The GMO Boycott List

Unlike those who are under the European umbrella, residents of the Americas are never informed of genetic engineering in their food supply by the food companies or the retailers. There is nothing about it on labeling, ever. When we began our work at Health Wyze Media in 2008 as Naturally Good Magazine, we knew that genetic engineering was a rapidly growing problem. Yet we were ignorant of the staggering breadth of the problem. Only a small percentage of the health researchers such as us, and the top executives of the biotechnology industry have any comprehension of how corrupted the food supply in the Americas has become. The problem is so wide and so severe that we have avoided reporting it for fear that truthful reporting on this topic would harm our credibility. People would never believe it. For us as reporters, the exploding disease statistics prove that our discoveries are not flawed or exaggerated, and those staggering numbers include all of those supposedly mysterious “genetic disorders” that never existed before in history. Let’s not forget those new “immune system disorders” either, which do not afflict peoples in remote societies that live on organic diets.

The U.S. Government works in close collusion with the biotechnology industry. Monsanto is the biggest producer of genetically engineered seeds worldwide. It averages about $8 million in payola to political campaigns every year. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas once worked as a lawyer for Monsanto, and coincidentally has never voted against Monsanto in any of its legal battles. Eight lawmakers hold stock in Monsanto. Senator Kay Hagan from North Carolina is a typical example, and she is given routine tours through Monsanto’s research facility like visiting royalty. Monsanto directly contributed $500,000 to federal candidates during the 2012 election. Monsanto also partners with CropLife America, one of the largest lobbying groups in Washington. Michael Taylor, the Deputy Commissioner of the F.D.A., worked as the ‘Food Safety Czar’ and Vice President of Public Policy for Monsanto in a revolving door system of employment for appreciated F.D.A. employees. Monsanto maintains close friends in the establishment that makes regulations governing genetically engineered food labeling, and in the governmental agency that evaluates the safety of genetically engineered foods. Dow chemical company, the second largest producer of genetically engineered seeds, has similar governmental relationships.

“If you put a label on genetically engineered food you might as well put a skull and crossbones on it.”

— Norman Braksick, President of Asgrow Seed Company, a Monsanto subsidiary

One of the reasons why these companies are so opposed to labeling is that independent groups would then be able to track the diseases that are caused by genetically engineered foods. They would finally be able to publicly conduct controlled studies that are focused on the health implications. Universities and research foundations are currently unable to perform such health-related research on genetically engineered foods, because both the seeds and the genetically engineered genes are patented. Seed producers either refuse to provide the seeds, or only provide them with non-disclosure agreements that prevent researchers from revealing the results to the public. This how the “science” of genetic engineering is manipulated to ensure that only positive results get published. The scarcity of independent research that actually does get published is an indication of how bad the results must be overall.

The companies listed in the following data tables have been working tirelessly to ensure that we never get the right to know the truth about our foods. They have perverted our laws through targeted campaign contributions, and they have rigged referendum votes. For example, California’s Proposition 37 which would have required G.M.O. labeling in California, had the support of 90% of the electorate before going to ballot on November 6th, 2012; but it somehow lost with only 47% supporting it. We are expected to believe that 90% of the population of California went from supporting honest food labeling to only 47% of California wanting to know what it was eating, in the span of a couple of hours, during only the voting period. What supposedly happened in California is a statistical impossibility, but the opposition felt that it had to win at all cost. Requiring the labeling of genetically engineered ingredients would have ultimately required accurate labeling across the entire United States, because it would have been too difficult logistically and too expensive to manage two product lines for every product sold. If the California citizens had been allowed to have their vote, then genetically altered foods would have disappeared from American grocery stores.

For decades, these evil companies have been replacing the natural ingredients in the foods that they manufacture with artificial chemical substitutes. Thus, these companies are more responsible for our current epidemics of diseases than anyone else, and the people responsible ought to be tried for mass murder. Now they see the opportunity to not only replace natural food ingredients with chemicals, but also with artificial Franken-foods from the nuclear and biotechnology industries as well. We call for a boycott. The companies denoted with a red dot (•) are subsidiary companies that specifically market to have healthy products or to have natural ingredients. Many of these companies have been repeatedly sued for making bogus health claims and lying about their ingredients.

