Is a False Flag Bioterror Event In Our Immediate Future?

Dave Hodges

Please allow me to express a high degree of naiveté in order to set the contextual background for this article. We live in a country which is bound by the rule of law. Our Constitution is immutable.

Unlike our European allies who grant civil liberties so long as it is in the common, or the “greater good” (i.e. Communitarian law), our Constitution protects its civil liberties above all else. With this being said, can someone please explain to me why the following law, that allows dangerous government experimentation on unsuspecting individuals, is allowed to  be a part of the American legal landscape?

Is a False Flag Bioterror Event In Our Immediate Future

USC 50 Chapter 32 Section 1520

(a) Prohibited activities The Secretary of Defense may not conduct (directly or by contract)— (1) any test or experiment involving the use of a chemical agent or biological agent on a civilian population; or (2) any other testing of a chemical agent or biological agent on human subjects. (b)Exceptions Subject to subsections (c), (d), and (e) of this section, the prohibition in subsection (a) of this section does not apply to a test or experiment carried out for any of the following purposes:

(1) Any peaceful purpose that is related to a medical, therapeutic, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial, or research activity.

(2) Any purpose that is directly related to protection against toxic chemicals orbiological weapons and agents.

(3) Any law enforcement purpose, including any purpose related to riot control. (c) Informed consent required The Secretary of Defense may conduct a test or experiment described in subsection (b) of this section only if informed consent to the testing was obtained from each human subject in advance of the testing on that subject. (Editor’s Note: Please take careful note of paragraph b and b(1) which allows for no informed consent for the victim of government testing).

(d) Prior notice to Congress Not later than 30 days after the date of final approval within the Department of Defense of plans for any experiment or study to be conducted by the Department of Defense (whether directly or under contract) involving the use of human subjects for the testing of a chemical agent or a biological agent, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the Committee on Armed Services of the House of Representatives a report setting forth a full accounting of those plans, and the experiment or study may then be conducted only after the end of the 30-day period beginning on the date such report is received by those committees. (e) “Biological agent” defined In this section, the term “biological agent” means any micro-organism (including bacteria, viruses, fungi, rickettsiac, or protozoa), pathogen, or infectious substance, and any naturally occurring, bioengineered, or synthesized component of any such micro-organism, pathogen, or infectious substance, whatever its origin or method of production, that is capable of causing— (1) death, disease, or other biological malfunction in a human, an animal, a plant, or another living organism;

(2) deterioration of food, water, equipment, supplies, or materials of any kind; or

(3) deleterious alteration of the environment.

At first glance, this law appears to protect the average citizen from unwarranted and dangerous testing by the federal government. However, upon closer examination, a blind man could see that this law has more holes in its protections than does Swiss cheese.

Abuse of Citizens Is Becoming An American Tradition

In 2007, Texas governor Rick Perry made the vaccine, Gardasil, mandatory for all Texan schoolgirls. The vaccine is ostensibly designed to prevent the sexually transmitted cervical-cancer virus, yet even girls not sexually active are forced to take the new vaccine. Perry was forced on the defensive to defend his relationship with the vaccine’s manufacturer, Merck & Co., as he took campaign donations from the makers of the vaccine. The safety of the vaccine is also increasingly placed in questioned as hundreds have been injured and/or died from being injected with this toxin.

The point here is to ask the pertinent question as to why the government, at any level, would require such a dangerous vaccine to be mandatory? What we will never know, is if the vaccine is dangerous and we still administer the injections, is this part of some government testing program? Oh, I know, here come the comments, the government would never do this and that this is paranoid thinking and I am some government troll whose well-paid mission is to spread fear in order to upset the social order. Really? Then, please try to explain just a small sample from our well-documented past of government transgressions against its people in the name of medical and research testing by the government on its people. Finally, does USC 50, Chapter 32, Section 1520, grant Rick Perry immunity from prosecution for his bad acts?

America Has a Long History of Experimenting and Attacking Its Own People

There are literally dozens of examples for the government experimenting on its people as a matter of policy. The following two incidents sets the tone for unwarranted government abuse of its citizens.

Most people understand the evil perpetrated against the Tuskegee Airmen as they were deliberately infected with syphilis.

In 2009, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine demanded a moratorium on genetically modified foods. The Academy’s findings stated, “GM foods pose a serious health risk in the areas of toxicology, allergy and immune function, reproductive health, and metabolic, physiologic and genetic health.” Despite this damning confirmation of GMO’s, the US government still allows Monsanto to create consumer confusion by not forcing the labeling of GMO’s and the government subsequently threatens a trade war against any country which opposes GMO’s. The MSM is strangely silent on this issue.

