Large Saucer UFO Found Buried In Antarctica! 1/13/17

44



Disc coords: 74°38’18.53″ S 164°31’48.53″ E
Caves: 66°33’12.33″S, 99°50’20.37″E — 66°36’12.69″S, 99°43’12.44″E
Secureteam10 is your supply for reporting the greatest in new UFO sighting information, information on the govt coverup, and the strange exercise going on on and off of our planet. Email us YOUR footage and assist us go on the good battle for disclosure!
➨E-mail me with your strategies & footage: TheSecureteam@gmail.com
➨Get Your Secureteam Shirt Listed here! http://secureteam.spreadshirt.com
➨Twitter: https://twitter.com/SecureTeam10
➨Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Secureteam10

Intro Music: Spellbound by Kevin Macleod
Outro Music: “Darkish Entice” by rh_tunes — www.Pond5.com

ALL footage used is both finished beneath the categorical authorization of the original operator, or is general public area and falls beneath procedures of Good Use. We are making this kind of substance offered for the applications of criticism, remark, review and information reporting which represent the ‘fair use’ of any this kind of copyrighted substance as furnished for in segment 107 of the US Copyright Legislation. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted perform for applications this kind of as criticism, remark, review and information reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

supply

44 Responses

  1. feralhunta says:

    foil hat brigade in all its glory…..

  2. When you "correct" the perspective of the bell shaped hole, you are in fact turning it to look like a bell. The way it sits in reality is not a bell shape. Also more than half of the hole is filled in and can clearly been seen via the light grey rock. That could very well be an ancient magma vent.

  3. the shadow on the right side of the "disc" indicates a depression not a raised disc. That's a hole IMO.

  4. Bob Thiym says:

    The only issue I have here. Is when I look at it myself. The image is dated 2009 and the caves are dated 2012 . Any explanations as to why this is?

  5. cyberteksrs says:

    You look at the wrong direction. The shadow is from the mountain.turn the picture 180

  6. Sly Cargo says:

    I think Tyler is experimenting on just how dumb the public is. He's probably laughing his ass off

  7. Austin Yost says:

    Part of politics is good publicity, just visiting Antarctica for a week and making a statement about global warming can boost and public figures cred. But it dose not mean they are lying!

  8. Bobbzie B. says:

    If you take the 'time tour' option to revisit the same location, then you can go back as far as 1984 to see the changing conditions as well as (I assume) the evolution of satellite optical quality?
    From 2009, where the alleged 'object' begins to appear, It clearly displays a decidedly less than circuliniar profile and where things more or less remain unchanged until the image depicted in this particular 'offering' from secureteam10.
    By the 31st of December 2016, the 'object' had reverted back to an outline displayed from 2009 onwards.
    Clearly whatever the dark shape is, it has been subject to countless harsh and extreme Antarctic weather conditions over the years which have variously buried and partially revealed whatever it might be time and again as satellites have passed over it.
    None of these images (even the clearest , as used by Sec.T10) give any real indication that what we're observing is a 'flying saucer' or some other kind of 'anomalous' object trapped in ice and slowly thereafter being disgorged…irrespective of the Sec.T10 narrators customary 'leaps of faith' that might suggest otherwise.
    There is of course another side to this 'mystery' that logic suggests would be worthy of consideration, as in  were this truly what Sec.T10 have implied, then surely don't you think that the ubiquitous 'security services' would have been all over it like a bad rash, and consequently 'doctored' the publically available evidence accordingly whilst they quietly set about instigating a 'retrieval' operation…or is the implication that they're just sitting back and, like us, watching the images until the 'object fully revels itself before they take action…
    …As the Scots would sarcastically suggest at such a totally implausible notion "Yeah…that'd be right!"

  9. Ken Haglock says:

    You can zoom in super close and see a detailed image to the caves but not the "UFO." Ok

  10. Halo. series says:

    than why isn't their people going their

  11. this could be a unknon object maybe a secret government project

  12. eiboer says:

    when you check google earth for the disk is blurred now :|

  13. Conspiracy theoriest or True facts?

  14. Changing Man says:

    mate you are crazy its just a shadow! get a life or maybe just a job to fill your time dude.

  15. Cave 2 (longitude>99.84060829057211 , latitude>-66.55328733745691) has now been obscured by some kind of intervention on Google Earth. Cave 1 is still visible though. Re the "large saucer" shape
    I can easily see enough in the it to be very curious. It is very unlikely to be a "layer of bedrock" with such round edges. I've seen nothing that rock in the rocky structures anywhere on the continent. Secureteam, in my view, is just presenting what they find—very little "reaching". KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!

  16. Dave Gerken says:

    74°33'48.30"S 164°29'39.23"E Take a look, It looks like a building or runway in the side of the hill.

  17. WJHenry 119 says:

    let up on the heavy shite man

  18. WJHenry 119 says:

    I think you let your mind wander

  19. WJHenry 119 says:

    you talk to fucking much! get to the fucking point

  20. Just Me says:

    a blade should be found in your ass. why do you people watch this,, complete BS

  21. rubbish in all fairness now

  22. Russ Barnes says:

    to me this is the best possible ufo that we can actually go see . so this is significant

  23. Moses Diaz says:

    omg thers no fuken UFO or anything that sticks out like a soar thumb

  24. this thing sticks out like a whinny lisp…a ridge shadow and a couple of caves…and a whole heap of suggestion…nice.

  25. Big Mike says:

    Looks like my wife's tit.

  26. Mohammad Ali says:

    it's look like breathing hole of large fish ? whale ? or killer whale ?

  27. 4:18 it could just be a hole in the ice under an overhang. the shadow maintains the left slant of the rest of the shadows shown, just with more overhang from the ice shelf. imm not saying its a face or even just some misleading hint, but im not saying its actualy what he is saying. there just more to this than whats being said, or posably even whats known.

  28. I´m sorry, but I have to stop. When you say "you can see those rocks and their shadow", then it´s to the upper right, not bottom left! You don´t have to be an expert to see this, so yeah… and as I saw this completely explains the "mysterious ebject… it´s a shadow

  29. Love this Channel! Those entrances are really weird and it really does look like a ufo or saucer of some type. very cool find

  30. Peter Nguyen says:

    Dude that's nothing

  31. Steven Jones says:

    View of cave 2 in maps.google is just a greenish blob now… that's all I see… bell-shaped opening has been obscured! can anyone verify?

  32. there's a mountain on the left casting the shadow nice try tho

  33. Jimn Bean says:

    Чо он сука курит? метх? ну он гонит в роде не Шумахер

  34. Green Sword says:

    are you fucking serious lol?

  35. phil east says:

    I for one welcome our new alien overlords

  36. Revolving landing bay?

  37. Jose Gaucin says:

    whats the name of that background music?

  38. @secureteam10 can you all tell me why the thumb nail and the photo on the right looks like an eye or is that just a coincidence

  39. Kal Kan says:

    Its water. The shadow is an incline. The UFO is water.

  40. Kevin Green says:

    It's melted ice this is no UFO

Leave a Reply

© 2017 Pakalert Press. All rights reserved.