One of the first articles published on this site was Sinister Sites – St. John the Divine Cathedral, where I’ve described the building’s occult symbolism and its role in the United Nations’ efforts to push a single world religion. Probably the most shocking part of that article was the pictures of the columns, conceived in 1997, depicting the destruction of New York city (including the Twin Towers). The Church was named after St. John the Divine, the author of the Book of Revelation.
The original article showed only two of these columns (the others were not visible at the time I took the pics). Since then however, the other pillars are visible and their symbolism is as esoteric and mysterious as those originally posted.
I think it is unconscionable to have scenes like these on a supposedly Christian cathedral. Is this now a depiction of how far from God, America’s religious ideology has strayed? The book of revelations may or may not be part of the true word of God but, regardless it does not speak of New York being destroyed, nor does it show the Brooklyn Bridge broken in pieces. Whoever approved these sculptures is suspect in my eyes. Something very sinister is at work here and it definitely isn’t Christian.
I think someone is taken the revelation for a spin, that is the main reason why people go to church out of fear, imo.
I think it is unconscionable to have scenes like these on a supposedly Christian cathedral. Is this now a depiction of how far from God, America’s religious ideology has strayed? The book of revelations may or may not be part of the true word of God but, regardless it does not speak of New York being destroyed, nor does it show the Brooklyn Bridge broken in pieces. Whoever approved these sculptures is suspect in my eyes. Something very sinister is at work here and it definitely isn’t Christian.