[ad_1]
1. Indian Historians: Notorious or Ignorant
More than a hundred yrs back, when Heritage of India was penned underneath British affect, there was no space for Ramayan and Mahabharat as historical functions. They were epics and of no significance for students. It is astonishing that India is a person country whose background has been penned by its enemies and the whole nation nevertheless follows it. No question the background was a strategic attack on Indian civilization and lifestyle that paved way for western lifestyle into the nation. With time, fact is evolving again. Science of India that was denied is now approved via western affect. The myths are quickly showing to be background. And a person these types of background is Ram Sethu. Because, it is a background of Hindus, politics and literates are not completely ready to accept it as fact.
If they are so smart, enable them go via this article. I obstacle them via couple queries talked about in bold in this article.
Allow us have a track record of what politicians and historians (British penned background literates) say about Ram Sethu.
Historian B.D. Chattopadhyay of Jawaharlal Nehru University states the archaeological file states absolutely nothing of the kind. There is no proof of a human existence in the subcontinent, he states, prior to around 250,000 to 300,000 yrs back. It is commonly believed man’s hominid ancestors did not depart their African house until about two million yrs back.
Quite vital place in this article is that Mr. Chattopadhyay has forgot to be aware that what is mentioned of hominid ancestors is also a perception – a perception generated by Western men and women and adopted by Mr. Chattopadhyay – not Reality, not Science. Surely Ramayan, if a perception is a perception of japanese men and women – Indian Individuals. Mr. Chattopadhyay is hoping to introduce a perception clash.
Why Mr. Chattopadhyay would like to defy a accurate instance with a fake perception? Does Mr. Chattopadhyay want to say that Lord Rama is deep in the heart of billions of Indians to this date without having any fact? Can fake beliefs find so deep root in society and for so very long time?
I examine a similar comment from N Ramanujam. Head, Post Graduate Division of Geology and Study Centre, V.O. Chidambaram University, Tuticorin.
He mentioned that Adam’s Bridge is only a chain of shoals amongst the Palk Strait and the Gulf of Mannar, developed by sedimentation owing to very long shore currents.
Outlining the bridge’s geological background, he mentioned each the Palk Strait and the GoM were once portion of the Cauvery basin, which was fashioned during the separation of India and Antarctica about 70 million yrs back during the `Gondwana period.’
They were combined till a ridge was fashioned in the region owing to thinning of earth’s crust. The development of this ridge augmented the coral growth in the region.
“The coral address acted as a `sand trapper’ major to the development of Rameswaram Island,” Dr. Ramanujam mentioned.
The very long shore currents on the southern facet of island developed a discontinuous shoreline eastward from Dhanuskodi to Talaimannar, which’s the Adam’s Bridge.
Allow us see what Mr. Ramanujam has mentioned:
How many these types of Chain of Shoals bridging two nations is recognised to Dr. Ramanujam? Is there any other Geographical assemble anywhere in the entire world – deposits of shoals together the coast does not say that it bridges two land parts?
Again Mr. Ramanujam is using assist of a different perception to conquer the fact. He is conversing of Gondwana theory, a theory that has no concrete proof – an imaginary thesis with some scientific logic at the rear of it. Hundreds of these types of theory can be generated centered on Geographical ideas, but that do not defy a concrete purpose of existence.
Why did Gondwana theory depart a trace of only One Bridge on the World?
Quite vital – Ramanujam is not able to change the names of two locations as Dhanuskodi and Talaimannar which are not English names as they by now exist, and consequently effectively accepts a controversial English title of Adam’s Bridge as an alternative of Ram Setu. Mr. Ramanujam could extremely conveniently put his theory with the title of the Bridge even now as Ram Setu. But he finishes up in indicating that is Adam’s Bridge – WHY?
Why did Mr. Ramanujam accept Adam’s theory to be proper? Does Mr. Ramanujam want to assist that Adam and Eve existed and Lord Rama didn’t exist?
If yes, then Adam and Eve existed in India on your own as the bridge is in India – Again controversy – as Manu Shatrupa would be much more recognised names in this region and analogy to Adam and Eve. Furthermore, acceptance of Adam’s Bridge is acceptance that it was make by Adam. Really, the logic fits opposite to them – how can the very first guy on earth make a bridge of that quantity? He would be immature at very first position, he is on your own at next position and why will he ever endeavor to bridge the sea? While the only proof is with India, no logic fits to the title as ‘Adam’s Bridge’. This obviously reflects the Christian mentality hoping to impose and kill Hindu greatness. And poor Historians of India, introduced up in the schooling procedure of English, not able to crack the boundary of fake arrogance of being superior literary, appears to be helplessly indicating that Ram Setu Bandh is not historical. They cannot even keep a petty eyesight that humans have make wall of length of Good wall of China that is obvious from even Satellite what would prevent humans to make Ram Setu Bandh and what is astonishing or opposing to the actuality that it was crafted as a portion of Ramayan as a background.
