(N.Morgan)
Tony Rooke has won his case against the BBC- Rooke was refusing to pay a TV license fee because the BBC intentionally misrepresented facts about the 9/11 attacks, he alleged. It is widely known that the BBC reported the collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 over 20 minutes before it occurred. WTC 7 was a 47-story skyscraper that was not hit by a plane on 9/11 but collapsed at free-fall speed later that day.
So Rooke said the BBC had to have had prior knowledge to a terror attack making them complicit in the attack. He presented the BBC footage to the judge along with a slew of other evidence, and the judge agreed that Rooke had a reasonable case to protest. Rooke was found not guilty and he was not fined for failure to pay the licensing fee.
It sure does sound like the judge also believes that the BBC had prior knowledge to the 9/11 terror attacks. Could this open the door for other lawsuits in the UK and abroad?
Please provide: (a) case number; (b) Which Court handled the case; (c) Name of Judge and Court to which he is assigned. Otherwise no one will be able to find it to use in subsequent cases. Further, regarding cases you should always provide this same info. Thank You.