Benghazi buzz: Obama predicted to leave office


To this day, it is not known what role President Richard Nixon played in the break-in at the Watergate Hotel, but the tape recordings from the White House confirm he and Chief of Staff H.R. Haldeman discussed using the CIA to slow down the FBI investigation.

It was the cover-up, as history records, that eventually brought about Nixon’s resignation in disgrace.

Benghazi buzz Obama predicted to leave office

Now, Congress is investigating an alleged cover-up of the terrorist attack Sept. 11, 2012, on the U.S. foreign service facility in Benghazi, Libya, amid predictions from prominent voices that the scandal will bring down the Obama administration.

Former Arkansas governor and onetime presidential candidate Mike Huckabee made the bold prediction this week, ahead of a House hearing Wednesday that will feature witnesses of the attack.

“I believe that before it’s all over, this president will not fill out his full term,” he said. “I know that puts me on a limb. But this is not minor. It wasn’t minor when Richard Nixon lied to the American people and worked with those in his administration to cover up what really happened in Watergate.

“But, I remind you – as bad as Watergate was, because it broke the trust between the president and the people, no one died. This is more serious because four Americans did in fact die.”

Meanwhile, John Bolton, former U.N. ambassador and now a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, has also declared the Benghazi scandal could lead to Obama’s removal from office.

“This could be the hinge point,” he told Newsmax. “It’s that serious for them.”

Frank Gaffney, the president of the Center for Security Policy, wrote in a Washington Times column that “the dam seems to be breaking on the nearly eight-month-long cover-up concerning the deadly jihadist attack on Americans and their facilities in Benghazi, Libya.”

After the foreign service facility in Benghazi was attacked, the Obama administration initially claimed Muslims spontaneously rioted over a little-known online video that defamed Islam’s founder.

But now there is evidence that the administration knew from the beginning that it was a terrorist attack and altered its talking points.

The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is digging into the truth, holding a hearing that calls on those who were in Benghazi to explain what happened.

The questions will probe who created the story that was delivered to America and why.

Hear Huckabee:

Critics have asserted that in the heat of the presidential election race, Obama, who had been campaigning on the claim that al-Qaida essentially were defeated, was unwilling to provide ammunition to his GOP critics by confirming such a brazen terror attack on America, particularly on the anniversary of 9/11.

The witnesses include State Department career worker Gregory Hicks, who already has provided sworn testimony that American resources were told to “stand down” that day while four Americans died.

That statement would directly conflict with multiple statements by the Obama administration.

Rep. Darrell Issa, D-Calif., pointed out that the Obama administration specifically denied that anyone was told to stand down.

The Washington Post also reported that U.S. Embassy officials in Tripoli, some 600 miles away, tried unsuccessfully to get the Pentagon to scramble fighter jets in a show of force. The embassy also was unable to get permission to deploy four U.S. Special Operations troops in Benghazi during the attack.

Congressional investigators released a partial transcript of Hicks’ coming testimony. It includes his report that the lieutenant colonel in Tripoli who commanded the Special Operations team told him he was sorry that his men had been held back.

Hicks said he received communication from Stevens, saying, “Greg, we’re under attack.”

In an interview with the Fox News Channel, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, said getting the information is going to be a chore.

“There are people who want to testify that have been suppressed,” he said, according to the Washington Times.  “They’re scared to death of what the State Department is doing with them.”

Hillary Clinton, who was secretary of state at the time of the attack, has a huge stake in the outcome of the investigation, as she is considered the favorite for the 2016 Democratic Party nomination for president.

She famously unleashed an emotional outburst at an earlier hearing on Benghazi, dismissing questions about the reason for the attack with, “What difference does it make?”

Chaffetz expressed little confidence in what Obama and Clinton have told the public.

“We were certainly misled at every step of the way,” Chaffetz said.

In his Washington Times column, Gaffney noted the combination of congressional hearings along with reports that “long-silenced witnesses are determined to reveal what they know.