Does Mr. Ramanujam want to say that if Adam crafted it, it is background, but if Lord Rama crafted it it is a Fantasy and a organic assemble?
Professor Dupey states that as for each Archeological survey, continues to be from Ayodhya controversial web page has discovered temple continues to be whose age do not go outside of 600 B.C.
Mr. Dubey: Do you want to say that if I make a temple right now, you will conclude that Lord Rama existed given that right now and not prior to?
Temples are make and rebuild and their age can only say about the age of the temple and the age of the identity whose worship is finished in the temple.
We will need to realize certain details in this article, modern day Archeology and Science is significantly distinct than what used to exist in historical India. For instance, outdated temples of India, nevertheless current, were crafted on a distinct technology than what we find in modern day civil engineering. This does not signify that historical archeology was not owning mathematics maturity – in actuality, if we glimpse at Temples of India, Jagannath Puri temple for instance, we do not find any iron or pillars used to make the temple – nevertheless it stands from hundreds of yrs to a top of close to two hundred ft.
Believe that Puri temple would have been razed some 10000 yrs back, what technology or archeological proofs would be derived to conclude that the temple was two hundred ft superior?
Equally, the Ram Setu bandh has seen ages, and that far too not on land, but in sea – a turbulent sea. The main of the mass is by now washed off – a issue to be pondered is that what continues to be is just a trace of the true bridge – not the whole bridge as it was.
Ramayan mentions that the bridge was crafted above the sea water, with assist of Sea – this implies that there was no supporting archeology concerned in setting up the bridge – this is conveniently supported by the failure of Archeology ground to trace these types of constructs underneath ground. But the existence of shoals under the bridge and their type point out that they cannot be discovered in sea in the method it exists at Ram Sethu.
Now, Mr. Dubey accepts that the age of Shoals discovered at Ram Sethu goes close to 1 million yrs. He misguides men and women, as he is a literate of Heritage penned by British, that Ramayan was very first penned close to 10000 yrs back and not 1 million yrs back. Mr. Dubey, in this article is a basic calculation for you to even more look into:
The age of the bridge as for each scientific dating will come to close to 1 million yrs. As for each Hindu scriptures, Ramayan took position in ‘Treta Yug’. Calculating by Hindu scriptures (Treta Yug with a tenure of 12,ninety six,000 yrs, Dwapar Yug with a tenure of 8, 64,000 yrs, Kali Yug has just seen 5,000 yrs): We know that Treta Yug was prior to Dwapar Yug. So, a person issue is pretty evident. The Bridge was built at least 8,64,000 yrs back, i.e., .86 million yrs back, which is rather near to 1 million yrs. Treta Yuga itself is 1.three million yrs of age.
How is that scientific age of the shoals and the Hindu calendar age of Lord Rama matches just? Will Mr. Dubey and other historians dare to arrive out of the falsehood of our enemy teachings and try to take a look at some mathematics of Hindus prior to they say make these types of stupid comparison of scientific ages?
2. Investigation of Valmiki Ramayan above RAM SETHU
Now, enable us go into the Valmiki Ramayan and dig out much more background out of it. Allow us be absolutely sure that if we want to dig background, we have to touch Valmiki Ramayan on your own and not any other Ramayan, simply because all other Ramayan are penned with function of endorsing Ramayan and recording the occasion.
Listed here are certain details from Valmiki Ramayan to be viewed as:
1. There is no other e-book than Ramayan that has put into scriptures describing these types of geographical constructs.
2. Ramayan states that it was make underneath the supervision of an Architect Nala – son of the biggest Architect of all times ‘Vishwakarma’ (Note: ‘Vishwakarma’ is a designation presented to the biggest archeologist and builder of the era in historical Hindu society, a similar apply as we have in modern day entire world of ‘Nobel Prize’). Thus, the e-book will make absolutely sure that these types of a bridge can be built by only architect of maximum skill.
