World War II – The Complete Collection Volume 3/10

Pakalert June 4, 2013 11

source

Add To The Conversation Using Facebook Comments

11 Comments »

  1. Alex Bresler February 2, 2016 at 5:38 am - Reply

    Thanks for posting these; this is the best WW2 series I've seen outside of the World at War

  2. Darren Hopkins February 2, 2016 at 5:38 am - Reply

    what a pile of american bull shit

  3. Patton3003 February 2, 2016 at 5:38 am - Reply

    A must watch documentary to get a firm grasp of the outlines of WW II. A needed basis to get into more details later!
    Unbiased, detailed and no Allied power is favored!
    A documentary to end all discussion that the other YouTube documentaries bring with them.

  4. Darren Hopkins February 2, 2016 at 5:38 am - Reply

    FED UP WITH THE PIG HEAD YANK ARROGANCE IN THESE VIDEOS. ITS AS IF THEY WON THE WAR! AFTER COMING IN THREE YEARS LATE.

  5. Malorn February 2, 2016 at 5:38 am - Reply

    I fear these are a bit anti-british.  Sad, since otherwise they are fairly well balanced.  The sniping comments get a bit annoying, even to an American like myself.

  6. Brian Boatman February 2, 2016 at 5:38 am - Reply

    Hindsight from 1776 ( details below ) should have taught the  US government not to get involved in WW1 but instead of learning from hindsight,
    the US government created the dangerous conditions under which Nazism and Communism flourished in Europe after WW1 that eventually led to WW2 and the holocaust (details below).
    The US government did the equivalent of letting two killers loose ( Hitler and Stalin) and then blamed the killers for the subsequent killings without taking any responsibility for letting those killers loose in the first place ( details below ).
    According to historian Thomas Fleming, in his book "The Illusion of Victory: America in World War I" Fleming states :
      "Without the backing of American weaponry, munitions and loans, the Allies would have been forced to abandon their goal of the knockout blow.
     The war might have ended in 1915 or 1916 with a negotiated peace based on the mutual admission that the conflict had become a stalemate" (end of quote).

    In other words,  the Treaty of Versailles would not have existed if Germany had won and
    the only way Germany could have won is if the US government did not have a militant policy during WW1, that resulted in
    the US government arming the allies which made Germany an enemy when the US government refused to stop indirectly killing Germans by arming the allies and
     the US government refused to stop the starvation of the German people by not ending the blockade of Germany by the allies during WW1.
    During WW1,through the treaty of Brest-Litovsk, Germany was keeping Russia from becoming a world communist power but
     the defeat of Germany at the hands of the US government enabled Russia to break the treaty and then
     Russia went onto become a world communist power resulting in tens of millions dying under communism.

    In other words, WW1 beget
     WW2, the Zionist-Palestinian conflict, communist expansion and
     WW2 beget the Cold War and
     behind all the above wars and conflicts was the militant interventionist policies of the US government that beget war after war and conflict after conflict including the recent "war on terrorism".

    The US government was very much involved in WW1 from the very beginning, starting with
    American banks wanting to profit from the war by loaning money to the Allies  when the US government already knew from their 1776 hindsight that violence begets more violence
     ( example: 300 years of the cycle of violence between the British/US governments and Native Americans from 1622 through 1911   ).
    Highly decorated US Marine Corp Major General Smedley Butler states in his book titled " War is a Racket", that WW1 was all about the profit agenda of the warfare complex and their puppet politicians in the US government.

    Instead of making the profit agenda of the rich and powerful as their priority, hindsight should have taught the US government that a militant interventionist policy is not the answer to solving problems.
     Militant interventionist policies by the British resulted in hundreds of years of  terrorism from Native Americans and drawing from that experience (hindsight),
     the US government should not have had a  militant interventionist policy during WW1 which resulted in
    the destruction of the Ottoman Empire and the subsequent Zionist-Palestinian conflict,
    communists extending their power to become a world power and
    WW2 and the terrorism from Hitler since Hitler blamed the Jews for the defeat of Germany during WW1.

