[ad_1]
On January 10th, Nicole Kidman told an interviewer that “we need to support whoever is the president”. A few days later, mass media reports that Kidman exhibited “bizarre behavior” during the Golden Globes … which took place over a week prior. Free speech is under attack using underhanded methods.
There is something seriously wrong with mass media and today’s political climate. Free speech is gravely under attack. Censorship is sharply on the rise. Character assassination is rampant. The absurdly Orwellian term “fake news” is used to dismiss important stories. Rational discussions about important issues have been completely evacuated from all platforms to be replaced with angry agenda pushing.
Those who dare go slightly out of the ideological boundaries set by mass media are shunned, harassed and destroyed. If we’ve learned something in the past year is that one of mass media’s boundaries is: “Do not show any kind of support for Trump”. But things are getting worse. The boundary is now: “Do not even acknowledge democracy”.
A few weeks ago, Kanye West was handcuffed and forcibly sent to a hospital shortly after KIND OF showing support for Trump. Indeed, during one of his shows, West praised Trump’s strategy of bypassing mass media (and its outdated methods) to reach his electorate. While this fact alone might not explain his forced hospital visit, it was nevertheless oddly timed.
After news got out that Jennifer Holliday would sing at Trump’s inauguration, she was subject to violent backlash.
“Jennifer Holliday pulled the plug on her inauguration performance because people threatened to kill her and her family … TMZ has learned.
The “Dreamgirls” star agreed to sing at an inaugural event but did an about-face Saturday, saying she bailed because she was taking heat from the LGBT community.
But we’ve learned when her agent contacted the Inauguration Committee, he said the reason was death threats. We’re told the LGBT concerns were not even mentioned.
A rep for Holliday told TMZ Monday … both the death threats and the LGBT reaction were factors in her decision.
The rep tells us, “It was all of those things. She wasn’t scared to perform. She didn’t want to put her family at risk based on the death threats and she also didn’t want to offend the LGBT community which was especially upset that a past ally would perform on a program with President-Elect Donald Trump.”
– TMZ, Canceled Trump Inauguration because of death threats
Nicole Kidman appears to be a new target. At least, she is being severely warned. Not unlike Kanye West and Jennifer Holliday, Kidman did not even openly support Trump. She simply shared her views about democracy. But that does not fit with the current mass media narrative.
Backlash Against Nicole Kidman
On January 10th, Nicole Kidman told Victoria Derbyshire on BBC television:
“[Trump is] now elected and we, as a country, need to support whoever is the president. That is what the country is based on. And however that happened, he’s there, and let’s go.”
Since this blasphemous remark, Kidman has been the subject of attacks. She even felt the need to defend her claims by later adding:
“I was trying to stress that I believe in democracy and the American Constitution, and it was that simple.”
Here’s the video where she basically tells people to stop harassing her about this.
Despite this fact, shortly after her statements, “news” came out questioning Kidman’s sanity. Indeed, a few days after the BBC interview, “reports” emerged that Kidman exhibited bizarre behavior at the Golden Globe awards, which took place over a week prior, on January 8th. In other words, they went back in time to dig up something to use against her. And it made headlines all over the world.
The Daily Mail article states:
“In a report published in the magazine this week, the Aussie actress is said to have left ‘some observers wondering whether she’d had a few too many pre-show wines’.
The evening began with the actress interrupting British actor Tom Hiddleston’s red carpet interview to insist she was having a good time.
‘Sorry to crash. I’m so happy to be here and I’m determined to have fun. That’s why I came here and did that,’ she quipped as camera’s rolled.
However later at an after-party, the Lion star, who was nominated for a Best Actress award that evening, Nicole reportedly chose to ‘shoo away’ a cocktail waitress.
The 49-year-old was evidently hungry as she was ‘constantly ushering over’ waiters with pizza.
Husband Keith Urban, 49, was left to brush pizza crumbs off her frock, the magazine alleges.”
– Daily Mail, Getting pizza all over her frock, ‘shooing away’ a cocktail waitress and interrupting interviews: Nicole Kidman’s ‘bizarre behaviour’ at the Golden Globes revealed
Other celebrities such as Joss Whedon (director of the movie Cabin in the Woods) took aim at Kidman for her unacceptable comments about democracy.
Kidman Knows About the Elite
Throughout the years, Kidman has been in contact with some of the shadiest elite groups in the world.
She was married to Tom Cruise, who is the most prominent Scientologist in the world (Scientology was founded by occultist L. Ron Hubbard who was close to occultist Aleister Crowley). Kidman’s divorce with Cruise was extremely messy as it was deeply interwoven with Scientology politics. Since the divorce, all kinds of bizarre reports and rumors have been emanating about this relationship. More recently, Leah Remini revealed that Nicole’s children Bella and Connor (both deep into Scientology) have turned against their mother.
