On October 2, NASA’s SOlar Heliospheric Observatory (SOHO) captured footage of a bright comet impacting with the Sun, followed by a coronal mass ejection (CME).
NASA’s statement that, “While it looks to the casual observer that the comet triggered the ejection, the apparent relationship between an incoming comet and a CME is only a coincidence.”
Present-day proponents of the Electric Model of the Universe would disagree.
The Electric Model of the Universe (or Plasma Cosmology) highlights the importance of electricity throughout the Universe. They say, “Gravity attracts. But only the electric force can repulse huge masses in jets, solar wind, eruptions. It also forms matter to filaments. Filaments and jets are in the fifth state of matter which can be by orders more energetic than plasma.”
NASA argues that there had been several CMEs earlier that day — but any previous CMEs on October 2 would not contradict the Electric Model, at all.
NASA acknowledges the work of plasma cosmologists, such as Hannes Alfvn, Wal Thornhill and David Talbott but they say, “Nothing has yet come out of these efforts.” However, the more forward-thinking Los Alamos National Labs website states that, “Alfvn’s theories in astrophysics and plasma physics have usually gained acceptance only two or three decades after their publication.”
More Information:
www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/news/comet-cme.html
www.holoscience.com
public.lanl.gov/alp/plasma/people/alfven.html
Thoretical arguments have their place in physics but what I want to know is the everyday effect of such arguments being true.