Veiled Threats By Prominent Neo-Malthusians: Cull Human Population Or Expect “Vast Die-Off”


Jurriaan Maessen

In a report published last April by the Royal Society titled People and the Planet, the elitist UK-based society calls for massive population reduction and de-industrialization of the west. However drenched in euphemisms, the report cannot conceal its ominous undertones. Listed among its “key recommendations” the report proposes several measures similar to the one put out recently by MIT in which a drastic reduction of the population is called for in the name of “modelling” and predictions.

Immediately after the Royal Society released its call for more death and mega-cities, none other than Paul Ehrlich weighed in to regurgitate his own eugenic fancies. The Guardian reported that Ehrlich, who contributed to the report, eagerly endorses its conclusions. In regards to redistributing wealth, Ehrlich is quite upfront about his opinion on the matter:

“They (population and resources) multiply together. You have to deal with them together. We have too much consumption among the rich and too little among the poor. That implies that terrible thing that we are going to have to do which is to somehow redistribute access to resources away from the rich to the poor.”

“How many of your support depends on lifestyles.”, Ehrlich stated. “We came up with 1.5 to 2 billion because you can have big active cities and wilderness. If you want a battery chicken world where everyone has minimum space and food and everyone is kept just about alive you might be able to support in the long term about 4 or 5 billion people. But you already have 7 billion. So we have to humanely and as rapidly as possible move to population shrinkage.”

Then Ehrlich plays the harp strings of fear, making more veiled death-threats:

“The question is: can you go over the top without a disaster, like a worldwide plague or a nuclear war between India and Pakistan? If we go on at the pace we are there’s going to be various forms of disaster. Some maybe slow motion disasters like people getting more and more hungry, or catastrophic disasters because the more people you have the greater the chance of some weird virus transferring from animal to human populations, there could be a vast die-off.”

Some of the conclusions of the Royal Society report:

“The most developed and the emerging economies must stabilise and then reduce material consumption levels through: dramatic improvements in resource use efficiency, including: reducing waste; investment in sustainable resources, technologies and infrastructures; and systematically decoupling economic activity from environmental impact.”

What the Royal Society terms “systematically decoupling economic activity from environmental impact” is actually a rephrasing of Agenda 21’s plan to gradually de-industrialize the west as well as the creation of megacities in which the bulk of the world’s population can be locked up to make them more manageable. Or, what the Royal Society calls “the potential for urbanisation to reduce material consumption.”

In a statement put out by “Planet Under Pressure” in the run-up to the 2012 “Earth Summit” several scientists called for denser cities in order to mitigate worldwide population growth. When in doubt that UN’s Agenda 21 is not the Mein Kampf of our day, one should consider yet another in-your-face confession from yet another certified biocratic control freak.

According to an MSNBC article one of the scientists while speaking about human populations worldwide, stated:

“We certainly don’t want them strolling about the entire countryside. We want them to save land for nature by living closely [together].”

Insisting the world’s population be locked up within the confounds of mega-cities, the elite realizes that if the herd is to be properly controlled walls are needed- thick walls, and by constructing these walls, making the masses go this or that way will be made easier..

Chief scientist Michail Fragkias involved with “Planet under Pressure” told MSNBC that “the answer (to population growth) is denser cities.”

“If cities can develop in height rather than in width that would be much more preferable and environmentally not as harmful”, Fragkias said.

People who know anything about history know that the creation of mega-cities in which the masses may be rounded up and enclosed, is identical to the Nazi principle of the “ghetto” as a means of managing the masses. Every student of history may also know what happens to those masses shortly after.

Some of the organizers of “Planet under Pressure” are founding their plea on the notion that we (as humanity) have entered the “Anthropocene”: a new geological era in which humans- not natural conditions- are the main drivers of geological and meteorological processes. Citing a website devoted to this concept, Martin Rees of the Royal Society stated at the conference:

“This century is special in the Earth’s history. It is the first when one species — ours — has the planet’s future in its hands,” reported the AFP news agency. “We’ve invented a new geological era: the Anthropocene.”, he stated.

This echoes yet another scientist, a professor at the University of Colorado, who in recent times also mentioned this new era in relation to a call for population control when he stated:

“Scientists now speak of humanity’s increased demands and impacts on the globe as ushering in a new geological epoch: the Anthropocene. Such selfish and destructive appropriation of the resources of the Earth can only be described as interspecies genocide.”

In addition the professor said: “Ending human population growth is almost certainly a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for preventing catastrophic global climate change. Indeed, significantly reducing current human numbers may be necessary in order to do so.”

The call for compact cities, filled to the brim with humans, is part of the UN’s depopulation agenda. Within these proposed mega-cities humans will be allowed to use RFID technology so they can be kept in check. The rest of the world, the “countryside” as one of the scientists told MSNBC, is reserved for the elite.