“At the instigation of Rep. Frank R. Wolf, Virginia Republican, and with encouragement from more than 700 special operations veterans and family members of those lost in Benghazi, some 135 legislators in the House of Representatives and three U.S. senators are calling for a special investigatory committee,” he wrote. “To be sure, Team Obama seems as determined as ever to defy efforts to ferret out the truth about Benghazi. In this, they have been aided by the failure of Congress to date to mount a single, concerted investigation of what led up to, happened during and took place after the attack.”

Gaffney wrote that it’s critical to know the truth about where Obama was during the attack and what was he doing.

“He evidently did not order a rescue operation,” he said. ” … We need to know why not, and what the president was doing instead of his first responsibility: protecting Americans.”

Gaffney said there are also questions about Hillary Clinton’s role, particularly why she failed “to intervene on behalf of her subordinates in harm’s way.”

Huckabee acknowledged that if Democrats continue to control the U.S. Senate, nothing will happen.

“They won’t let it happen, not because they’re protecting just the president, they’re trying to protect their entire political party. If they try to protect the president and their party, and do so at the expense of the truth, their president and their party will go down. Now, here’s what I’m going to suggest will happen – as the information and facts begin to come out, it will become so obvious that there was a concerted and very, very deliberate attempt to mislead this country and its people to lie to Congress, as well as to you.”

Huckabee continued: “When a president lies to the American people and is part of a cover-up, he cannot continue to govern. And as the facts come out, I think we’re going to see something startling. And before it’s over, I don’t think this president will finish his term unless somehow they can delay it in Congress past the next three and a half years.”

Retired Lt. Gen. Jerry Boykin, once commander of missions for the Army Rangers and now executive vice president for the Family Research Council, said the truth needs to come out about Benghazi.

In an interview published by WND, he said there has been no acceptable explanation for not rescuing Americans under siege in Benghazi, and nothing less than a special House committee investigation will satisfy him.

He said the lack of answers since has been bothering him for months, and that’s why he worked on a letter to Congress.

“I’ve been working this since not long after the events on the 11th of September. That said, the U.S. Congress has been sort of ignoring all of our efforts to try and get some full accounting on this thing,” Boykin said. “I just simply reached out to some people that I knew had a deep passion for this, that would in fact bring a different dimension to it and that’s the retired special operations guys that spent a good portion of their professional careers preparing for and executing these kinds of operations. They’ve risked their lives for this. They’ve seen people that have sacrificed their lives to save other Americans, and I knew these people would come on quickly and would come on with deep passion.”

The letter to the House of Representatives called for the creation of an investigative committee. It was signed by hundreds of members of the military.

Boykin said what’s baffling is why there was no attempt to rescue the Americans.

“Why was there no attempt to recover the bodies before they fell into the hands of the Libyans? We find that perplexing and inexcusable that we don’t have those answers,” he said.

Issa’s committee praised Mark Thompson, acting deputy assistant secretary for counter-terrorism; Hicks; and Eric Nordstrom, diplomatic security officer; for agreeing to testify.

The committee’s analysis indicates Clinton cut her own department’s counter-terrorism unit out of the situation, and a source reported the U.S. military could have reached Benghazi in time to save lives.

It’s not the first time talk of of impeaching Obama has come up.

Lawmakers who have broached the subject of impeachment include Reps. Trent Franks, R-Ariz.; Walter Jones, R-N.C.; Trey Radel, R-Fla.; and Steve Stockman. Others include former Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas; former Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio; former assistant U.S. attorney Andrew McCarthy; left-leaning investigative reporter Dave Lindorff; talk-radio host Mark Levin; former House Speaker and presidential candidate Newt Gingrich; and author and columnist Pat Buchanan.

Article II, Section 4, of the U.S. Constitution states, “The President, Vice President and all civil officers of the United States, shall be removed from office on impeachment for, and conviction of, treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors.”

The U.S. House of Representatives has the power to commence impeachment proceedings. If the House adopts an impeachment resolution, the U.S. Senate conducts a trial and determines whether to convict or acquit. If an official is convicted, he or she is removed from the position and may be barred from holding office again. The official may also face criminal prosecution.

