NDAA and Patriot Act are UNCONSTITUTIONAL, therefore VOID & POWERLESS

truther January 16, 2012 1

LAWS which are UNCONSTITUTIONAL are VOID. Unconstitutional laws are incapable of altering the constitution: they have NO POWER to “repeal” “huge parts” of the constitution, including 2nd & 4th Amendments and the Bill of Rights. WHO is lying about this, in order to DRIVE Americans to revolution? Wake UP!

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Disinformation from the 10th Amendment Center and countless others:

“NDAA Obliterates Large Portions of The Bill of Rights”

Source: by Harold Pease, on Thursday, January 12th, 2012 at 12:09 am. blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2012/01/ndaa-obliterates-large-portions-of-the-bill-of-rights/

THAT IS WRONG!

CONSTITUTIONAL SUPREMACY IS THE CORNERSTONE OF THE LAW

Mr. Chief Justice MARSHALL, delivering the judgment of the Court in Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 – Supreme Court 1803, had this to say of unconstitutional laws:

“If, then, the courts are to regard the constitution, and the constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the legislature, the constitution, and not such ordinary act, must govern the case to which they both apply.

Those, then, who controvert the principle that the constitution is to be considered, in court, as a paramount law, are reduced to the necessity of maintaining that courts must close their eyes on the constitution, and see only the law. This doctrine would subvert the very foundation of all written constitutions. It would declare that an act which, according to the principles and theory of our government, is entirely void, is yet, in practice, completely obligatory. It would declare that if the legislature shall do what is expressly forbidden, such act, notwithstanding the express prohibition, is in reality effectual. It would be giving to the legislature a practical and real omnipotence, with the same breath which professes to restrict their powers within narrow limits. It is prescribing limits, and declaring that those limits may be passed at pleasure. That it thus reduces to nothing what we have deemed the greatest improvement on political institutions, a written constitution …”

Source:  caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=5&invol=137

Mr. Justice Field, delivering the judgment of the court in Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886) correctly said:

“Their position is that a legislative act, though unconstitutional, may in terms create an office, and nothing further than its apparent existence is necessary to give validity to the acts of its assumed incumbent. That position, although not stated in this broad form, amounts to nothing else. It is difficult to meet it by any argument beyond this statement:

An unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”

Source: caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=118&invol=425

However, a pretense that a VOID law is law, and does confer “rights” (or powers upon officials) and does “impose” unconstitutional “duties” to act in violation of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, together with misguided public behavior in accordance based on widespread DISinformation from posts the likes of yours, Mr. Pease, for The Tenth Amendment Center, would, “de facto”, cause the people to rob themselves of their rights, being falsely led to believe that the “law” had, in fact, already taken their rights from them.

The NDAA 2012 and other so-called “laws” of its kind are NOT LAW, precisely because they are unconstitutional.

Such VOID laws are incapable of any valid legal effect, let alone the preposterous effect alleged by Mr. Pease for The Tenth Amendment Center (whose mission is a new war of secession), and by others, that they “obliterate” or “repeal” “huge parts” of the constitution!

THE STEPS:
1) Judicial review to declare unconstitutional laws VOID, as by nature, they ARE void.
2) Impeach the bastards who pretended to “pass” these things and who then dared to order them IMPLEMENTED!

You don’t NEED another revolution, the NDAA is VOID!  The Patriot Act is VOID.  Tyrannical, unconstitutional laws are VOID.

Kathleen Moore
HABEAS CORPUS CANADA
The Official Legal Challenge
To North American Union

Source

 

Add To The Conversation Using Facebook Comments

One Comment »

  1. Cyrus January 18, 2012 at 9:27 pm - Reply

    Here is what our ancestors say to the NDAA and the Enemy Expatriation Act.
    http://codgerville.wordpress.com/2012/01/18/declaration-of-the-causes-and-necessity-of-taking-up-arms-july-6-1775/

Leave A Response »

SENGTOTO
SENGTOTO
LOGIN EVOSTOSO
DAFTAR EVOSTOTO
jebol togel
mikatoto
Slot Gacor
mikatoto