Besides the call for denser cities in a, what Ehrlich calls, “battery chicken world”, the Royal Society report from April of this year also stressed that “reproductive health and voluntary family planning programmes urgently require political leadership and financial commitment, both nationally and internationally. This is needed to continue the downward trajectory of fertility rates, especially in countries where the unmet need for contraception is high.”

“Reproductive health” is a broad-sweep term including abortions (both pre- and post-natal), ant-fertility drugs and other means to cut fertility. The report clearly rehashes the old mantra that people are detrimental to the earth, and therefore human numbers should be reduced if the earth is to survive. Although the report asserts that “history has shown population growth can slow down without coercion”, it continues by saying that “timing is of the essence.”

“The sooner high fertility rates decline the sooner populations will peak. The policies and investments that are made in the coming decades will influence whether population moves towards the upper or lower boundary of population projected for the rest of the century”, the report goes on to say.

Another key recommendation: “Population and the environment should not be considered as two separate issues. Demographic changes, and the influences on them, should be factored into economic and environmental debate and planning at international meetings, such as the Rio+20 Conference on Sustainable Development and subsequent meetings.”

The report also stressed that education should be entirely brought under control of the UN:

“In order to meet previously agreed goals for universal education, policy makers in countries with low school attendance need to work with international funders and organisations, such as UNESCO, UNFPA, UNICEF, IMF, World Bank and Education for All. Financial and non-financial barriers must be overcome to achieve high-quality primary and secondary education for all the world’s young, ensuring equal opportunities for girls and boys.”

In 2004, emeritus professor of physics at California State University, Roger Dittmann, stated that all policies related to Agenda 21 should be pursued with the aim of worldwide population reduction and population control. “The Big Die Off,” the professor eagerly added, “has already begun.”

In his presentation Sustainable Development, the New International Scientific Order, and UN Reform Dittmann gives his own definition of the term “sustainable development:”

“Economic (and other) development that leads to reduction in population toward an optimum level for maximization of the quality of life, i.e. environmentally benign development that reduces the birth rate,” Dittmann explains on page 14 of his lecture notes.

Furthermore, the emeritus professor writes bluntly that (capitals by Dittmann) “The Big Die Off has already begun (page 17).”

In order to facilitate such a massive “die-off,” the professor proposes (page 18) global governance to make sure the directives will be universally applied:

“Since this is a global effort, it requires global organization, both governmental and popular,” he writes.

Dittmann’s specific remark concerning this “big die off” echoes Paul Ehrlich in response to the Royal Society’s report. Veiled threats from the most vicious of neo-eugenicists the world has ever known. I don’t have to remind readers that all this talk of death and mass-death is becoming more common every day. Only recently I highlighted the case of University College’s Emeritus Professor John Guillebaud, patron of the UK-based “Population Matters”, who depicted among other things a machine-gun, a hospital bed, and a knife dripping with blood, as examples of “natural” population control as opposed to “artificial” methods such as contraception and family planning.


Back to Dittmann’s 2004 presentation. In his notes he also calls for a new “International Scientific Order” to make sure the entire scientific community is armed and ready to implement worldwide population reduction. Dittmann:

“Not only do people require organization about their (multiple) identities (including professional, scholarly, and scientific), they need international, even supranational affiliation, facing a common adversary.”

This common adversary-remark is completely in the spirit of the Club of Rome’s 1993 The First Global Revolution in which the authors state:

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”

To illustrate that in the case of professor Roger Dittmann we are not dealing with some isolated mad scientist in a cellar-lab, his own resume will suffice:

“He served on the Executive Board of the World Federation of Scientific Workers (WFSW), in which he has been active since 1967, and has represented the WFSW at the United Nations. He presides over the U.S. affiliate of the WFSW, the U.S. Federation of Scholars and Scientists, founded in 1937 as the American Association of Scientific Workers, which is also affiliated with the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). He has also served as Chair of the Southern California Federation of Scientists, on the National Council of the Federation of American Scientists, as well as on the Executive Board of the Pacific Division of the AAAS. He has extensive international contacts and experience, including working with UNESCO.”

Ah UNESCO, always UNESCO. For those who think that the entire population reduction-mantra is somehow the end result of rigorous scientific thinking, the calculated, incremental and synchronized move toward a brave new world should inform them about its true origins. UNESCO’s founder, Vice President of the Eugenics Society and foremost transhumanist Julian Huxley, explained why global governance is crucial in his UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy:

“Even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”

Jurriaan Maessen’s post first appeared on his blog,

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

6 Responses

  1. Jim Hammer says:

    Lot's of meat on this bone, and it's hard to swallow. Death is the great equalizer, elite dna blood should know that it makes no difference in the end, gain the world, lose your soul, and the undiscovered self is not worth living. Hammertime

  2. Angelo Napolitano says:

    Stop with the fear mongering! There is no need for culling humanity… Just bring everyone on the planet up to the highest level of civilization. It’s an evident hypothesis… the more advanced a society becomes the greater it’s population declines. There is no need to choose who lives and who dies…. technology will create more resources and the population will naturally decline to sustainable levels.

