Supporters of Bradley Manning are willing to put their life on the line and serve part of his potential 136-year prison sentence and are urging the military judge in charge of the case to consider this option.
The online petition titled “I Will Proudly Serve Part of Bradley Manning’s Sentence,” has gathered more than 2,500 signatures out of 3000 needed to submit it to Major General Jeffrey S. Buchanan, who will review the sentence of Bradley Manning once the military judge Colonel Denise Lind makes the ruling.
The petitioners in their request claim that “If we each volunteer to serve part of his sentence… it would bring attention to the amount of time this young man has been sentenced to and, hopefully reduce his sentence to time served.”
In submitting their signatures, the petitioners must acknowledge that “Bradley Manning provided information to the American people which our own government would not provide. He did us all a favor and, in turn I am willing to serve part of his sentence.”
If such a request is to get accepted by the US authorities, it would mean that each participant would serve less than a month, if divided into equal parts.
Petitioners age from young to old. “I am age 68 and propose that, strictly as a practical matter, volunteers should serve Bradley’s sentence from oldest to youngest. I’d feel privileged to go first,” one responded posted under the petition.
But most people agree that Manning’s leaks served the public good. “One day I hope my country won’t engage in the unwarranted massacre of civilians that was captured in the footage he released. He did us all a service by releasing that video,” one post stated.
Manning was convicted on 20 charges on Tuesday including several violations of the Espionage Act, but was acquitted of aiding the enemy, the most serious charge. The sentencing phase of Manning’s trial began on Wednesday and is expected to take up to a month.
Supporters of US Army Private First Class Bradley Manning gesture peace signs after attending the trial where Manning was read his verdict in the trial at a military court at Fort Meade, Maryland on July 30, 2013.(AFP Photo / Saul Loeb)
Source: RT
Really? Two minutes for adcito to load?
Having worked at a military brig it is not all wine and roses. It can be hard labor and long hours of boredom.
I do not envy the judges position and would recommend TIME SERVED.
Because anyone who tells the truth and can only expose that through the means available through military channels. Those channels are clogged and are designed to discourage all dissent. The soldier becomes a “complainer” not a “team player” and a threat to the command depending on the level of criminality involved and there can be a lot of that.
I exposed a security breach and I caught HeII for doing so. I worked with individuals I would not have trusted around closed and locked safes even if they did not know the combination.
More soldiers died from friendly fire in Viet Nam than from enemy combatant fire, who went to jail over that? NOBODY.
58 thousand American Soldiers died in Viet Nam, we entered into Viet Nam because of the Gulf of Tonkin incident where two navy ships were supposed to have been torpedoed by the North Vietnamese.
That NEVER HAPPENED. It was a FALSE FLAG and nobody, no lying politician, went to jail for that crime.
There is no justice when criminal Elite are allowed to write the laws and play chess with human lives.