Only two U.S. presidents have been impeached by the House: Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton. However, both presidents were acquitted in the Senate. Nixon resigned before the full House voted on his impeachment.

Besides the Benghazi disaster, issues that have prompted the impeachment discussions include Obama’s Fast and Furious gun-running scandal, his decision to order the assassination of an American-born Muslim cleric who joined al-Qaida, his “recess appointments” to the National Labor Relations Board even though Congress was not in recess, his appointment of many unvetted “czars,” his fight against enforcing immigration laws, amnesty, U.S. involvement in Libya and gun control.

Specifically on Benghazi, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney accused an anti-Muslim video on YouTube of inciting the attack. On Sept. 16, U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice made five Sunday morning television appearances in which she claimed the attacks were spontaneous reactions to the obscure film. Obama mentioned the YouTube video six more times at the U.N. on Sept. 25.

However, there was never any kind of protest at the Benghazi compound that night.

WND also reported a March poll showed advocates for impeachment nearly equal to those against it. For example, regarding Obama’s campaign for amnesty to illegals, 44 percent said he should be impeached for it, while only 48 percent say he should not. And 46 percent said Obama should be impeached for launching the war to remove Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, while 49 percent said no.

“Taken by itself, any of these questions about President Obama could be ignored, but it becomes much more questionable when all of these … administration actions are taken as a whole,” said Fritz Wenzel, whose public opinion and media consulting company Wenzel Strategies conducted the poll.

“Obama appears to have found a way to split the nation directly down the middle on each issue, but, as his plummeting poll numbers may now indicate, the American public may well be catching up with the cumulative effect of this administration’s handling of the Constitution and the federal government,” Wenzel said.

Sign the petition urging Congress to impeach Obama.

Another recent call for impeachment came from rock legend and gun-rights defender Ted Nugent.

“There’s no question that this guy’s violations qualify for impeachment,” he said. “There’s no question.”

He blasted “the criminality of this government, the unprecedented abuse of power, corruption, fraud and deceit by the Chicago gangster-scammer-ACORN-in-chief.”


Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

33 Responses

  1. Leo says:

    Let me try this link yet again about Obama giving our sensitive missile technology to the Russians .

    • 5 War Veteran says:

      JFK was assasinated for considering something similar regarding the Space program. Could we be lucky enough to have history repeat itself?

      • Leo says:

        Was thinking along the same line , similarities between Obama and Kennedy, The Military is upset with Obama like the military was upset with Kennedy, just in different ways . A call could come in, a order could be given, nothing on paper . this clip is a work of fiction but then sometimes truth can be stranger than Fiction .

  2. Leo says:

  3. Leo says:

    Would Someone within the military please organize a military Coupd’etat for our Communist Commander and chief . Better yet why dosen’t this socialist just give our ICBM launch codes to the Russians as well . come to think of it the Russians as well as the Chinese probably already have them . tell me would the Russians or Chinese give sensitive classified missile technology to the United States ? NO . what was it that Obama stated to then Russian President Medvedev in 2012 during their meeting over a unknowingly open microphone about more flexibility over missile defense in his second term ? more than likely this and much much more

  4. 2nite says:

    Where is my previous comment? Are you censoring comments?

  5. avid says:

    Dream on suckers !!

    • Leo says:

      NO, the sucker is in the white house, everyone that knows anything about Obama knows he is Homosexual and had one of his suck buddies murdered that must going to come forward with the truth about Obama .

      • Archie1954 says:

        Shame on you repeating these terrible lies!

        • Leo says:

          That is a fact Jack, Look it up

        • 5 War Veteran says:

          There you go again Archie, for a person who has no vested interest in America, you sure do seem to support Obama. It is a well known fact that Barry O is a homosexual. It is also a fact that Obama was never vetted, had he been perhaps he would not have become president. Since he was planned to become president anyway just as they all have been since JFK.