Because of USC 50 Chapter 32 Section 1520, he issue of a false flag attack upon millions through the Gulf Oil Spill must be now looked at in an entirely different light.

Was the Gulf Oil Spill a Deliberate Attack Upon 40 Million People?

The existence of USC 50 Chapter 32 Section 1520 casts a very serious light on the motives of the EPA and BP to use the most deadly oil dispersant on the planet in the aftermath of the Gulf Oil Explosion.

The following documentation demonstrates that the EPA knew how deadly the dispersant, Corexit is, as well as the dangers posed to the public. Yet, Corexit was used anyway.

The most damning account of the Corexit dangers posed to the Gulf comes from Hugh Kaufman, senior policy analyst at the EPA’s Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response as he stated on Democracy Now that “In light of the EPA’s data, BP’s decision to use Corexit 9500 and 9527 was based solely upon an attempt to profit on the clean-up and not carry out BP’s expressed desire to clean up the Gulf Coast environment”…these dispersants were used in massive quantities, to hide the magnitude of the spill and save BP money…Both EPA, NOAA, etc, have been sock puppets for BP in this cover-up. Now, by hiding the amount of spill, BP is saving hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars in fines…People who work near it (the dispersants) are hemorrhaging internally. EPA now is taking the position that they really don’t know how dangerous it is, even though if you read the label, it tells you how dangerous it is. What is that saying about swamp land in Florida?

Kim Anderson’s Oregon State University (OSU) team of researchers, investigating harmful chemicals following the Gulf event, operating under the auspices of the OSU College of Agricultural Sciences, began a test-retest comparative analysis for the carcinogenic contaminant polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), and its biodegradable partner, OPAHs, which appears after the application of Corexit and subsequent exposure to ultraviolet rays. Stunningly, the OSU researchers found a 40 fold increase in these carcinogenic compounds in the comparative test-retest period. The omnipresent dangers to Gulf Coast residents are self-evident in light of this research. It is noteworthy to report that the OSU researchers had the first draft of their report stolen before the results could be published.

The OSU findings replicate the conclusions of Mace Barron and Mace Barron et al regarding the toxicity of Corexit and its use in the Exxon Valdez oil spill. The Exxon Valdez oil spill and subsequent clean-up activities provides the only case study in the history of the United States involving significant exposure to the types of toxins discussed in this article as the result of an oil spill. Findings, related to the longevity of the Exxon Valdez clean-up workers, are very disturbing as their collective lifespan statistics revealed that the average life expectancy is a mere 51 years of age and nearly all of the Exxon Valdez clean-up workers are dead.

Award winning chemist, Dr. Wilma Subra, conducted blood tests on Gulf Coast residents who were symptomatic with new illnesses and found that some of the cancer-causing agents were 65 times the expected level in the victims blood tests. Subra noted that Corexit is in the air, the water and the Gulf residents blood.

Is a Bioterror Attack Imminent?

hospital tents

FEMA is advertising for contractors who are able to supply medical biohazard disposal capabilities, along with 40 yard dumpsters, to go with 1,000 tent hospitals across the United States.  The emergency roll-out of these services must be able to be completed within 24-48 hours.

FEMA is also seeking to obtain 200,000 doctors scrubs to be delivered to the 1,000 tent hospitals. FEMA is also ordering portable showers and toilets. Can there be any doubt that FEMA is ramping up the National Disaster Preparedness Program? The sheer numbers speaks clearly to the enormous size of the coming event.


I hearken back to the popular television show, Revolution, in which a MSM television network is prominently presenting re-education camps and a bioterror attack upon the people of the United States in order to reduce the size of the population as part of its plot in a hit TV series.

I think a good case can be made that a major bio-terror event is coming and FEMA is getting ready to control this contrived situation. Regardless, a Constitutional Republic should never tolerate a law which permits its government to conduct heinous experiments upon its citizens with impunity.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 Responses

  1. otter walks says:

    Given, that today is Earth Day 2.0, with The Global March Against GeoEngineering, I would say it is already upon us. It is insidious, it is silent, it is full spectrum. They have control and the when is the question. Certainly not the what, if we do not begin to take action. We need to chip away at the imbedded puppet front persons. If your incumbent is voting against humanity, is a eugenicist, a sell minion, vote them out of office! That is if we make it to 2016.

  2. Archie1954 says:

    The US Constitution is more honoured in the breach than in the observance!

Leave a Reply

© 2014 Pakalert Press. All rights reserved.