Skyscraper Engulfed By Fire, Does Not Collapse

truther April 5, 2013 7

Building refuses to conform to post-9/11 understanding of physics

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars

The new understanding of physics since September 11, 2001, that limited fire damage can cause buildings to implode at almost free fall speed into their own footprints, was confounded once again as a 40-storey skyscraper in Chechnya was engulfed with flames for hours yet did not collapse.

Skyscraper Engulfed By Fire, Does Not Collapse

The blaze consumed an apartment building in Grozny, the Chechen capital yesterday evening before it was eventually put out in the early hours of Thursday morning. Fires burned on every single floor of the structure apart from the ground floor.

“According to the emergencies service, the blaze has damaged an area of more than 14,000 square meters. It has completely destroyed the plastic trimming used on the building’s exterior, but the interior remained untouched,” reports RIA Novosti.

The building is the tallest structure in the region outside of Moscow, standing at 145-meters (475-foot). No one was injured or killed in the blaze but dozens had to be evacuated.

Although officials expressed concern at one point that the building could collapse, its core structure was not affected by the huge fire.

Compare the skyscraper in Grozny to the similar-sized WTC Building 7 on 9/11, which was not hit by a plane, suffered comparably limited fire damage, and yet collapsed almost into its own footprint at near free fall speed.

Following 9/11, scientists agreed that instead of accepting the premise that some form of explosives must have been used to bring down WTC 7, physics itself must be wrong and that normal fires can burn hot enough to weaken steel cores, despite the fact that they were barely hot enough to break the vast majority of windows in Building 7.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) was forced to invent a “new phenomenon” of “thermal expansion” to explain the collapse of WTC 7, labeling it “the first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building” in history.

The collapse of Building 7 was so highly anticipated that it was reported before it happened by several news stations, including BBC and CNN. Firefighters, police and first responders were all told to get back from the building because it was about to be brought down.

The Grozny skyscraper is just the latest example of a building refuse to conform to our new post-9/11 understanding of physics, following the example of a similar sized building in Beijing which was also consumed by fire in 2009 but remained standing.

Add To The Conversation Using Facebook Comments

7 Comments »

  1. Mark April 27, 2013 at 11:00 pm - Reply

    So what you are saying that all building that burn for a long time must collapse even though they are build differently, have a different inside structure and the fire was burning in different areas? Yeah, makes perfect sense, sounds legit. XD

    • 5 War Veteran April 29, 2013 at 11:49 pm - Reply

      Mark
      So what you are saying that all building that burn for a long time must collapse even though they are build differently, have a different inside structure and the fire was burning in different areas? Yeah, makes perfect sense, sounds legit. XD

      LOL XD! If we consider that the WTC was built to withstand impacts of planes larger than what supposedly hit the WTC (yes supposedly) and that US building requirements are more strict than any other country except Japan.
      Then a building burns for hours in Chechnya and it does not fall because it was probably not laced with thermate explosives ans thermate residue was found in every tested sample of WTC dust (scientifically proven) and the owner of the WTC was video recorded saying “They decided to PULL IT”, a demolition term.
      So anyone who still believes the government line is simply an idiot. Cognitive Dissonance.

  2. Reverse The Ignorance April 6, 2013 at 9:44 am - Reply

    Building 7. If people still believe it free fall from it’s own you are an idiot

  3. les hulse April 6, 2013 at 4:18 am - Reply

    ive never saw any collapse, naturally,

  4. 5 War Veteran April 5, 2013 at 8:47 pm - Reply

    They only collapse when you use that “special” jet fuel supplied by MOUSSAD.

    WTC wired for demolition by MOUSSAD as per the US ARMY War College.

    • Reverse The Ignorance April 6, 2013 at 9:48 am - Reply

      War Veteran knows the truth. But I believe 95 percent of American are been fooled by this Elites and only 5 percent of total Americans are in the know. It’s quite frustrating if you are part of that 5 percent people in the know

    • Adam April 6, 2013 at 11:35 am - Reply

      I don’t know who wired it but I’ll go with it. Though I don’t think they were acting independently. This was a joint operation by Israel, the US, Saudi Arabia, possibly Britain, Al Queda rebels (CIA created) all as well. I don’t subscribe to the “Israel alone” theory. It was too well planned and worked like a well oil machine. The masterminds though were not even listed above. The masterminds was CFR (multi-national globalists), CAIR, Islamic Brotherhood, Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission. Overseen by the Council of 300. This is a top op. Ritual sacrifice to try and bring the Antichrist through through a mass sacrifice.

Leave A Response »

SENGTOTO
SENGTOTO
LOGIN EVOSTOSO
DAFTAR EVOSTOTO
jebol togel
mikatoto
Slot Gacor
mikatoto