July 12, 2009
A leading defence expert has projected that China will attack India by 2012 to divert the attention of its own people from “unprecedented” internal dissent, growing unemployment and financial problems that are threatening the hold of Communists in that country.
“China will launch an attack on India before 2012. There are multiple reasons for a desperate Beijing to teach India the final lesson, thereby ensuring Chinese supremacy in Asia in this century,” Bharat Verma, Editor of the Indian Defence Review, has said.
Verma said the recession has “shut the Chinese exports shop”, creating an “unprecedented internal social unrest” which in turn, was severely threatening the grip of the Communists over the society.
Among other reasons for this assessment were rising unemployment, flight of capital worth billions of dollars, depletion of its foreign exchange reserves and growing internal dissent, Verma said in an editorial in the forthcoming issue of the premier defence journal. In addition to this, “The growing irrelevance of Pakistan, their right hand that operates against India on their behest, is increasing the Chinese nervousness,” he said, adding that US President Barak Obama’s Af-Pak policy was primarily Pak-Af policy that has “intelligently set the thief to catch the thief”.
Verma said Beijing was “already rattled, with its proxy Pakistan now literally embroiled in a civil war, losing its sheen against India.” “Above all, it is worried over the growing alliance of India with the US and the West, because the alliance has the potential to create a technologically superior counterpoise.
“All these three concerns of Chinese Communists are best addressed by waging a war against pacifist India to achieve multiple strategic objectives,” he said.
While China “covertly allowed” North Korea to test underground nuclear explosion and carry out missile trials, it was also “increasing its naval presence in South China Sea to coerce into submission those opposing its claim on the Sprately Islands,” the defence expert said. He said it would be “unwise” at this point of time for a recession-hit China to move against the Western interests, including Japan.
“Therefore, the most attractive option is to attack a soft target like India and forcibly occupy its territory in the Northeast,” Verma said. But India is “least prepared” on ground to face the Chinese threat, he says and asks a series of questions on how will India respond to repulse the Chinese game plan or whether Indian leadership would be able to “take the heat of war”.
“Is Indian military equipped to face the two-front wars by Beijing and Islamabad? Is the Indian civil administration geared to meet the internal security challenges that the external actors will sponsor simultaneously through their doctrine of unrestricted warfare? “The answers are an unequivocal ‘no’. Pacifist India is not ready by a long shot either on the internal or the external front,” the defence journal editor says. In view of the “imminent threat” posed by China, “the quickest way to swing out of pacifism to a state of assertion is by injecting military thinking in the civil administration to build the sinews. That will enormously increase the deliverables on ground – from Lalgarh to Tawang,” he says.
Also See:
The coming war between India and China
China’s naval surveillance capabilities
China And The End Of Westernization
China’s Military Rise Means End of US Hegemony?
Time for US-NATO to Leave Central Asia
US Media Hides Indian Nuclear Scandal
Operation Blue Tulsi: How India Approached Israel For Help Against Pakistan
Irrefutable Evidence: Israel, India Fomenting Trouble In Pakistan
Why Pakistan Will Never Catch Terror Leader Alive
Project 2012: Predictions Coming True? Nuclear War Begins Soon? Updated
Assalam O Alykum
Who-Should-be-The-President-of-Pakistan
Im inclosing two interviews of two great anchors of Pakistan.
Please view both interviews and think who best can serve Pakistan?
We have seen how matters and conditions are with most of the leaders of Pakistan from the different political parties and the backgrounds.
The two leaders of Pakistan in two videos are;
Janab Parvez Mushariff and Janab Zaid Hamid
Both are without any conclusive political parties neither they have any political backgrounds.
We have come to know Janab Parvez Mushariff in some great details and lived the eight years of his some good, some bad and some confusing ruling times. Over all wasnt that bad.
We have not yet seen this remarkable anchor Janab Zaid Hamid in any ruling role, however we have come to know him enough to know; there will be no one better than him to serve the constitution of Pakistan; how its meant to and suppose to be served.
I have chosen these two leaders of our times, out of all those out there based on a simple criterion:
Should we try old and tested Janab Parvez Mushariff once more time?
Or
Should we try the young and new Janab Zaid Hamid first ever time?
Both interviews of both leaders in differnet videos suggests the honesty, wisdom, fearlessness, total control, fairness and both has can do attitudes, which is the most important ingredient and the measurement of any vibrant and the strong multidimensional leadership.
Also must remember, when you give your votes dont give votes because someone looks good, or can talk good, or has an international standing. We want a competent, viable, intelligent, visionary, brave, outstanding decision maker, who can lead from the front as a leader for Pakistan.
Also must remember, the candidate of the presidency must be independent, partial, neutral and must not belong to any pressure group, political party or to any lobby group.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrMs60koMCo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8gFH7oRm7CY
Cast your vote now:
http://pakalert.wordpress.com/2009/09/11/pakalert-poll-who-should-be-the-president-of-pakistan/
Please forward this mail to others so they also can cast their votes too. Help build strong Pakistan!
Any suggestions will be well come :))
JazakAllah
Pakistan Zindabad