4D
TOP1TOTO
sonic77
okbtogel link alternatif
okbtogel login
okbtogel
https://allisonrandolph.com/