Gaddafi Is Dead – Long Live The New World Order


By Kevin

After several months of heavy fighting, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi is dead, he has been captured and killed following the fall of his home town of Sirte to Libyan revolutionary NTC forces.

Sorry let me rephrase that statement –

After several months of heavy  fighting, bombing and slaughter and destruction, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi is dead, he has been captured and murdered without trial following the fall of his home town of Sirte to Libyan revolutionary NTC forces, who in-turn were directed, funded and supported by the New World Order and their puppets, Barack Obama, David Cameron and Nicolas Sarkozy.

Now something tells me that headline will not be seen on any press report from the mainstream media!

Now onto the mainstream media and The Telegraph reported his demise as such:

Gaddafi cornered and killed by revolutionary forces Dictator captured in sewer after Nato strike • ‘Executed‘ with bullet to head • Pictures and video showing last moments


Sounds like an intro to a new Quentin Tarantino movie release! Will they provide popcorn and Cola at the video screening I ask myself?

And now onto the British Bullshit Corporation also known by the friendly and cuddly term the BBC:

Libya’s ex-leader Col Muammar Gaddafi has been killed after an assault on his birthplace of Sirte, officials say.

Much more modest and easier to digest by the large percentage of the British public who believed all the lies and hype spewed out by the UK government propaganda machine and their New World Order masters and backed up by their mainstream media lackeys (Def: someone who does menial tasks or runs errands for another).

This is the exact same public of this once “great” country who did not even bat an eyelid at the financial cost let alone the humanitarian one, of the so called “No Fly Zone” which was announced only a few weeks after a series of austerity measures were introduced by same said government due to the amount of debt the country is in! And what was the UK governments answer to the few raised voices of concern and disdain? “We have a contingency fund” for “killing people“, sorry scratch that “for emergencies such as this” apologies I must learn to stop translating government propaganda into the truth. Bad Kevin!

British Foreign Secretary William Hague said, he was very “pleased“ Gaddafi had been “removed“. Don’t you mean murdered without trial Mr Hague? Yes thats right wasn’t that the aim of the mission in the first place? Remember this little spat way back in March:

Yesterday a war of words erupted between the U.S. and Britain after the U.K. government claimed Muammar Gaddafi is a legitimate target for assassination.

U.K. government officials said killing the Libyan leader would be legal if it prevented civilian deaths as laid out in a U.N. resolution.

But U.S. defence secretary Robert Gates hit back at the suggestion, saying it would be ‘unwise‘ to target the Libyan leader adding cryptically that the bombing campaign should stick to the ‘U.N. mandate‘.

Reported The Daily Mail

What gives anyone the right to murder another human being because “they” think it is right, because “they” want to “prevent civilian deaths“, and then the exact same government officials promptly launch wave after wave of aerial bombings which in turn led to the killing of many of the “civilians” they were trying to protect. A touch of deja-vu here, wasn’t a very similar statement made before “Operation Iraqi Freedom“, an operation which resulted (and still is resulting) in the deaths of over a reported 100,000 civilians (source) while “freeing” them from the “evil dictator” Saddam Hussain on some very questionable evidence served up by the UK government and it’s allies in Washington. Are you beginning to see the similarities here, and what about those civilian deaths? Will the U.N authorise a coalition of the willing (I am sure there will be many offers) and the enforcement of a “no fly zone” in the U.S. UK and France to bring these evil murdering dictators to justice? Yes I do mean you Mr Barack Obama, Mr David Cameron and Mr Nicolas Sarkozy. Well my advice is, don’t hold your breath on that one!

My point is this, regardless of what anyone believes or what their opinions were, we are supposed to be an evolved race of human beings, an evolutionary process which should allow us to respect the right of “life”, the right of life for the civilians of Libya and a right of life to the accused by the accusers. I live in a country where the rule of law is more or less resoundingly respected, the UK was one of the first civilisations on the planet to have a written rule of law and the last time I looked assassination wasn’t on that list, yes that is directed to you Mr Hague. No matter how repulsive Muammar Gaddafi was, no matter how horrendously he treated his population, no matter how many terrorist organisations he supported, we still have no right as an advanced society to pursue and murder another human being regardless of who fired the final shot. The guilty are the ones who supplied the bullet and then provided the motivation to the person who pulled the trigger.

And finally on whether he should have been captured and put on trial for his crimes, I believe someone more powerful and encompassing than us all has a very strong opinion on the matter, I believe God stated “Thou shalt not kill“. I rest my case.

But hold on a minute, are we sure he is dead? Why say something like that I here you say, well read this and become enlightened:

The corporate media is going into paroxysms over the supposed death of Muammar Gaddafi without much evidence beyond a couple blurry video captures taken from a cell phone.

Writes Kurt Nimmo over at

He then goes on state:

So far, there has been zero independent verification of the claim. The NTC – otherwise known as al-Qaeda – said earlier today it has whisked off the body to a secret location for “security reasons.”

Despite the lack of evidence, the corporate media is now accepting Gaddafi’s death as fact. This is the same media that accepted the unconfirmed death of Osama bin Laden and told us Saddam had aluminum tubes of mass destruction.

Kurt has a very strong and valid point here. He continues with a very convincing argument for the reason behind the announcement of Gaddafi’s death today:

Mathaba claims “NATO and Clinton are desperate to show a ‘victory’ in Libya, by way of a compliant media, and the NTC is anxious to provide that ‘victory’ for their masters, in order to secure further support. The NTC leaders and their factions are all fighting amongst each other, and are dissatisfied with the spoils, which so far have not been forthcoming due to the armed population putting up a fierce resistance, and the globalist bankers being unable to keep their promises to the Libyan traitors.”