          Is Obama gay? When I first heard a few months ago that Obama might be gay, my initial reaction was, that’s ridiculous. He’s married, has two kids, and he’s never set off my gaydar. I had read a few years ago about Larry Sinclair, who claimed he had given Obama oral sex when Obama was a state senator. But at the time I just figured that any famous person is bound to attract a few loonies who will say anything to get publicity.

          But after I read an article I started researching more about Obama’s gayness, and after a while, it just made too much sense not to be true.

          In his article in, Jerome Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D. in political science, said that Obama (along with Rahm Emanuel) was a lifetime member of Man’s Country, a gay bathhouse in Chicago. Obama was evidently well known there and many of the older clientele remembered him:

          Investigative journalist Wayne Madsen, who worked with the National Security Agency from 1984 to 1988 as a Navy intelligence analyst, confirmed DuJan’s claims.

          “It is common knowledge in the Chicago gay community that Obama actively visited the gay bars and bathhouses in Chicago while he was an Illinois state senator,” Madsen told WND.

          Obama’s reputation in gay circles, by the way, was that he liked to receive oral sex but not to give it, which squares with what Larry Sinclair had said about him. (It’s his “signature.” And receiving blow jobs but not giving them would be consistent with Obama’s narcissistic personality.)

          As a member of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity Baptist Church, Obama was known to have a close friendship with Donald Young, the openly gay choir director of the church. Young was murdered execution-style on December 23, 2007, just as Obama began his climb toward the Presidency. Another gay member of the church, Larry Bland, had also been killed execution-style a month earlier. Both cases remain unsolved. Donald Young’s mother believes to this day that he was killed in order to silence him.

          Jerome Corsi, dismissed by the Left as a “Tea Party activist and conspiracy theorist.” But even if you regard Corsi and Madsen and Dujan with suspicion, what they say fits the larger picture of Obama’s life far better than a heterosexual narrative would. The circumstantial evidence — away from his public image as a family man — fits the homosexual narrative perfectly.

          There is virtually no record of Obama having had any girlfriends before he married Michelle at age 28. He referred to two in his autobiography, but these were later revealed to be “composites.” Are we to believe that a healthy sports-oriented young black man had no record of having chased after girls during his youth? You’d think that after he’d first been elected as President, when he was seen in such a messianic light, all sorts of women would have come forward claiming past flings. But none did.

          In his autobiography, Obama stated that during his years at Columbia he spent all his time in the library and “lived like a monk.” But if he spent all of his time in the library, he should have gotten excellent grades, especially given how smart he is supposed to be. Then why spend 3 million dollars hiring 11 lawyers to make sure his academic records were permanently sealed? It’s also hard to believe that a young man who by his own admission freely imbibed drugs was otherwise inclined to live like a monk.

          Another question: how many successful black men marry women far darker than themselves? If successful black men do marry black, it’s often a woman so light-skinned you have to look twice to ascertain her blackness. This tends to be true of successful blacks in business, in entertainment, and in sports. Obama wasn’t rich when he married Michelle, but he was a Harvard Law School graduate and did give the impression of an ambitious young man on his way up. And politically ambitious young gay men care more about beards than desirable females.

          Michelle, in turn, married Barack out of ambition. She reportedly had divorce papers drawn up after he lost an election to Bobby Rush for a House seat in 2000.

          When Barack was first elected President, Michelle wanted to stay in Chicago and raise their two girls there. She was quickly informed that this would not look good, so she moved to the White House.

          Has a President’s “body man” ever been given such prominence? Part of Reggie Love’s job as Obama’s personal valet was to “wake the President up in the morning.” (How could he do this without waking Michelle up at the same time?) Love reportedly worked up to 18 hours a day, “often sleeping on the burgundy couch.”

          The “body man” before Love was Nick Colvin, who left the White House after rumors surfaced that he had had sexual relations with Obama while Obama was a state senator. (Obama hasn’t had just one Clyde Tolson, he’s had two.)

          And why all the snickering when Kal Penn (“Kumar” of Harold and Kumar fame, widely known to be gay in Hollywood) was working in the White House as the President’s Associate director in the White House Office of Public Engagement? Google “Kal Penn Obama affair” and you’ll get 165,000 results.