     "The core of Hitler's hatred of the Jews lies at the defeat of Germany in WW1," said historian and journalist Dr Joachim Riecker, "where Hitler blamed the Jews for the defeat of Germany, the collapse of the monarchy and the ruination of millions".
     In the book titled 'November 9: How World War One Led to the Holocaust', the historian Dr Joachim Riecker examines the speeches both public and private of Hitler to try to solve the riddle of how a dictator could morph into the industrial-scale murderer of an entire people.

    The entire discussion below will show that the violence of war is not the answer to the profit driven motives of the short sighted, militant US government because
     war begets war and in the case of the US government winning WW1, the consequence of that victory in turn beget WW2 and the resulting tragedy of the holocaust.

     For non-interventionist policies as a much better alternative to a profit driven war, read the end of this post for the link to non-interventionist policies.

     According to a comrade, Hans Mend, Hitler was in depression during WW1 and would leap up, and running about excitedly, say that "in spite of our big guns, victory would be denied us, for the invisible foes (Jews) of the German people were a greater danger than the biggest cannon of the enemy" (end of quote ).

     WW1 put Hitler in the hospital due to a bomb shrapnel and Hitler recalled in 1941 how WW1 made him enter politics as he wrote ""I brought back home with me my experiences at the (WW1) front; out of them I built my National Socialist community."

    After hearing about Germany's defeat in WW1 at the hands of the US government  and the subsequent Treaty of Versailles,  Hitler said,
    "When I was confined to bed, the idea came to me that I would liberate Germany, that I would make it great. I knew immediately that it would be realized" (end of quote ).

    Hitler gained popularity for his rowdy polemic speeches against the Treaty of Versailles.

    In a speech to the Reichstag on 17 May 1933, Adolf Hitler denounced the Treaty of Versailles because, in part, it had imposed such large reparations payments as to leave Germany in economic shambles.

    Hitler entered politics in order to exploit the cruel attributes of the Treaty of Versailles to his advantage while, Hitler blamed the Jews for Germany's defeat during WW1.
    The holocaust happened due to WW2 and
     WW2 happened due to Britain declaring war on Germany and
     the declaration of war on Germany was due to Germany's invasion of Poland and
    Germany's invasion of Poland was due to Hitler wanting to prevent the persecution of German Poles at the hands of the Poles.
     Hitler warned the allies that if another war was declared on Germany, the Jews would pay (since Hitler blamed the Jews for Germany's defeat during WW1 )
    and that is how the holocaust happened due to Britain declaring war on Germany and
    if Britain had not declared war on Germany there would not have been a holocaust and
     Hitler would have continued with The Haavara Agreement that was designed to help facilitate the emigration of German Jews to Palestine.

    How did the US government defeat Germany during WW1 ?
    Since Britain ran out of money,
     the U.S. government extended cash and supplies to its European allies, expending more than $7 billion in US government funds,
     way before the entry of the US government into WW1 while
    supporting the blockade of Germany by the Allies that was starving the German people.

     Before the US government appeared on the scene, the Allies were in a stalemate (trench warfare ) with Germany even though
     the US government was supplying military equipment to the Allies and Germany was fighting a two front war with Russia and the Allies and
    even then,
     Germany was  still able to defeat Russia during WW1 which resulted in the treaty of Brest-Litovsk and
     the Treaty had the effect of preventing communism from becoming a world power until
     the US government made the Treaty void, enabling Russia to become a world communist power.
     
    We would not have heard about Hitler if the US government did not have a militant interventionist policy during WW1 which resulted in
     Germany losing to the US government's million man military and
    the subsequent Treaty of Versailles which created the dangerous conditions under which Hitler rose to power.

    Should the US government be held responsible for Hitler's rise to power ?
    Would you blame the person for letting a tiger out of its cage, so similarly,
    the US government helped Hitler and Stalin by creating the dangerous conditions for Nazism and Communism to flourish as the result of
     the US government's one million man personnel defeating Germany during WW1.