“Remini shared a post-wedding ride to the airport with kids Bella and Connor, asking if they’d seen their mother recently.
“Not if I have a choice,” snapped Bella, according to the book. “Our mom is a f—ing SP.”
In church terminology, SP is a Suppressed Person and designated enemy.”
– Uproxx, Leah Remini Claims That Nicole Kidman’s Kids Consider Her A ‘Suppressed Person’
In 1998, while Nicole Kidman and Tom Cruise were Hollywood’s “it couple”, they starred in Stanley Kubrick’s seminal movie Eyes Wide Shut, which was specifically about the occult elite and its rituals (read my three part article about this important movie here).
Perhaps the most controversial aspect about Kidman’s life is the accusations against her now deceased father Antony Kidman. This notable psychologist, biochemist and academic Antony (and Member of the Order of Australia) was accused, shortly before his death, of being part of an elite child abuse ring.
In 2015, a woman named Fiona Barnett claimed she was a victim of a VIP ring 40 years ago. Among the abusers was Antony Kidman.
“Fiona Barnett, 45, claimed to media in Sydney this week that she was trafficked to “paedophile parties” at Parliament House in Canberra aged five, according to the News.com.au site.
She claimed she was abused by an ‘elite’ ring which she says included high-ranking politicians, police and members of the judiciary.
“My experiences were horrific beyond words. But the way I’ve been treated for reporting the crimes I witnessed and experienced has been far worse than my original abuse experiences,” the news site reports.
Ms Barnett claimed there are thousands of victims of the alleged ring, and says that she witnessed child abduction, rape torture and murder.
She said the ring is still in operation and urged new Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull to prioritise making children safe.
Ms Barnett said she was fearful, but decided to speak out because she felt she had “nothing left to lose”.
She claimed that her reporting of the allegations to various authorities and those of other alleged victims of the VIP ring were “stonewalled”.
Australian Capital Territory (ACT) Police said in a statement that the “matter was thoroughly investigated by ACT Policing’s Operation Attest and there was no evidence to substantiate the complainant’s allegations”.
Allegations of the supposed ring surfaced in an estimates hearing of the country’s Senate earlier in the week when Liberal senator Bill Heffernan claimed he had a police list containing the names of 28 prominent people.”
– Independant, Woman claims she was pimped by ‘VIP paedophile ring involving a former Prime Minister of Australia’
Antony Kidman died a month after this complaint in Singapore, in mysterious circumstances. According to Barnett, Kidman fled Australia to avoid accusations and controversy.
“Yesterday Barnett released her own theory about Kidman’s death,” The main perpetrator of my child abuse, Antony Kidman, is dead after I filed formal complaints accusing him of the abuse, torture and murder of children in an exclusive Sydney ring. As a child victim of mind control I feel he’s been sacrificed for failing to adequately program me.”
“Kidman was responsible for ensuring that I never disclosed ring activities that I witnessed as a child,” she continued. “He failed. News of Kidman’s death impacted me, someone who has undergone intense treatment. I know that there are other victims of Kidman’s crimes out there who are perhaps not as far along the healing path as I am. I anticipate that news of Kidman’s death may have a serious impact on these victims. A perpetrator’s death can even trigger suicidal ideation.”
– Child Abuse Recovery, Nicole Kidman’s Father dies amid child murder ring allegations
In short, Nicole Kidman has been around all kinds of people and organizations. Since she dared going slightly against the current mass media narrative, she has been the subject of attacks against her mental sanity and credibility. Is this mass media’s way of warning her to shut up before she speaks? This trend is extremely worrying and this climate is bordering on all-out oppression. Why is this kind of dictatorial climate being allowed?
And, no, this is not about the “Liberals vs Conservatives” debate that is used to divide the masses. It is about free speech, an important RIGHT that we should all uphold and defend.
If we accept free speech to be denied to a category of people, soon enough, it will be denied to all people. The same excuses that are currently used to censor a viewpoint will be used to censor other viewpoints – maybe a viewpoint that matters to you. If one disagrees with the Trump administration, the constitution guarantees the right to criticize and even protest against it. But that right is also guaranteed to those with opposite viewpoints. If this right is revoked to some people, we are setting dangerous precedents that can (and will) be used against all of us. The true division is not between Left and Right, it is between the masses and the elite. Do not let them capitalize on anger against Trump to justify censorship. It’s a trap!
P.S. Before posting a comment saying “I can’t believe you support Trump” or something of the sorts, please take note that this is not a political site. It is about analyzing mass media and its clearly defined agenda.
[ad_2]
Source link