          The ways in which Obama tries to compensate are telling too. His jaunty stride up to the podium is meant to project virility; and his vocal delivery, with that faux vaguely-black accent, is meant to show manliness as well. Other gay guys who try too hard to appear manly, with overly emphatic movements, and it usually leaves the opposite impression.

          You never, ever hear any whispers about Obama and women. Sure, there are stories about power struggles between Michelle and other women, like Oprah Winfrey and Desiree Rogers; but no stories about Barack straying with other women. I had always just assumed that this was because he was a squeaky clean family man who was perhaps a little scared of Michelle. But for a healthy man who ascended to the Presidency at age 48, who had unheard of star power and unlimited access to women if he wanted them to never, ever indulge? That would be practically unheard of. But no, there will be no Monicas for Barack.

          Obama has essentially been hiding his sexuality in plain sight all this time. In retrospect, I’m astonished at my own blindness. (There has been chatter about his sexuality on the internet for years.) But he just never set off my gaydar. And after all, he is the President of the United States, which is not a position we generally associate with gayness, any more than, say, Army General.

          In a way, it’s almost racist not to see Obama’s gayness. Sometimes it’s hard to see past the blackness: white Americans do have a tendency to assume all black males are high testosterone potential rapists.

          Obama also has none of the sheepishness, or sense of furtiveness that we sometimes associate with gays. But maybe he doesn’t give off that vibe because his narcissism overrides any possible sense of embarrassment.

          With Obama, his duplicity about his sexuality is reflective of his duplicity about practically everything else. He has employed Alinsky-ite methods to hide his gayness the same way he has employed them to hide his far left political leanings.

          At this point, more than four years into Obama’s Presidency, his sexuality has to be open secret in Washington. The White House press certainly knew about JFK’s escapades with women at the time, but kept them quiet. They are undoubtedly performing a similar function with Obama.

          (By the way, if you don’t believe that Obama is gay, go ahead and laugh at me. But the truth should become much more widely known after Obama has left the Presidency, when the press no longer has a reason to protect him.)

          You have to wonder whose idea of a joke it was when Newsweek put out that famous cover of him with the multicolored halo over his head and titled it, “Our first gay President.” (In fact, Obama is the second; James Buchanan was undoubtedly gay as well.)

          While I don’t blame Obama’s for his sexuality, I do hold it against him that he’s such a con man and narcissist. He’s also obviously out of his depth as President, and his rigidly leftist mindset precludes any realistic ideas about how to kickstart the economy, or even of how the world works, for that matter.

          They say there is a root of truth in every myth, however I do not think that holds true in regards to Barry O becoming known as a “good president”.

  6. 5 War Veteran says:

    One other thing pertaining to the Obama White House …. Scary …

    While I do not support the Muslim Brotherhood I also do not support the criminal Zionists that run the planet and ruin the planet.

  7. 5 War Veteran says:

    Seeing Obama gone is a fantasy and who would replace him? Certainly not Zion Joe Biden! I would much prefer Mike Huckabee any day over any of the other Zionists available.

    The majority of them are criminals.

  8. 2nite says:

    I believe the entire Benghazi event was a deliberate plan by our own government/Mossad forces to eliminate the ambassador and others who were gun running for the U.S. But someone was going to blow the whistle, therefore he/they had to be killed. The documents and computer hard drives that were taken in this “attack” are evident of a major cover-up. We are exchanging one lie (the video) for another lie (terrorist attack), in my opinion. The truth is not to be found anywhere within this government administration!

  9. Rilke says:

    Exactly the opposite will happen. Obama’s far more cunning than people are prepared to admit, and it will cost us if our eyes are closed to this. Obama is deflecting blame for Benghazi to Hillary Clinton — who as it happens presents the biggest challenge to Obama’s real goal of using false flags and fixed ballots to get ‘elected’ to a THIRD term. (what’s that you say? A third term is unconstitutional? So is being president at all, for a non-citizen).