  3. Davy Stephenson says:

    @ ETS

    These guys are sick for sure, they always run on the theme that the worst case scenario is just around the corner, when theyget it wrong, along comes their predictable Ex- post facto justifications as to why they were wrong.

    If you check the long list of awards that Elrlich has you will see every vested corporation where food is concerned and funding the message he spouts as the answers prior commisioned.

    Corporation who this very second monopolize in, creating multi thousands of deaths every day to commodity manouvering, 55,000 or there abouts, no because there isnot enough food, but because these countries can no longer afford their own food even.

    People actually fall into the subliminal traights of these procrastinators to their own longterm demise, because if no young blood follows their lead there will be less people to do the work for an aging population living longer lives out to grass, a position himself and his grandchildren will have to face one day.

    The whole sworded who gets what and why is patently unsustainable and will eventually fail as the people weaken and regain the skills that have been taken away in order of their despotism to grow like a virus amongst good breaders minds.

    A peaceful non compliance is tequired where mothers rufuse to contract aeay their loved ones to the farmers using wo/men as canon fodder and contracting away their labourfor the imaginary illusions thatnature herself needs not, namely money as debt and their checks for free, a global and living surplus for the false articifers against men.

    Re-skill, empower eachand evrey pair of hands as an equal for their own well being, recognise this facto and the road to freedom and sustainability will follow, fail to prepare and these idiots will prepare our failures for us.

    We owe as much for our own whole, wake up, take the red pill.

    Google, Human Farming, for a similar story.

  4. Davy Stephenson says:

    There is a problem in the eugenicists way of thinking, like the servants who helped bury the Pharos of old. In a nut shell/job, those who flew with the greedy crows for gain, were themselves dealt the final journey by the same crowsthey worked for, because the others could fly that little higher out of reach.

    So who might go first, not those backing the very ideas and models being purported here, not likey, or maybe they might want to have a good think again about that one. Lol.

    Pre natal is one thing, but post natal population control is patently unsane, yet there are dellusionals without children who have nothing living other than themselves to loose, who might be persuadeable in bringing such ideas forwards, and doubley unsane to sacrifice themselves as well, that may be the wisest idea anyone could bring forwards towards such thinkers of someone elses agenda and idea 21.

    The deindustrialisation of a nation will not drastically cut the numbers but infact encourage them, because idle hands tend to breed profusely, no telly, small or monocolour model to behold and all that shtuf.

    I vote for all the highest wasters at the top encouraging the lower 80% to vaulanteer to go first, and who ever fills their boots at the expence of the proles who’ s labour helped them achieve this task, but remained poor therafter, and so on, job sorted really.

  5. These guys are so sick I wonder if they could ever be saved so deep into luciferian agendas so perverted mentally and physically and the sad thing these nuckle heads are promoting this evil thru out the world as better living better education

  6. GJS says:

    The realisms of expecting less out of life in the way of material thing & everyone with their own personal transport would be far better & far less violent if we begin the process now through educational means, something that should’ve commenced in the 1970s.
    If we indeed just continue to ignore our depleting resources & once again just pass the buck to another generation we are condemning them to a life of hell on Earth by way of war for the remaining resources that are left & it will be a war like nothing ever witnessed before.
    Some people still mistakingly think that we’ll just replace fossil fuels with something else but to anyone who is actually involved or informed in alternate fuels know that to actually replace fossil fuels & just keep going the way we are is utterly impossible, unless there is some incredible breakthrough in something unknown at the moment that would replace fuels it still does not address all the other numerous things we take for granted made from fossil fuels as the actual ingredient nothing to do whatoever with being used as a fuel nor does it address the other myriad of resources that are becoming less abundant, scarcer & harder to get at.
    It truly is wonderous what fossil fuels have allowed us to accomplish & the comforts it has brought to our lives BUT for all advances we’ve made mankind still can’t acknowledge or come to grips with the idea that every resource is finite & we will eventually exhaust our supply, something that was indeed pointed out by some conscienscous scientists over the decades only to be rewarded with ridicule & being accused of being fear mongers (the greatest tool of the ignorant & decetful ) , many of whom will have the proverbial last laugh except they wouldn’t laugh they would cry for our stupidity & arrogance.
    My best to you all & good luck.

Leave a Reply

© 2012 Pakalert Press. All rights reserved.