Why do the politicians mislead the nation by indicating that Lord Rama was a Superman who make the bridge, when Ramayan obviously states that it is not Lord Rama but the Architect Nala and Neela who make the bridge?
three. The bridge was (Ramayan mentions the bridge built in 5 days: fourteen + twenty + 21 + 22 + 23 = a hundred yojans) a hundred Yojans very long and 10 Yojans broad. Details to be viewed as in this article:
four. The data starts from fourteen yojans as very first working day, which is less than other day’s data, confirming a logic that very first working day as a beginning experienced taken time to equipment up all Vanars. Second working day it took momentum and relaxation of the days the length of the bridge built is discovered to be just about identical. A logical summary of this kind is designed only when the occasion have transpired in truth.
Why did Valmiki thrust his creativeness to get the bridge completed only in 5 days? He could have properly amplified the variety of days to support men and women of right now realize it much more logically. Or he could have even decreased the variety of days to spotlight the energy of Lord Rama.
5. The data that much more than a crore (10 million) Vanaras were concerned in constructing it, appears to be logical to in shape to assist the quantity of the bridge built. Now, the rely may perhaps not be specific, but certainly Valmiki would like to say that there was a big endeavor drive doing work for the bridge.
Valmiki could have conveniently demonstrated Lord Rama profitable the fight with couple hundred Vanars as his soldiers – why 10 million?
six. The width vs. length ratio also seems to be scientific and supportive to support have these types of a big mass across the bridge. The bridge is broad plenty of so as to stand up to the fat of crores of Vanaras and allow for passage to all of them.
7. The bridge is mentioned to be crafted in 5 days, offering an concept that bridge experienced to be crafted in a extremely quick period of time, failing which the Opponent King Ravana would have arrive to know about it and would have attacked never ever allowing for the bridge to be built. Thus, the period fits the war logic.
8. The bridge is mentioned to be built by close to a crore Vanaras, the rely fits the probability of having the bridge built in these types of a small time – a big endeavor drive carrying out it. While, the methodology of construction is not elaborated and shortened by mentioning that several ‘Yantras’ or Machinery were used to make the bridge, but it gives an indication that machinery were utilized to do the endeavor. It should really be a subject matter to review about our past. Valmiki Ramayan: Yuddha Kanda, 22.60:
‘Hastimatran Mahakayah Pashananshch Mahabalah
Parvatanshch Samutpatya Yantraiyah Parivahanti Cha’
What was the will need to point out that certain Machineries were used for setting up the bridge? How did an historical guy imagine of machineries?
9. Quite interestingly, Rama is not mentioned to have crafted the bridge and the place clarifies that constructing it was the skill of an architect – Nala and not Rama or Hanuman, the hero of the e-book. Had Ramayan been a fantasy of Maharishi Valmiki, he would conveniently fantasized and penned a little something like Rama crafted a bridge of Arrows as Rama was the hero in fantasy. But it is not so, generating a person imagine that it is not fantasy writing.
Why didn’t he inform the entire world that it was Lord Rama who builds it and give the credit history to another person else of this excellent happening? After all, Lord Rama was the hero of his creativeness.
10. Ramayan also depicts the components used in generating the bridge clarifying that it was a probability, but not underneath creativeness of human capacity underneath technology assist of right now.
11. Viewing the time constraint, it seems to be logical to have Vanars who are brisk in their movement amassing components and fitting it in position as directed.
12. The locations talked about in Ramayan just matches to the present-day spot of the bridge, as a result confirming that the e-book is not a story.
13. The length of the bridge matches to what is talked about in Ramayan.
So, searching at Ramayan on your own a person can conclude that the Bridge is not a organic assemble. Possessing verified on the place of Bridge on your own that Ramayan is not a e-book of myth, but a e-book of Heritage, it straight absent brings the fact that Maharishi Valmiki was the very first Historian recognised to guy variety
three. Present Findings on RAM SETHU and their analysis
Even so, we will need to even more examine present-day results as properly.
- The very first issue to think about is that underneath the present-day scientific evaluation, the bridge is proved to have a chain of shoals is thirty to 35 km very long in Palk Road, and its exceptional curvature confirms that it is guy designed, and is not a Geographical Construct at all.
- Archeological results have verified that very first symptoms of human inhabitants in Sri Lanka date again to primitive age of about 1,750,000 yrs of the identical era as Ramayan (‘Treta Yug’, which lies just mid way to higher than variety).
- Sri Lankan Government has finished Archeological Study and discovered some extremely fascinating data:
- A mountain protected totally with natural crops of identical type that is discovered in Himalayas. There is no other mountain in whole Sri Lanka of that variety. This stands as an proof that the mountain was introduced by Lord Hanuman to Sri Lanka – How was this finished is subject matter to review? To my awareness, Sri Yantra of Hindu myth (or may perhaps be similar constructs) is essentially a anti-gravitation theory which was know to our Rishis in these days and these items were doable only by these types of usually means. Someday, science will certainly realize this.