    Remember, not a single Senator OR Representative dared to stand up on January 6 and challenge the countries irregularities which plagued the 2012 election. They talk a good game with their public faces, but behind closed doors they are all one club, pre approved by the same control freak puppet masters who run the media, the banks, and companies like Monsanto with its genetically modified food push.

    • 5 War Veteran says:

      Obama was not vetted and when this was admitted by Congress they failed to so exactly that. Vett him.
      Remember the old joke about the Pope being polish? ‘”when he needed to go to the bathroom he made a wrong turn onto the balcony, to save fact the Vatican let him become Pope,”

      The Congress is complicit in the sham/scam. They cannot be trusted period. Allowing an illegal to become president is TREASON. Failing to act on tonnes of evidence is dereliction of duty. Complicity. Obama believes he is above the people. He is a sociopath amongst sociopaths.

      Obama will become the “sacrificial lamb” soon enough as the Elite sacrifice him to the people to cover up and hide behind their complicity. Obama is a Muslim, we all know that. The Elite Zionists want all Muslims dead (more than white goys) as they have been saying so for more than 40 years.

      The Elite turn on themselves when their is profit to be had (ever wonder the meaning behind the Star Trek Ferengi personalities) in plain sight.

      Why isn’t this “common knowledge”? IT IS only most people failed to pay attention. NASCAR and celebrities (handled and owned by the elite) are more important than paying attention to the undermining of the American economy and the selling of Americans into slavery. Why else glorify Snookie and the Kardashians? How about the glorification of “reality shows” like “deep South Paranormal” and “Duck Dynasty”? Gotta love the “Turtleman” and who can forget “New Jersey Shore”

      Ever notice how New Jersey is imploding, losing it’s constitutional rights to Zionist elite politicians? Soon it will be illegal to say “gun” in New Jersey, just like it is an expelling offense in many “No Tolerance” zones where children are suspended for suggesting “Bubble Gun fights”.

      • Archie1954 says:

        Holy cow, what a load of garbage!

      • Leo says:

        @Five star vetern that video is dead on .

        • 5 War Veteran says:

          Holy cow, what a load of garbage!

          It is interesting that you would call evidence out of the horses mouths a load of garbage? You deny your own eyes as well as the supportive data simply because you do not agree with it? Isn’t that hypocrisy? Have you read the Torah or the Talmud. Here look this one up:

          Metzitzah b’peh

          I hope it gives you a clean taste in your mouth. Remember these are the people you are supporting.

  10. Ltpar says:

    Somebody had better be rechecking their crystal ball or tea leaves if they seriously think Barack Obama will ever resign willingly, regardless of the event. The far left liberals and powers behind the scene have been waiting 50 years to get a radical like Obama in place and will not give up without blood flowing in the streets. Wake up and smell the java folks, we dropped the ball big time and now these people are solidly in control of the government. End result is the Republicans will finish up their hearings, Obama, the State Department, CIA and Department of Defense will be showed up as being the incompetent bunch they are and then business will continue in Washington as usual. By the time Hillary Clinton gets around to announcing her run for President, the gullible American voters will have forgotten all about Benghazi and the men who died there. Such is the sorry state of our country and the future only looks worse.

  11. Arcchie1954 says:

    There was no coverup and this making a mountain out of a molehill is pure political theater. It really bothers me that the Republicans have no time to carry out the nation’s business but plenty of time to play their foolish games! The Party of No is just enjoying their perks without earning them through diligent attention to legislation.

    • 5 War Veteran says:

      This is the Troll evidence. You say you are not an American and do not live in America. Then you say this? “No Cover up” have you read the Watergate papers? Of course not.
      The evidence arises that you are just here to create hate and discontent.

      In Internet slang, a troll (pron.: /ˈtroʊl/, /ˈtrɒl/) is someone who posts inflammatory,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as a forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response[2] or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.[3] The noun troll may also refer to the provocative message itself, as in: “That was an excellent troll you posted.”

      While the word troll and its associated verb trolling are associated with Internet discourse, media attention in recent years has made such labels subjective, with trolling describing intentionally provocative actions and harassment outside of an online context.

