Leaked Debate Agreement Shows Both Obama and Romney are Sniveling Cowards

truther October 17, 2012 7

John Cook | gawker

Time‘s Mark Halperin has made himself useful for once by obtaining, and publishing, a copy of the 21-page memorandum of understanding that the Obama and Romney campaigns negotiated with the Commission on Presidential Debates establishing the rules governing this month’s presidential and vice presidential face-offs. The upshot: Both campaigns are terrified at anything even remotely spontaneous happening.

They aren’t permitted to ask each other questions, propose pledges to each other, or walk outside a “predesignated area.” And for the town-hall-style debate tomorrow night, the audience members posing questions aren’t allowed to ask follow-ups (their mics will be cut off as soon as they get their questions out). Nor will moderator Candy Crowley.

Most bizarrely, given the way the debates have played out, the rules actually appear to forbid television coverage from showing reaction shots of the candidates: “To the best of the Commission’s abilities, there will be no TV cut-aways to any candidate who is not responding to a question while another candidate is answering a question or to a candidate who is not giving a closing statement while another candidate is doing so.” The “best of the Commission’s abilities” must be rather feeble, seeing as how almost every moment of the two debates so far was televised in split-screen, clearly showing shots of a “candidate who is not responding to a question while another candidate is answering a question.”

Which means some of the rules below that both campaigns stipulated to in a desperate attempt to wring any serendipity out of the events may be honored in the breach:

  • “The candidates may not ask each other direct questions during any of the four debates.”
  • “The candidates shall not address each other with proposed pledges.”
  • “At no time during the October 3 First Presidential debate shall either candidate move from his designated area behing the respective podium.”
  • For the October 16 town-hall-style debate, “the moderator will not ask follow-up questions or comment on either the questions asked by the audience or the answers of the candidates during the debate….”
  • “The audience members shall not ask follow-up questions or otherwise participate in the extended discussion, and the audience member’s microphone shall be turned off after he or she completes asking the questions.”
  • “[T]he Commission shall take appropriate steps to cut-off the microphone of any…audience member who attempts to pose any question or statement different than that previously posed to the moderator for review.”
  • “No candidate may reference or cite any specific individual sitting in a debate audience (other than family members) at any time during a debate.”
  • For the town-hall debate: “Each candidate may move about in a pre-designated area, as proposed by the Commission and approved by each campaign, and may not leave that area while the debate is underway.”

Here’s the full document:
The 2012 Debates – Memorandum of Understanding Between the Obama and Romney Campaigns

 Full debate below, in 6 parts:

Add To The Conversation Using Facebook Comments

7 Comments »

  1. Ben from Texas October 18, 2012 at 9:47 pm - Reply

    Well its after the debate and none of the above”restrictions” were followed,this story is either BS or they decided to ignore their own rules they set up before the debate..The mics were NOT cut off..You could see the reactions from both men from the questions asked ..NONE of the rules were followed,but what do we expect from the media and politicians?The truth?.HA not a chance..The so called ”moderator interrupted Romney over 25 times and only interrupted Obama only 9 times..Obama got over 3 minutes longer to speak..If you truly care about this country and not yourself ,vote Romney.If you want to be a socialists/communist nation vote for Obama,its your bed America.

  2. Stan Sikorski October 18, 2012 at 4:07 am - Reply

    I’m writing in Ron Paul.

    • Ben from Texas October 18, 2012 at 9:50 pm - Reply

      Your throwing your vote for Obama if you write in Ron Paul and wasting your vote.Writing in Ron Paul that has OOOOO chance of winning is a foolish throw away vote….I prefer Ron Paul myself but he has no chance of winning..Your just protesting and givingObamination a chance to win destroying America.

  3. Anonymous October 17, 2012 at 3:21 pm - Reply

    IF the company you work for tells you to VOTE republican, help save america VOTE FOR RON PAUL, other wise go ahead and throw america and your children to the wolves……………..

    • Ben from Texas October 18, 2012 at 9:54 pm - Reply

      Voting for Ron Paul would be throwing your vote away,he has OOOO chance of winning..Your only giving Obamination a vote.

  4. ARIZONA October 17, 2012 at 11:13 pm - Reply

    GEE mommy, if I’am good to day can I watch the circus on TV tonight,two of the most famous clowns of all time will be on MSM’s …. “DOG AND PONY SHOW”…………………………………..

  5. Mad Angel October 17, 2012 at 2:14 pm - Reply

    I'm so sick of scripted 'reality' shows…

Leave A Response »

Click here to cancel reply.

SENGTOTO
SENGTOTO
LOGIN EVOSTOSO
DAFTAR EVOSTOTO
jebol togel
mikatoto
Slot Gacor
mikatoto