And in Kurts final comment, which we, and all Arab nations, should sit up and take notice of, especially you Mr Mahmoud Ahmadinejad:

The globalists hated Nasser because he was an Arab nationalist. They hate Gadaffi for much the same reason.

Hence my headline “Gadaffi is Dead Long Live The New World Order” but why? No, not why “Long Live The New World Order” (Their day of judgement will come) Why Gadaffi, Why Libya and why now?

Well read this excerpt from Pepe Escobar’s article in the “Asia Times Online” from way back in April 2011:

You invade Bahrain. We take out Muammar Gaddafi in Libya. This, in short, is the essence of a deal struck between the Barack Obama administration and the House of Saud. Two diplomatic sources at the United Nations independently confirmed that Washington, via Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, gave the go-ahead for Saudi Arabia to invade Bahrain and crush the pro-democracy movement in their neighbor in exchange for a “yes” vote by the Arab League for a no-fly zone over Libya – the main rationale that led to United Nations Security Council resolution 1973.

The revelation came from two different diplomats, a European and a member of the BRIC group, and was made separately to a US scholar and Asia Times Online. According to diplomatic protocol, their names cannot be disclosed. One of the diplomats said, “This is the reason why we could not support resolution 1973. We were arguing that Libya, Bahrain and Yemen were similar cases, and calling for a fact-finding mission. We maintain our official position that the resolution is not clear, and may be interpreted in a belligerent manner.”

As Asia Times Online has reported, a full Arab League endorsement of a no-fly zone is a myth. Of the 22 full members, only 11 were present at the voting. Six of them were Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) members, the US-supported club of Gulf kingdoms/sheikhdoms, of which Saudi Arabia is the top dog. Syria and Algeria were against it. Saudi Arabia only had to “seduce” three other members to get the vote.

Translation: only nine out of 22 members of the Arab League voted for the no-fly zone. The vote was essentially a House of Saud-led operation, with Arab League secretary general Amr Moussa keen to polish his CV with Washington with an eye to become the next Egyptian President.

Humanitarian imperialists will spin en masse this is a “conspiracy”, as they have been spinning the bombing of Libya prevented a hypothetical massacre in Benghazi. They will be defending the House of Saud – saying it acted to squash Iranian subversion in the Gulf; obviously R2P – “responsibility to protect” does not apply to people in Bahrain. They will be heavily promoting post-Gaddafi Libya as a new – oily – human rights Mecca, complete with US intelligence assets, black ops, special forces and dodgy contractors.

Thus, in the beginning, there was the great 2011 Arab revolt. Then, inexorably, came the US-Saudi counter-revolution. Reported Pepe Escobar Apr 2nd 2011

It never ceases to amaze me how easily you can uncover the New World Order’s agendas by just a little scratching of the surface. Here we see them get three birds with one stone, a warped and flawed legitimacy to begin a war with Libya, the next Egyptian leader all groomed and ready for office and a major puppet of the U.S. pressing it’s will and influence on Bahrain and the reward, well it is another piece of the Globalist Agenda jigsaw put into place. The never ending creep of the Globalist Agenda sweeps ever closer to total take over of the Middle East and subjugation of it’s people.


Muammar Gaddafi was far from what is expected of a civilised leader of a modern country should be, he was a political dictator and a tyrant who ruled with an iron fist and persecuted any opponents of his regime. He exported terror around the world, mostly to the west, supplied arms and explosives to any terrorist organisation who wanted them, who in-turn used these new deadly tools to kill and maim many innocent people in their pursuit of their own individual causes. Yes the world is probably better off without him, did he deserve to be murdered without a fair trial, well that will be on the concious of those who instigated the war. Somehow I do not believe they will lose much sleep over the circumstances surrounding his demise while they sleep in their comfortable, clean, luxurious and warm beds.

So where do the Nation and peoples of Libya go from here?

Well that’s where I despair, as Pepe Escobar noted Libya will be “a new – oily – human rights Mecca, complete with US intelligence assetsblack opsspecial forces and dodgy contractors

Yes thats a lot of “Power“, “Influence” and of course “Money” God forbid should we not forget the black gold “Oil”  sounds like a very similar situation to a country not too far away from Libya!

And caught in the crossfire least we forget those “innocent civilians” the venerable William Hague mentioned earlier, what fate lies ahead for the population? Are they to share the same fate as their neighbours in the death ridden and not to distant Iraq? Will the winning of their freedom also bring the winning of their “death and suffering” as a grand prize for freedom and democracy, U.S. and UK style of course.

I pray not, the world, especially after today’s news, is ever more descending into a large killing field, fuelled by an elite hell bent on global domination and the subversion of it’s people. I pray the people of Libya return that particular prize back to it’s presenters and so called saviours who delivered them from tyranny. Replacing one megalomaniac with another i am sure is not what the people of Libya were expecting as an outcome of ousting Gaddafi from power.

Last Note:

This from The Telegraph:

19.32 GMT Nato has told Reuters they will end the Libyan mission.

The Libyan “rule of fear” is finally over, it said, urging Libyans to put aside their differences Nato said the mission will be brought to an end in coordination with the UN and NTC.

It may be over in Libya for NATO but who is next on their “Hit List”? Are you reading this Mr Ahmadinejad?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Responses

  1. squodgy says:

    Blair, Cameron, Hague, all rely on LIES and the ignorance of joe public, fed on sport & jew propaganda.

    This video shows why he had to go (apart from his threat to start an alternative currency to the petrodollar).

    He looked after his people, and that’s a bad thing for the banksters, oil companies and jews.

  2. Alive!!! says:

    He is still alive, these are all doubles, photo shops etc…

Leave a Reply

© 2011 Pakalert Press. All rights reserved.