Source: healthwyze.org

Unlike those who are under the European umbrella, residents of the Americas are never informed of genetic engineering in their food supply by the food companies or the retailers. There is nothing about it on labeling, ever. When we began our work at Health Wyze Media in 2008 as Naturally Good Magazine, we knew that genetic engineering was a rapidly growing problem. Yet we were ignorant of the staggering breadth of the problem. Only a small percentage of the health researchers such as us, and the top executives of the biotechnology industry have any comprehension of how corrupted the food supply in the Americas has become. The problem is so wide and so severe that we have avoided reporting it for fear that truthful reporting on this topic would harm our credibility. People would never believe it. For us as reporters, the exploding disease statistics prove that our discoveries are not flawed or exaggerated, and those staggering numbers include all of those supposedly mysterious “genetic disorders” that never existed before in history. Let’s not forget those new “immune system disorders” either, which do not afflict peoples in remote societies that live on organic diets.

The U.S. Government works in close collusion with the biotechnology industry. Monsanto is the biggest producer of genetically engineered seeds worldwide. It averages about $8 million in payola to political campaigns every year. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas once worked as a lawyer for Monsanto, and coincidentally has never voted against Monsanto in any of its legal battles. Eight lawmakers hold stock in Monsanto. Senator Kay Hagan from North Carolina is a typical example, and she is given routine tours through Monsanto’s research facility like visiting royalty. Monsanto directly contributed $500,000 to federal candidates during the 2012 election. Monsanto also partners with CropLife America, one of the largest lobbying groups in Washington. Michael Taylor, the Deputy Commissioner of the F.D.A., worked as the ‘Food Safety Czar’ and Vice President of Public Policy for Monsanto in a revolving door system of employment for appreciated F.D.A. employees. Monsanto maintains close friends in the establishment that makes regulations governing genetically engineered food labeling, and in the governmental agency that evaluates the safety of genetically engineered foods. Dow chemical company, the second largest producer of genetically engineered seeds, has similar governmental relationships.

“If you put a label on genetically engineered food you might as well put a skull and crossbones on it.”

— Norman Braksick, President of Asgrow Seed Company, a Monsanto subsidiary

One of the reasons why these companies are so opposed to labeling is that independent groups would then be able to track the diseases that are caused by genetically engineered foods. They would finally be able to publicly conduct controlled studies that are focused on the health implications. Universities and research foundations are currently unable to perform such health-related research on genetically engineered foods, because both the seeds and the genetically engineered genes are patented. Seed producers either refuse to provide the seeds, or only provide them with non-disclosure agreements that prevent researchers from revealing the results to the public. This how the “science” of genetic engineering is manipulated to ensure that only positive results get published. The scarcity of independent research that actually does get published is an indication of how bad the results must be overall.

The companies listed in the following data tables have been working tirelessly to ensure that we never get the right to know the truth about our foods. They have perverted our laws through targeted campaign contributions, and they have rigged referendum votes. For example, California’s Proposition 37 which would have required G.M.O. labeling in California, had the support of 90% of the electorate before going to ballot on November 6th, 2012; but it somehow lost with only 47% supporting it. We are expected to believe that 90% of the population of California went from supporting honest food labeling to only 47% of California wanting to know what it was eating, in the span of a couple of hours, during only the voting period. What supposedly happened in California is a statistical impossibility, but the opposition felt that it had to win at all cost. Requiring the labeling of genetically engineered ingredients would have ultimately required accurate labeling across the entire United States, because it would have been too difficult logistically and too expensive to manage two product lines for every product sold. If the California citizens had been allowed to have their vote, then genetically altered foods would have disappeared from American grocery stores.

For decades, these evil companies have been replacing the natural ingredients in the foods that they manufacture with artificial chemical substitutes. Thus, these companies are more responsible for our current epidemics of diseases than anyone else, and the people responsible ought to be tried for mass murder. Now they see the opportunity to not only replace natural food ingredients with chemicals, but also with artificial Franken-foods from the nuclear and biotechnology industries as well. We call for a boycott. The companies denoted with a red dot (•) are subsidiary companies that specifically market to have healthy products or to have natural ingredients. Many of these companies have been repeatedly sued for making bogus health claims and lying about their ingredients.

Add To The Conversation Using Facebook Comments