How Reptiles Evolved to Form Humans Full Documentary.
Cover just about everything including ancient history, Maya, Rome, Greece, The New World, Egypt, planet earth, the solar system, the universe, modern physics, television, archaeology, science, technology, nature, plants, animals, wildlife, environmental concerns and issues, global warming, natural disasters, World wars, combat, battles, military and combat technology, current affairs and events, education, biographies, news and current events, Illuminati, Area 51, crime, mafia, serial killers, paranormal, supernatural, cults, government cover-ups, the law and legal matters, corruption, martial arts, space, aliens, ufos, conspiracy theories, Annunaki, Nibiru, Nephilim, satanic rituals, religion, strange phenomenon, origins of Mankind, monsters, mobsters, time travel, and many other educational and controversial topics.
source
dont lose your dinosaur
Curious……are bald men evolving from our present hairy form? lol
SOME HUMANS ARE REPTILES.
only the Atheist people and the Antichrist people can think of crap like this .. first they said man evolve from apes. now reptiles. what's going to be next. I can see the headlines now.. atheist educated scientists found new evidence that humans evolved from chickens… coming soon. !!
Intelligent Design = "Humpty-Dumpty in the sky made the universe by magic."
i know most people wont understand it but their is evidence of metal usage tools from before the permian ice age that wiped out 99.99 percent of life on earth. That would have most likely either been only under bugs or amphibians
extract dna from the feases and walla
People who believe in evolutionism are fully deluded. Unrelated changes will never program directives that aren't there.
Piece of shit. Reported.
hi-ya we still have the African lung fish and coelacanth, evolution is b***** I don't believe in it. a number of things Charles Darwin got wrong.
bull shit, the tuatara, the coelacanth, and the mosquito are all unchanged, if things evolved, then howcome the coelacanth and ginko trees are still the same?
Try this. For a creature to exist a male and female are required (yes sometimes within the same body). Their reproductive systems must match exactly from the physical (which includes the hard-wired species information) to the nerve centre in their brains which has the "software" that drives the mating habits and controls the hardware and nurturing habits. It surely must be agreed that this "kit" cannot evolve over Millenia as it is only viable when 100% complete. So, in the very first instance that a new "kit" appears, say the mammalian "kit", it has to be in a perfectly matched male/female pair in order for procreation to begin. So where does the first pair come from?
Is it not noticeable how many millions of species of creature have graced this planet and how few basic reproductive "kits" there have been, a mere handful by comparison? This is engineering best practice, a standardisation which can be scaled and programmed to suit many creatures. I am curious as to how such obvious standardisation can appear in the apparent "randomness" of evolution which, it is claimed, has no design, no development, no controlled roll out and no planned end (as these elements would require an outside force) and yet, the final product is always strangely synergistic with whatever situation it finds itself in on land, sea or in the air.
Us humans now use in-vitro fertilisation to good effect and can even combine three donors to remove "unwanted inherited traits" which I don't think evolution can claim to do; synthetic biological engineering progression which has no foreseeable limits, indeed, a form of creation.
Dictionary: "Creation": noun
1.
the act of producing or causing to exist; the act of creating; engendering.
you dismiss a great variable in evolution ….because creatures girls likes that new changes
I see the fundies heads exploding.?
My ass evolved now it shits on evolution hahahaha
GOD designed human DNA different from all the animal DNA and that is why it is so complex only a fool would think it all evolved on the Planet of Apes.
Reptiles didn't evolve from Humans.
very interesting ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, and, obviously, mankind didn`t need a god to be in the world
wow. spectacular!
here comes the ignorant religious trolls.
Then the Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper who is just right for him.” So the Lord God formed from the ground all the wild animals and all the birds of the sky. He brought them to the man to see what he would call them, and the man chose a name for each one. He gave names to all the livestock, all the birds of the sky, and all the wild animals. But still there was no helper just right for him.
So the Lord God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep. While the man slept, the Lord God took out one of the man’s ribs and closed up the opening. Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib, and he brought her to the man.
“At last!” the man exclaimed.
“This one is bone from my bone,
and flesh from my flesh!
She will be called ‘woman,’
because she was taken from ‘man.’”
This explains why a man leaves his father and mother and is joined to his wife, and the two are united into one.
Genesis 2:18-25 NLT
Could it be that Darwinian Evolution is humanity's most foolish religion? If it isn't, it must be close to it
wow what a bunch of s*** humans deathly did not evolve from reptiles
I did not come from an iguana
Yes, its true. Things get more ordered and complicated as time goes by.
oh boy, here we go again… the most tenacious lie there ever was… Darwinian evolution. How to wake these people up? they have mud in their eyes from all those millions and millions and millions and millions of years.
I think the row goes like this:
one celled organism-fish-anfibien-reptile-avain-mamal.
If we evolved from reptiles, then maybe it should be called devolved. Pretty sure if any evolution occurred from reptiles to arrive at humanity, that we would have simply increased in intelligence but maintained the strengths of reptiles. But since this is not the case, not sure you can call it evolution. Not that this theory has any sound standing other than entertainment value and distraction from more realistic human history that is open for investigation and discovery. But arriving at these wild conclusions without sound evidence is just ridiculous. The theory that we are simply a scientific experiment by a hidden alien species is far more believable than this junk.
We evolved from early synapsids, not reptiles (which are diapsids). The split of those two groups happened over 300 Mya. These ancient synapsids of the Permian, e.g. Dimetrodon, may look like reptiles, but they are more closely related to humans than they are to crocodiles. I'm sick of hearing people use the term "mammal-like reptile." They aren't reptiles at all!
that guy is an odd fellow. reptile! should i say.
how do citys like new york survive? considering they have no agriculture farms or food.
Floor wax has the pruned nature of a storm cloud.
We did not evolve from Reptiles! We are genetically modified Neanderthals (aka Bigfoot)