- Ashok Vatika is traced with complete Greenery and while soil. With a gap of rarely 10-twenty meters, soil quickly turns to be black and burnt and it stretches to miles. This remarkably unnatural and it stands to confirm that Lord Hanuman experienced burnt Lanka.
There are many other proofs that have arrive up, but I think about these two details as sturdy as the Bridge itself.
Can our Historians seek the advice of the British again and make much more theory close to these evidences, so that they can be included in Heritage publications in opposition to Ramayan?
- From Ayodhya to Sri Lanka, most of the locations even now keep the names as it was close to a million yrs back. Even the devastating Muslim invasion could not reduce the names. Ayodhya, Chitrakut, Panchvati, Rameswaram, Lanka – all the names are as talked about in the e-book. Rameswaram is the position in which Lord Rama worshipped Lord Shiva and founded the idol ‘Shiv Lingam’, exist to date as a position of worship. Ramayan talks about Mahendragiri Mountain as the maximum place and greatest place to check out across the sea. Geographically, it is verified that Mahendragiri is the maximum mountain in that place and gives a visibility of close to 60 km vary.
Why don’t these politicians and historians say how are these talked about in Ramayan? Did these locations pre-existed and Valmiki traveled a large amount to make this story? Or these locations were named immediately after men and women examine Valmiki Ramayan?
The much more logical reply is, these locations pre-existed and the occasion took position which Valimiki wrote as poetic background.
- One more vital fictitious subject matter of Ramayan is ‘Pushpak Viman’ – a vehicle that could just take aerial route to journey. No question the Pusphak Viman no much more exists, but it cannot be fantasy as we have similar air planes telling about it. What troubles the thought of Viman is the knowledge that technology has designed in present-day era and men and women were devoid of these types of superior-tech items in historical India. But then Ramayan gives a track record of Pushpak Viman in conditions of how it was acquired, therefore generating a person imagine that it was not a mere fantasy. It should really not be anticipated from the e-book Ramayan to describe the specifics of Pushpak Viman development. The issue that should really be questioned is in which the true scientific data of Hindu researches about constructing the Pushpak Viman acquired lost – and accurate background of India and entire world will evolve.
Do our Historians want to say that if Pushpak Viman existed then Valmiki would have talked about how it was crafted? How many background e-book of right now contains the scientific methodology of constructing machinery – why don’t our historians very first do this?
- What appears to be legendary to the Historians and Science is the thought of Monkey constructing the Bridge. But they ignore to develop the eyesight on this, purely simply because of their biased angle to defeating Hindu faith. We all know now that there are many species that do not exist now and the biggest recognised to human is Dinosaur. Why cannot distinct specie exist close to 1 million yrs back with the capacity of human intelligence and monkey like physical framework – a little something that was referred to as as Vanars in these days? Science do not ignore to point out that guy evolved out of monkeys – but defeats Hindus to think about that Vanars were the in amongst form of the evolution the proof current in these days. But no perspective would think about this, only simply because then the religion of peace would acquire then. But, there is no question that evolution theory is again a controversial theory current and taught to men and women, without having any scientific proof close to it.
- No historian can deny the actuality that there is a coincidence and only a person coincidence amongst a truth and its prevalence in a e-book referred to as Ramayan. As an alternative, of now owning set a path to find out how these types of issue took position, these catholic followers are only making use of all forces and theories to falsify a actuality.
Science is now indicating that the age of earth is close to four billion yrs – can science create a background of four billion yrs with concrete proof – no a person asks this issue and thinks science. No a person understands how many era of humanity evolved and acquired ruined given that the earth was fashioned. No a person understands when the earth was just fashioned. Actual fictions and stories lie on this facet as properly – but our dear Historians do not have the courage to flatter about it.
I do not realize, if these types of an wonderful assemble is not in the attain of modern day science, why cannot this bridge be put as a person of the Wonders? Why cannot it be detailed underneath Entire world Heritages (nevertheless sustain it as Hindu sacred position)? As an alternative, the anti-Hindu moves are motivating Congress to destroy the bridge.
If the destruction of a five hundred year outdated Babri Masjid is not tolerable and it developed havoc in the entire world, why is million year outdated constructs not secured? Thousands of Hindu temples have been ruined and are being ruined to date in Kashmir, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Malaysia, and so many other international locations. Neither media nor politics talks about it. Why should not Hindus stand now to shield Ram Sethu, which is a immediate proof of One million outdated background of India?
[ad_2]
Resource by Chanchal Malviya