    If Germany had won WW1, the following would have happened:
    (1) Germany restraining Russia (through the treaty of Brest-Litovsk) from becoming a world communist power.
    (2) Hitler stating his injuries that landed him in hospital during WW1 was worth it.
     (3) No Treaty of Versailles.
      (4) Hitler not hating the Treaty of Versailles because the Treaty would not have existed.
     (5) Hitler not hating his own government because he would have thought of his government as honorable for winning WW1.
     (6) Hitler not hating the Jews for Germany losing WW1 if Germany had actually won WW1.
     In other words, if Germany was triumphant after WW1, Hitler would not have had the motivation to enter politics and
     even if Hitler did enter politics in the midst of a triumphant Germany,
    winning WW1 would have put Germany in a much better political position to deal with Hitler while
     Hitler who tried to overthrow the German government for losing WW1 would not have had the motivation to overthrow the German government if
     the German government had actually won WW1.
    At the same time, even if Hitler did gain power in a triumphant Germany that won WW1, Hitler would have continued the policies of previous governments in Europe in treating Jews as second class citizens and
     no holocaust or the expulsion of Jews would have happened.

     SO THE ONLY CONCLUSION ONE CAN DRAW IS:
     The US government's short sighted, profit driven militant interventionist policies during WW1 created the dangerous conditions under which
     Nazism and Communism flourished in Europe after WW1 that eventually led to WW2 and the holocaust.

    FOR NON-MILITANT INTERVENTIONIST POLICIES AS A MUCH BETTER ALTERNATIVE TO PROFIT DRIVEN WARS OR CONFLICTS,
     
     READ PART SIX OF THE BLOG BELOW.
    COPY AND PASTE THE FOLLOWING INTO YOUR GOOGLE SEARCH BOX :
    " BRIAN BOATMAN PART ONE : 911 ATTACKS COULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED "

  7. Brian Boatman February 2, 2016 at 5:38 am - Reply

    War is about sacrificing the lives of the innocent,
     the destitute,
     the poor,
    the sick,
     the hungry,
     the elderly,
     the handicapped,
     the children and
     the babies through
     collateral damage for the so-called "greater good" which always involves
    not national security but rather
    financial security for the owners of the warfare complex who "laugh all the way to the bank" as stated by
     highly decorated US Marine Corp Major General Smedley Butler in his book titled " War Is a Racket" and
     while the puppet politicians of the warfare complex send the poor and powerless deliberately into harm's way,
     our vulnerable soldiers seeing the immense suffering of the innocent,
     seeing the innocent being maimed,
     deformed,
     paralyzed and being fed through a tube for life,
     blinded or
     disfigured for life due to collateral damage,
     seeing the horror of war, our vulnerable soldiers end up devastating their families by committing suicide by the thousands.
     Over 8000 veterans commit suicide every year on average ( almost one tragic suicide every hour and on average 22 tragic suicides daily )
     while the Swiss live in peace without enemies due to the Swiss non-militant interventionist policies.
     FOR NON-MILITANT INTERVENTIONIST POLICIES AS A MUCH BETTER ALTERNATIVE TO PROFIT DRIVEN WARS,
     COPY AND PASTE THE FOLLOWING IN YOUR GOOGLE SEARCH BOX :
     "BRIAN BOATMAN PART ONE 911 ATTACKS COULD HAVE BEEN PREVENTED"

  8. William Moore February 2, 2016 at 5:38 am - Reply

    Full of errors.  Whoever edited the script should be assigned to a punishment battalion.

  9. ANDREW OLIVER SATCHELL February 2, 2016 at 5:38 am - Reply

    COLOUR

  10. Melanie Hamilton February 2, 2016 at 5:38 am - Reply

    Okay, the ME-109 was a good fighter plane. My only question is why, if it was so superior, Adolf Galland, one of Germany's top aces, answered "Spitfires!" when asked by Goering what he needed to defeat the RAF in the Battle of Britain. As I recall, Galland explained that tighter turning ability and better all around agility had a great deal to do with it.

  11. ? sikistisik February 2, 2016 at 5:38 am - Reply

    the PUNS are strong

Leave A Response »

SENGTOTO
SENGTOTO
LOGIN EVOSTOSO
DAFTAR EVOSTOTO
jebol togel
mikatoto
Slot Gacor
mikatoto