The Vikings Documentary on the Life National Geographic HD 2

Pakalert June 25, 2015 20

Like and Subscribe please 🙂 ! Documentary documentary film online best documentary best documentary film bbc documentary documentary movies film a …


Add To The Conversation Using Facebook Comments


  1. VJ Blues April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply


  2. tridon asni April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    ugly hairy bruts, she said.

  3. Grand Champ April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    I'm still royally surprised at why in 2014, 2015 and 2016 people still upload in 360 and worse… There's no excuse for this.

  4. Cory Jordan April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    Absolutely AWESOME documentary. This doc is about THE VIKINGS IN ENGLAND/IRELAND (which is a big part of Viking history), the historical record, archaeological record, Norwegian, Dane and Swedish bloodlines continued in England. A very thorough study utilizing genomics and other technologies by which to determine how much, if any, genetics carry on strongly (or not) in portions of what is now the U.K. . If you're a history geek like me who's interested in all things 'Viking', you'll enjoy it despite the low resolution.

  5. Follow The Sun April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    When will we call it the English Holocaust and demand reparations? What the Norwegians did to the Northumbrians is genocide for their land and wealth. No wonder the English became so brutal.

  6. Coolnicknameguy April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    2:14:14 through 2:14:40 I got an idea? Scottish and Irish both hated the English right? England was a dick to it neighbors always, all times and that's  pretty much that, right? I mean, until now… maybe even still now, Im not an expert.. Now what if, just what if, the areas known as Scandinavia got in on the action where the Irish and mainly the Scottish could not cause they where too close. They kicked fucking ass and jack shit from the universal oppressor… Imagine, England is the new Rome, it picks on every one else and thinks its better then every one else and just like Rome it has internal power struggles going on and corruption.. eww sounds like my America lol, ok back on point. Then after the Vikings fucked up the English like the English fucked up every oneelse but the Vikings where more blunt proving a point to the English about bullying. Then the Vikings  go back to Dublin, maybe pay the locals that helped them with supply's and a place to rest on the way, TRADE, some mixing and settling down while most would head home. After a while Im sure the Vikings figured out "hey we can do more then smash grab and run, we can snatch this place and run the show! " It just seems odd to me to rob the English, be brutal and even enjoy the slaughter but then at the same freaking time peacefully trade and race mix with the Irish and Scottish? unless they too where like every one else and hated the English… just saying.. Check this out, Troy and Greece knew one another and had dealings with before the Trojan war right… Well what if at say rough guestamation, 400ad through 1100ad  their white little world was the British isles Scandinavia western Russia and northern France and Germany?  my point is when ever their is a Top predator country, state, group or flippin gang the branch out in a circle or half circle basically every time if they can. Look at what the Mongols Rome Persians white settlers in America, every one, if they can go north south east and west. These days we aren't limited to boats horses and our footsies so its a bit different now but before you always branched out in a circle or half circle pattern like ripples..  That being said, I bet English sailed to Scandinavia before the first recording Viking attacks and vise versa by at least 100 years..  I think the Vikings new very well who the English where and didn't like them very much, just like anyone else in that area in that time period, fucking der? Why hasn't anyone played this angle before? Its only obvious,  Im willing to bet in Scandinavia if they looked hard enough they find English type shit that wasn't plunder but from English Irish Scottish  peasant that immigrated telling stories of the evil English kings and lords and shit.  I think in that time period the German French English Irish polish Russians Scandinavians, basically anyone near the  Baltic and North seas all knew of one another for the most part and all new England sucked, like the modern-day American government and pigs the Crips Bloods and everyone else hates you but doesn't have the power to take you… in the case of the Vikings it turned out they did have the power. This theory of mine also fits why the Vikings where raiders of England and France but traders in Dublin Moscow and Constanta noble… I think the Vikings had allies and enemies so they raided the enemies and traded with allies. Think about this one final note, raiding silver and gold does nothing but make you look shiny if you don't have a place spend it. A $100,000 will do nothing for me lost at sea, I have to be at a place where I can spend it.  To sum up these drunken ramblings I think the Vikings weren't just out robbing anyone they run into cause they could. They robbed " THE MAN" and left the minimum wage guys be, like John Dillinger robbing banks not mom and pops store. I think that's why the English wrote about the Vikings as if they where dirty alkita Taliban Isis terrorist boogie man fucks..

  7. Russ Bolin April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    the old blk+wht tvs in the 60s had better clairity than this

  8. Aasim Muhammad April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    Alahu Akbah

  9. Frank Kremers April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    Thanks so much for this incredible upload. I Can't remember when I enjoyed a documentary as much as this one. BBC docu's top national geographic and history channel docu's every single time! Nevermind all the childish nonsense that is being posted!. Thank you

  10. Mikal Bell April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    I'm curious how they expect to distinguish the DNA of earlier Norse settlers from the Norman conquerors of 1066.

  11. Mikal Bell April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    Wasn't Harold Godwinson half Norse as well?

  12. Jonathan Bair April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    The Vikings did more then raid. They made colony as far east as Canada on NS island and also Iceland island.

  13. gristam s April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    i wonder how iva the boneless got his name

  14. James Hunt April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    Historians seem to forget the what the word viking really meant, they also seem to forget the other vikings from across the sea like the Kurs and Oesellians. The Kursi fought along side the Danes against Sweden many times. And while the the whole world was affraid of the Vikings(Sea Pirates), the Vikings were afraid of the Kurs.

  15. unclee fester April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    I have the Viking desease of the hand they talked about.I am proud of my Native and Viking blood.

  16. Goldenrod Willy April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    mike frog Fook get a life

  17. Swedish Viking April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    Brits, Yankees and ruskies will never be vikings. Stop trying to steal our blood and culture just because we pillaged your country.

  18. John Carlisle April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    they say attacks but not an earthquake…interesting…

  19. Aurora236 April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    you'll all crumble when Satan tests you!! What did you think the test was going to be God asking you questions

  20. thedirtyfecker April 9, 2016 at 11:47 am - Reply

    Where do they get off referring to the Irish as Britons? These people are historians and they know better than this. When you are well educated in your field you don't make statements like that unless you have an agenda. More of the same from the BBC.

Leave A Response »

jebol togel
Slot Gacor