      • Archie1954 says:

        Only right wing extremist conspiracists are going to believe such tom foolery as a cover up. The President is up to his neck in the nation’s problems and doesn’t have time, like the Republican,s to be involved in so called cover ups.

        • 5 War Veteran says:

          Keep it going Archie, you have no value here.

          • Archie1954 says:

            I intend to continue ruining your right wing foolish lovefest!

          • 5 War Veteran says:

            I intend to continue ruining your right wing foolish lovefest!

            Go right ahead Archie, this will be fun. I will provide facts with supporting links and you can compete and try to provide whatever it is that trolls provide. You see Archie there is no competition here.
            You can compete all you want. But you cannot dispute facts. Facts prove themselves.
            And PLEASE back up what you “say”, your “opinions”, with something of value otherwise it is only opinion and without proof, again are meaningless. You know like I try to do most times. When necessary. I also appreciate people who actually ask questions.

            I have been a full time researcher for 17 years now. I do this every day. This will be so much fun!

          • Archie1954 says:

            Wow 5 war, seventeen years of picking and choosing your right wing extremist information and discarding the truth. Yes, I would say you’re well versed in presenting lies as truth. But that only works on the braindead, your right wing audience so to speak! It doesn’t work on people who actually think.

          • 5 War Veteran says:

            Wow 5 war, seventeen years of picking and choosing your right wing extremist information and discarding the truth. Yes, I would say you’re well versed in presenting lies as truth. But that only works on the braindead, your right wing audience so to speak! It doesn’t work on people who actually think.

            Mo Archie, that is 17 years following 22 years as a Military Man with a high clearance who experienced things you will never know or understand. My experiences set me on a journey of discovery to find out the real answers. Your assumptions set you on a path to opinion and ignorance. Your assumption of my “right wing stance” sends you on a path of assumption and you are not open to truth even when it is presented with links to evidence. All of which you disregard because of you attitude that stands in the way of understanding and realization.
            Remember you are the one who claims “not to be an American” so your supporting the government party line and calling me names makes you a hypocrite of the highest order. however I am still willing to play your game. So stop calling names which are meaningless political labels spread around by politically correct deceptionists and lets get down to actual facts.
            As I have asked, please present facts supported by links that ALL the readers can follow to develop their own understanding.
            At the very least be a part of educating those who are interested. Leave opinions behind.

            Unless there is that slim possibility that you are afraid of the truth which of course would then prove you are a liar and actually an American disenchanted with the path things seem to be taking. Or a government employed desk jockey who is paid to spread hate and discontent on sites like these who try to reveal truth and educate the masses. In other words a plant.

            I do appreciate that you think I have an audience, I do not remotely think that I do. What is it that you have besides a poor attitude and irritating demeanor?

  12. Leo says:

    One other thing pertaining to the Obama White House …. Scary …

  13. Leo says:

    It was proven beyond any shadow of a doubt that Obama was not even a American citizen . even more so a legitimate American President yet still remains in office . I will believe his political assassination when I see images of him and Michelle Obama leaving the oval waving goodbye to the American . Remember what Nixon did . that famous wave .

  14. Truthmatters says:

    Dream on, this is not a normal man we are talking about. This is perhaps one of the most deranged self centered narcissistic sociopaths ever to hold this office. Does anyone believe an individual who meets that criteria will ever look at himself and say, yes I am responsible for the deaths of four Americans and I am derelict in my duty tyo protect all Americans? Nio way folks, This man literally has both his middle fingers raised to all of us and the American flag. He is a true Communist and as such his disposition is against us, our nation and especially our military. So dream on about the self absorbed king stepping down for anything at all. In fact he is emboldened because he knows we as Americans are weak and lazy and unpatriotic to our constitution. He knows this because we have allowed this government to become the largest ugliest monster ever conceived and you know what we did about it? NOTHING! NOTHING AT ALL. We are not deserving of the nation our forefathers handed us. NO folks, he stays and in fact he stays forever as king!

Leave a Reply

© 2013 Pakalert Press. All rights reserved.