Newtown school shooting story already being changed by the media to eliminate eyewitness reports of a second shooter


Mike Adams

The national media is ablaze today with coverage of the tragic elementary school shooting in Newtown, CT, where 27 people have reportedly been killed, including 18 children.

As always, when violent shootings take place, honest journalists are forced to ask the question: “Does this fit the pattern of other staged shootings?”

One of the most important red flags of a staged shooting is a second gunman, indicating the shooting was coordinated and planned. There are often mind control elements at work in many of these shootings. The Aurora “Batman” shooter James Holmes, for example, was a graduate student actually working on mind control technologies funded by the U.S. government. There were also chemical mind control elements linked to Jared Lee Loughner, the shooter of Congresswomen Giffords in Arizona in 2011.

According to multiple eyewitness reports from Aurora, Colorado, including at least one caught on camera by mainstream media news reports in Colorado, James Holmes did not operate alone. There was a second shooter involved. But the media quickly eliminated any mention of a second shooter from its coverage, resorting to the typical cover story of a “lone gunman.”

Today, the exact same thing is happening with the Newton, CT school shooting.

Eyewitness reports of a second shooter now being “scrubbed” from the news

As the story of this shooting was first breaking, the news was reporting a second gunman.

FoxNews reported that this second gunman was “led out of the woods by officers” and then questioned. The original source of this report was the Connecticut Post.

A local CBS affiliate was also reporting the existence of a second gunman and said “Police believe there may be a second gunman and are looking for a red or maroon van with its back window blown out…”

ABC News also originally reported, “A second gunman is apparently at large. Car-to-car searches are underway.”

A local CT CBS affiliate was also reporting, “CBS News reports that a potential second shooter is in custody and that SWAT is now investigating the home of the suspect. A witness tells WFSB-TV that a second man was taken out of the woods in handcuffs wearing a black jacket and camouflage pants and telling parents on the scene, ‘I did not do it.'”

But the more recent stories being put out by the media are scrubbing any mention of a second gunman and going with the “lone gunman” explanation, which holds about as much water as the “lone gunman” explanation of the JFK assassination.

“A lone gunman killed 27 people at an elementary school here, including 18 children, in a terrifying early Friday morning shooting spree,” reports USA Today. It makes no mention whatsoever of a second gunman.

NBC News is also now chiming in with the “lone gunman” version of the story, eliminating any mention of a second gunman from its coverage of the tragic event.

Another story authored by NBC News carries the title, “26 dead after lone gunman assaults Connecticut elementary school.” Once again, no mention of a second gunman as reported by eyewitnesses.

When key elements of the story keeps changing, something is fishy

Journalists are trained to ask questions, and one of the questions I have right now is: Why was the second gunman suddenly dropped from media coverage after the first few hours of this story developing?

And why is there always a second gunman in these recent mass shootings that seem to be engineered to maximize emotional shock value due to the sheer horror of all the innocent deaths?

This story is continuing to develop, and we’ll keep asking questions here on Natural News. Our hearts and prayers go out to the children and families impacted by this violent tragedy. Given the terrible loss of life that has taken place here, shouldn’t we all seek to get to the bottom of WHY these shootings all seem to fit a common pattern of multiple mind-controlled shooters followed by an almost immediate media cover-up of the facts?

For the sake of those children who were killed today, I want to get to the bottom of this and expose the REAL story, for the purpose of stopping this violence from targeting yet more innocents in the future.

Watch the video: Proof that guns don’t kill people

This article first appeared at Natural News.

5 Responses

  1. a voice in the wilderness says:

    It is difficult to tell who is the bigger lier Hillary or Bill? The more a story is covered up the more it will be uncovered by honest men who will pursue truth at any cost. Everything the government proposes or exposes cannot be accepted as valid information, do your history and discover the real government.truth

  2. ohboy says:

    Reports have surfaced that this man’s mother was not a teacher at that school. Lots of b.s. being put out about her being a teacher and that simply isn’t true. What proof do we have he killed his mother? None. You are being told Lanza killed his mother in her bed, still in pajamas. You are being told that he killed himself. Proof? None and none offered. If there are no witnesses, is this all surmising? The media has lost their power a long time ago and have become media puppets by the big owners in control. We have become no different than Russia or China or Korea that we learned about in school years ago.

  3. ohboy says:

    Everything in the news gets twisted and put forth as propaganda. Nothing is factual. Nothing is totally honest. Nothing is even investigated and then reported on because of the total control in the main stream media. Now the alternate media you can bet are being threatened. Just go back to JFK and see how it has all been smoke and mirrors people! Open your mind as to who controls the money and you will know who controls the country!

  4. Jessica says:

    If there’s a video of a second shooter, did the filmer(s) post it somewhere online? God, with so many people having their phones on them these days, why the reports without the hard evidence? Those reports could be false but I don’t know for sure either way. Mis/Disinformants exist on all sides of the debate. I think it’ll take more weeks to compare evidence for a clearer picture.

    As for the Mike Adams video…Hmm…Video comments seem to all be in support. No problem if that’s all people had to say. Counter arguments censored maybe? Who knows.

  5. Hagendaz says:

    Another few key facts that I watched manipulated within the first 24 hours, (and now see the “lone gunman” story relatively slowly developed) Was the way the “lone gunman” entered the school. As well as the association of the “lone gunman’s” mother to the school. Her employment at the school, which (with in hours) was referenced to as and employee then a former employee and then eventually she was said to have no affiliation with the school what so ever. First reports were that the “lone gunman” was “buzzed in” due to the staff recognizing him as child of an employee, with in hours it changed to he shot his way into the school, no one buzzed him in. If he shot his way into the school (as is reported now) all class room doors would be locked upon the admin hearing the event indefinitely initiating a lock down situation until determining what the source of would be (this would have be incredibly loud shots at the front door). However common logic suggests the broken glass would be from a first responder locked out, unable to enter due to a deceased administration unable to buzz the door. Official reports were you could hear screams over the PA system suggesting an element of shock and surprise vs. a reaction to a breach in the main door (which they obviously monitor) due to gun fire. My feeling is this was done to avoid a “witch hunt” on the one who “buzzed the gunman in” but to suggest that a lone gunman which is more like a lone gun-kid randomly chose a K-4 old country house style school and he proceeded to take 6 lives (administration) then proceeded to a class room and took an additional 20 innocent souls………for no reason…………is a dishonor to the innocent souls that were lost…………….. My personal belief is this is overlooking the problem of mental illness…….the kid that did this horrid act was obviously looking for revenge or an outlet of frustration which given his method of expression was directly aimed at the individuals that were involved with what his feelings were. This is because it is easier to label someone a “evil” vs. “having a problem” which having a problem would suggest a solution could be found….. but evil is much easier to label because there is no solution. Mental illness has become an almost taboo subject it is either criminalized or institutionalized instead of treated as a virus or other pathogen would be. In which case we would inevitably be looking for a cure…………but its easier to say he was just crazy rather than take responsibility our selves for over looking those in our society that need our help, they are the largest group and yet they are the most overlooked…….we need to admit this lies as all things do of course at money. If we had universal health care the pleas from this mother who was killed by her son and committed this horrid act would have been heard and answered and there would be one more classroom of full potential…………instead we are left with a hollow memory associated with the happiest time of the year for years to come…..its up to us which way we move forward we can use this as a dark period in the festival of lights or we can say these children did not die in vain and they taught us all lesson, to look closer at how we treat the “troubled individuals” in our society and the consequences of ignorance. That is the only hope i have……………………god bless those lost at Sandy Hook Elementary School…..

Leave a Reply

© 2012 Pakalert Press. All rights reserved.